Apache Way talks

2015-02-13 Thread Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
Nick called my bluff on my review comment for his Apache Way talk proposal. I said we need to update these and so Nick asked for suggestions - damn him making me work for my comment ;-) Here's what I was thinking when I wrote that comment... For years we've rolled out the same "this is how apac

Re: A maturity model for Apache projects

2015-02-13 Thread Shane Curcuru
On 1/9/15 9:23 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > > On 01/07/2015 04:43 AM, Scott Wilson wrote: >> I think we also need to discuss whether we expect projects to >> undertake self-evaluation and reflection, or whether we'd have a >> process of review involving peers, mentors, shepherds etc. > > No, I abso

Re: A maturity model for Apache projects

2015-02-13 Thread Shane Curcuru
On 1/8/15 6:53 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > But that then provides the ability to create a larger eco-system of > binary providers. I know I'm late to the party, but are we advocating that only having binaries provided by third parties is a good thing, or a bad thing? We provide software for the pu

Re: GSoC 2015 - very little interest so far

2015-02-13 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
My bad Uli. I will add a bunch of OODT, Tika, and Nutch GSoC issues. We will engage sorry Uli. Will try and add some to the tracker this weekend. ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Se

Re: [APACHECON] Proposed Science and Healthcare Track

2015-02-13 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
Cheers Suresh! ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.g

Re: Fast Feather Track - anyone want to take charge for Austin?

2015-02-13 Thread jan i
On 12 February 2015 at 23:23, Nick Burch wrote: > Hi All > > Hopefully most of you will know about the Fast Feather Track? For those > who don't, it's often described as: > > a series of short talks, 10-20 minutes in length, covering things that >> are new / interesting / exciting / incubating /

Re: GSoC 2015 - very little interest so far

2015-02-13 Thread Richard Downer
Ah, disregard my email, I see that you answered later in the thread! Thanks Richard. On 13 February 2015 at 09:33, Richard Downer wrote: > Uli, > > Can incubator podlings participate? As a we don't have a PMC (instead, > a PPMC) we didn't receive your mail but I think this could be a good > oppo

Re: GSoC 2015 - very little interest so far

2015-02-13 Thread Richard Downer
Uli, Can incubator podlings participate? As a we don't have a PMC (instead, a PPMC) we didn't receive your mail but I think this could be a good opportunity for our project. Cheers, Richard. On 11 February 2015 at 22:18, Ulrich Stärk wrote: > Hi Pierre, > > the original email went bcc p...@apac

Re: GSoC 2015 - very little interest so far

2015-02-13 Thread Ulrich Stärk
Simply label a new or existing JIRA issue with gsoc2015. Cheers, Uli On 2015-02-12 23:07, Pierre Smits wrote: > Hi Ulrich, > > How do they record their registration? Is it simply registering a JIRA > describing the intend or goal and tagging it with GSoC 2015? > > Best regards, > > Pierre >