On 1/20/15 9:02 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Justin Mclean
> wrote:
>> ...Perhaps change CD10 to this?
>> The project produces royalty free Open Source software
>
> "for distribution to the public at no charge" is straight from the
> from
It's probably best we start an online doc somewhere...
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
-Original Message-
From: Rich Bowen [mailto:rbo...@rcbowen.com]
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 12:29 PM
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: Knowing which
On 02/16/2015 11:49 AM, Nick Burch wrote:
Hi All
I'm trying to finalise the Content Technologies track for Austin, but
I'm struggling to know which talks have already been "claimed" by other
tracks. Some of the ones I want to include have review comments which
suggest they might have been, and
Thanks Joe, if you don't mind I'd like to hold on the container track. I'm
putting together a larger group of "cloud" tracks and trying to weave a
narrative through the whole thing. This includes containers. The good news is
you and I mostly agree on the valuable container related talks are. I'l
On 16 February 2015 at 20:38, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
> On 02/16/2015 12:06 PM, jan i wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> No response here, so I assume the FFT will be covered by Nick.
>>
>
> My impression was that he was saying that he was *not* doing it, and was
> looking for a replacement.
So was mine, but I
On 02/16/2015 12:06 PM, jan i wrote:
Hi
No response here, so I assume the FFT will be covered by Nick.
My impression was that he was saying that he was *not* doing it, and was
looking for a replacement.
rgds
jan i.
On 13 February 2015 at 12:48, jan i wrote:
On 12 February 2015
Hey all,
Have gone through talks in the CfP and here's what I'd like for the
Community Track and then a proposed Container Track:
Community Track
---
"The Apache Way with Kids: Using Community over Code in the First
Robotics Competition","Bob Paulin"
"From the Incubator to TLP: a ca
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015, at 10:21 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
> I agree Joe,
>
> We only have a very few immutable rules. Everything else is policy. As
> long as policy don't break those immutable rules the they can shift and
> change as much as they need to in order to empower individual
I didn't intend to say *all* rules are unnecessary. I said we have very few
necessary rules.
I didn't intend to say policy *is* rule, I said it is interpreted as rule.
Ross
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:seb
On 16 February 2015 at 16:51, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
wrote:
> I think that's exactly it. If we write policy down it becomes a rule.
Huh?
Written policy only becomes a rule if the document declares it as such
- or perhaps, fails to declare it as policy.
There seem to be a lot of unwritten r
Hi
No response here, so I assume the FFT will be covered by Nick.
rgds
jan i.
On 13 February 2015 at 12:48, jan i wrote:
>
>
> On 12 February 2015 at 23:23, Nick Burch wrote:
>
>> Hi All
>>
>> Hopefully most of you will know about the Fast Feather Track? For those
>> who don't, it's often de
I think that's exactly it. If we write policy down it becomes a rule. Rules
work great when every environment is the same, but that's not the real world.
We do, as a group of individuals, have the tendency to assume the way things
are done in project Foo is the entirety of The Apache Way. In fac
Yep. I've added some such comments, but got frustrated with the only CFP so am
now working in a spreadsheet you can't see (sorry).
If you see my name in a "owning" comment drop me a mail and we can talk about
which track it fits best.
Sent from my Windows Phone
Hi All
I'm trying to finalise the Content Technologies track for Austin, but I'm
struggling to know which talks have already been "claimed" by other
tracks. Some of the ones I want to include have review comments which
suggest they might have been, and some I'd just guess might be. I can't
se
s
On 16 February 2015 at 17:21, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) <
ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> I agree Joe,
>
> We only have a very few immutable rules. Everything else is policy. As
> long as policy don't break those immutable rules the they can shift and
> change as much as they need to in
I agree Joe,
We only have a very few immutable rules. Everything else is policy. As long as
policy don't break those immutable rules the they can shift and change as much
as they need to in order to empower individual project communities.
Coincidentally I wrote a presentation on this very topic
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015, at 01:38 PM, jan i wrote:
> I have a feeling that we are standing at a crossroad where many
> questions like Directd funding, ApacheCON, entry ticket to ASF
> (Incubator/pTLP)
> tear us apart, and I believe it is high time the members of ASF take a stand
> (whatever it may b
17 matches
Mail list logo
