Re: ApacheCon - Uncategorized talks

On 11/07/2014 Rich Bowen wrote: There are currently 48 talks that are still uncategorized. This makes it hard for me to schedule them. And, alas, I need help categorizing them. I tried to help but we are now at 49... I had to move back an irrelevant submission that had been mistakenly inserted

Apachecon EU 2014 and OFBIZ talks

Hi Rich, I have taken a look at the spreadsheet and it seems that the OFBiz pitches for talks all have the status 'New', these have been reviewed. Has the spreadsheet been generated before the reviews took place, or has something else occured? Best regards, Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM

Re: OSGi and CXF and Karaf and who knows what at ApacheCon

On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Jan Willem Janssen wrote: > I've taken the liberty of proposing a split for two tracks, > CXF and OSGi, which can be found in column M. This was my generalists take as well.

Re: OSGi and CXF and Karaf and who knows what at ApacheCon

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/07/14 21:36, Rich Bowen wrote: > I need help with the content that's in the CXF/OSGi tab on the > spreadsheet at http://tm3.org/aceu2014tracks > > I must admit that I am utterly ignorant of this technology space, > and I'm not even sure if it's

Re: ApacheCon - Uncategorized talks

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Rich, On 11/07/14 22:16, Rich Bowen wrote: > There are currently 48 talks that are still uncategorized. This > makes it hard for me to schedule them. And, alas, I need help > categorizing them. > > For convenience, I've moved these talks all over

ApacheCon - Uncategorized talks

Yes, me again. Yes, I'm going to keep bugging you right up until ApacheCon, and then start in on the next one. :-) There are currently 48 talks that are still uncategorized. This makes it hard for me to schedule them. And, alas, I need help categorizing them. For convenience, I've moved these

OSGi and CXF and Karaf and who knows what at ApacheCon

I need help with the content that's in the CXF/OSGi tab on the spreadsheet at http://tm3.org/aceu2014tracks I must admit that I am utterly ignorant of this technology space, and I'm not even sure if it's a legit categorization for a track or group of tracks. Can someone please review the stu

RE: Proposing for Apache Member?

While a little tweaking about contributions and contributors might help, the common use of those terms tends to be sufficient. The User hat is also a casual description. There are no bright lines. Note that "Contributor" and "Contribution" as narrow terms of art are called out by explicit d

Re: ApacheCon EU: What I need help with

Thanks for all your help so far, folks. We're down to the last few days before we're supposed to be notifying speakers. Today and Monday (and probably some this weekend) I'll be going through the various tracks, marking talks (tentatively) accepted or rejected, and attempting to build some kin

Re: Proposing for Apache Member?

On 11 July 2014 14:45, Pierre Smits wrote: > The hat 'User' states that the following: > > They contribute to the Apache projects by providing feedback to developers > in the form of bug reports and feature suggestions > > The hat 'Developer' states that the following: > > a user who contributes.

Re: Proposing for Apache Member?

The hat 'User' states that the following: They contribute to the Apache projects by providing feedback to developers in the form of bug reports and feature suggestions The hat 'Developer' states that the following: a user who contributes... In general, a user only consumes the work (the softwa

Re: Proposing for Apache Member?

On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 7:23 AM, Pierre Smits wrote: > How can it be that 'Contributor' is not an official 'hat'-definition in the > (explanatory) pages of the ASF? While so much importance is placed on > correct usage of terminology in projects and elsewhere, based on those > pages. > > Shouldn't

Re: Proposing for Apache Member?

Ross, How can it be that 'Contributor' is not an official 'hat'-definition in the (explanatory) pages of the ASF? While so much importance is placed on correct usage of terminology in projects and elsewhere, based on those pages. Shouldn't the document http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-work