Re: Reporter.apache.org displaying incorrect data - who is responsible for the host?

2015-06-30 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
I asked about it one week ago (with analysis of the VM state), but got no answer. Seems the only one to know is Daniel, and he doesn't check this ML or doesn't have time. I have access to the VM: it was given for projects-new. Technically, I can change reporter too, but since we're starting from

Re: Better specifying the scope of our Code of Conduct

2015-06-30 Thread Bkrm Adhikari
Yes sure i...do Rich Bowen wrote: > > >On 06/30/2015 07:23 AM, jan i wrote: >> Maybe I am a bad reader, but I read it as apacheCON CORE is not covered and >> surely apache big data >> (which is a "pure" LF managed event), because the space is managed by LF. I >> would like to see it "applied to"

Re: Twitter account, barcamp.

2015-06-30 Thread Nick Burch
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, jan i wrote: Does anybody which email is registred for our barcamp twitter account. It's the old concom private address, concom-priv...@apache.org, which luckily hasn't been closed done just yet! I wanted to login and tweet about apacheCON, but got stuck by this mail qu

Hosting Searchable Release Specific Documentation

2015-06-30 Thread Suresh Marru
Hi All, Can I get some advice on how projects deal with hosting release specific documentation? In addition to the CMS and Wiki, I am exploring alternatives which have a good search built-in. I preciously came across ASF projects hosting documentation on read the docs [1] and floss manuals [2]

Re: Better specifying the scope of our Code of Conduct

2015-06-30 Thread Rich Bowen
On 06/30/2015 12:37 PM, Stefan Reich wrote: I'm almost tired of criticizing so much, but... I think a "code of conduct" is evil legalese and should be abandoned. Like Jesus said: "Love is the only law you need." Unfortunately, that hasn't worked out for us so far. A CoC serves several real

Re: Better specifying the scope of our Code of Conduct

2015-06-30 Thread Rich Bowen
On 06/30/2015 07:23 AM, jan i wrote: Maybe I am a bad reader, but I read it as apacheCON CORE is not covered and surely apache big data (which is a "pure" LF managed event), because the space is managed by LF. I would like to see it "applied to" and not only "expect to be honered" for all apac

Re: Better specifying the scope of our Code of Conduct

2015-06-30 Thread Stefan Reich
I'm almost tired of criticizing so much, but... I think a "code of conduct" is evil legalese and should be abandoned. Like Jesus said: "Love is the only law you need." Cheers Stefan On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > Someone mentioned to me that they find the

Re: Better specifying the scope of our Code of Conduct

2015-06-30 Thread jan i
On Tuesday, June 30, 2015, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:23 PM, jan i > > wrote: > > ...I read it as apacheCON CORE is not covered and > > surely apache big data > > (which is a "pure" LF managed event), because the space is managed by > LF... > > It says "A code

Re: Better specifying the scope of our Code of Conduct

2015-06-30 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:23 PM, jan i wrote: > ...I read it as apacheCON CORE is not covered and > surely apache big data > (which is a "pure" LF managed event), because the space is managed by LF... It says "A code of conduct which is specific to in-person events (ie., conferences) is codi

Re: Better specifying the scope of our Code of Conduct

2015-06-30 Thread Christopher
+1 On Tue, Jun 30, 2015, 07:01 Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > Someone mentioned to me that they find the first paragraph of > http://www.apache.org/foundation/policies/conduct.html overly broad, > and I tend to agree. > > That paragraph says "this code of conduct governs how we behave in a

Re: Better specifying the scope of our Code of Conduct

2015-06-30 Thread jan i
On 30 June 2015 at 13:01, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > Someone mentioned to me that they find the first paragraph of > http://www.apache.org/foundation/policies/conduct.html overly broad, > and I tend to agree. > > That paragraph says "this code of conduct governs how we behave in any > f

Re: Mailing list subscriptions

2015-06-30 Thread Niclas Hedhman
Yes, I think so. For instance, I use GMail with aliasing another mail address and domain name. That requires the dev-subscribe-niclas= hedhman@jackrabbit.apache.org format. Would also be good to capture usecases when this is needed (I am not sure when). Cheers Niclas On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at

Better specifying the scope of our Code of Conduct

2015-06-30 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, Someone mentioned to me that they find the first paragraph of http://www.apache.org/foundation/policies/conduct.html overly broad, and I tend to agree. That paragraph says "this code of conduct governs how we behave in any forum and whenever we will be judged by our actions" which implies tha

Re: Mailing list subscriptions

2015-06-30 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > ...The page https://www.apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html is written > with "foundation level" subscription in mind. > > Which I think means that every PMC needs to replicate the same information > about how to subscribe to a mai

Mailing list subscriptions

2015-06-30 Thread Niclas Hedhman
Hi, The page https://www.apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html is written with "foundation level" subscription in mind. Which I think means that every PMC needs to replicate the same information about how to subscribe to a mailing list. Would it make sense to expand the "Project Mailing Lists"