Re: Reviewing the evaluation process

2010-04-27 Thread Grant Ingersoll
Instead of redirecting, I ask the author to ask, so as not to presume to take something they deem private into the public. Chris Hostetter has a handy URL for this: http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#private_q -Grant On Apr 27, 2010, at 2:58 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > When mentoring, I also tr

Re: Reviewing the evaluation process

2010-04-27 Thread Ted Dunning
When mentoring, I also try to provide some gentle help on this by answering any privately sent code questions in public by redirecting to the mailing list. I also send a gentle nudge pointing out that my answer is on the mailing list and that they would get a faster answer on average if they asked

Re: Reviewing the evaluation process

2010-04-27 Thread Ross Gardler
On 27/04/2010 14:05, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: ...More or less, here's what I tell them: 1. I won't answer any development questions privately... 2. The stuff I will answer privately has to do with you... I like this - I did work like t

Re: Reviewing the evaluation process

2010-04-27 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > ...More or less, here's what I tell them: > 1. I won't answer any development questions privately... > 2. The stuff I will answer privately has to do with you... I like this - I did work like that when mentoring students, without spelling

Re: Reviewing the evaluation process

2010-04-27 Thread Grant Ingersoll
Two cents on a slightly different, but related subject. I interviewed 3 different people this year and as part of that laid out my basic "mentoring" philosophy and each seemed a bit surprised by it at first (but they quickly get why), but to me it is a reflection of the Apache Way. More or les