On 10/5/2011 8:11 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
I'd rather do this using a special group that students are members of. That way
they can keep their
accounts if they are voted in as committers later.
That makes sense. It would be nice to have something a little more in
your face, but I suppose the
On 05.10.2011 16:51, Kathey Marsden wrote:
> On 10/5/2011 4:23 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
>> While it seems like a good idea to involve the PMCs some more I think that
>> we should, in
>> addition, require accounts created for students to be marked as such.
> I think this is a good idea. A simple su
On 10/5/2011 4:23 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
While it seems like a good idea to involve the PMCs some more I think
that we should, in addition, require accounts created for students to
be marked as such.
I think this is a good idea. A simple suffix like _tmp would be a clear
message to all, inclu
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
> ...While it seems like a
> good idea to involve the PMCs some more I think that we should, in addition,
> require accounts
> created for students to be marked as such
Absolutely - I think both things are needed.
-Bertrand
On 05.10.2011 11:48, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
>> ...In the past we allowed every committer to be a GSoC mentor. This is only
>> problematic with past
>> students that still have Apache accounts but have never been voted in as
>> committers
On 5 October 2011 10:48, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
>> ...In the past we allowed every committer to be a GSoC mentor. This is only
>> problematic with past
>> students that still have Apache accounts but have never been voted in as
>> commi
On 5 October 2011 10:48, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
> Never mind, did it myself, will fill out GSoC stuff later:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev/board-reports/board-report_2011_10.txt
We don't do them in SVN, we do them in the CMS. I didn't include the
link originally as there was a backlog
Never mind, did it myself, will fill out GSoC stuff later:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev/board-reports/board-report_2011_10.txt
Uli
On 05.10.2011 11:39, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
> Can you commit this to SVN please?
>
> On 05.10.2011 11:30, Ross Gardler wrote:
>> Below is my draft board repo
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
> ...In the past we allowed every committer to be a GSoC mentor. This is only
> problematic with past
> students that still have Apache accounts but have never been voted in as
> committers. So we either
> have to restrict mentors to be PMC me
Can you commit this to SVN please?
On 05.10.2011 11:30, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Below is my draft board report, can people please look it over and
> expand on any parts as appropriate. In particular we could do with
> some numbers on GSoC.
>
> GSoC
>
>
> GSoC went well overall, although there w
IIRC the discussion was not so much about how to choose and screen mentors but
what we recommend
projects how to handle their student's access to SCM.
In the past we allowed every committer to be a GSoC mentor. This is only
problematic with past
students that still have Apache accounts but have
Below is my draft board report, can people please look it over and
expand on any parts as appropriate. In particular we could do with
some numbers on GSoC.
GSoC
GSoC went well overall, although there was one serious issue
regarding a mentor who was approved but is not a committer. This
situa
The board report is due in a couple of weeks. I would like to have the
issue with vetting mentors wrapped up so that we can report the
solution.
I know there were discussions on this list. Did we get as far as being
able to make recommendations on how to improve the vetting process
next year?
Ros
13 matches
Mail list logo
