AFAICT it's possible for one or two spaces to appear at the start of
an encoded string.
(Spaces cannot appear at the end)
This won't matter if the encoding is only ever converted into a QR code.
But it seems a strange choice to allow spaces ...
On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 at 17:17, Bernd Eckenfels wrote
On Sun, 27 Jun 2021 at 14:06, Torsten Curdt wrote:
>
> > feels like both a horror show and an exercise in futility
>
>
> Can you expand on that - I don't understand the horror or the futility.
>
> It certainly is a bit of code smell - but only because there is no quick
> way to harden the implemen
On Sun, 27 Jun 2021 at 15:01, sebb wrote:
>
> On Sun, 27 Jun 2021 at 14:06, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> >
> > > feels like both a horror show and an exercise in futility
> >
> >
> > Can you expand on that - I don't understand the horror or the futility.
the error.
Care must be taken however not to catch every RTE, lest this hide a coding bug.
It may take a few iterations to catch and wrap all the possible RTEs,
but the end result would be a more robust and easier to use component.
Sebb
[1] It's not unknown for files to be temporarily loc
On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 at 21:24, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I'm sorry, but I'm unable to see what would or would not work for the
> people who chimed in. Short of calling for a vote, lets try with a poll
> that could show whether there is some sort of solution that is
> acceptable to everybody.
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 10:28, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> On 2021-07-13, Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote:
>
> > I think I used this page when publishing the site?
>
>
> > http://commons.apache.org/site-publish.html
>
> Yes, that's what I've done for the past releases as well ;-)
>
> https://cms.apache.org
Found a solution after all: the buildbot failed to trigger the site
build, so the publish picked up the old site.
I triggered it manually, and then republished.
I think it's OK now.
But we will need to fix the buildbot or create a replacement script.
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 11:04, sebb
e commands locally...
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 11:26, sebb wrote:
>
> Found a solution after all: the buildbot failed to trigger the site
> build, so the publish picked up the old site.
>
> I triggered it manually, and then republished.
>
> I think it's OK now.
>
&g
On Wed, 14 Jul 2021 at 10:03, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Is it correct that
> $ mvn site site:stage
> and
> $ mvn
> behave differently (i.e. that the latter would not run "CheckStyle" or
> that it generates warnings instead of errors)?
Depends on what the POM defines as the default ta
On Wed, 14 Jul 2021 at 10:29, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Le mer. 14 juil. 2021 à 11:16, sebb a écrit :
> >
> > On Wed, 14 Jul 2021 at 10:03, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > Is it correct that
> > > $ mvn site s
ou wrote the code -- any idea how to fix it
for AdoptOpenJDK?
Sebb
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
d
>
>
> --
> http://bernd.eckenfels.net
>
> Von: Gary Gregory
> Gesendet: Monday, July 26, 2021 2:57:35 PM
> An: sebb
> Cc: CommonsDev
> Betreff: Re: [NET] FTPSClientTest fails on AdoptOpenJDK 8 & 11
>
> Hm, there might be some sy
gt; the test code seems to limit the client to TLS1 only. Not sure why it does
> that, if we remove it, it should probably run with most sane JDKs.
>
Well spotted. That appears to have been the problem.
>
> Gruss
>
> Bernd
>
> --
>
> https://bernd.eckenfels.net
&g
On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 00:35, wrote:
>
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> ggregory pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-net.git
>
> commit bdfbd0cc7294d9d7d494f4148722f5c5dce43eaa
> Author: Gary Gregory
On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 01:17, sebb wrote:
>
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 00:35, wrote:
> >
> > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
> >
> > ggregory pushed a commit to branch master
> > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repo
On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 13:54, Suraj Singh wrote:
>
> Hello,
> The beanutil JAR has a dependency on commons-collection v3.2.2. This version
> was released in 2015 and is EOL.
> Do you have any plans to use more recent versions of commons-collections4?
The dependency is only needed for tests, so u
?
Sebb.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 16:05, sebb wrote:
>
> Something strange is going on with the FTPSClientTest.
>
> One my macOS system, the original jks file works with all my Java
> installations:
> Java 8 (Oracle and AdoptOpenJDK)
> Java 11 (Oracle and AdoptOpenJDK)
> Ja
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 at 13:43, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 7:38 PM sebb wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 16:05, sebb wrote:
> > >
> > > Something strange is going on with the FTPSClientTest.
> > >
> > > One my macO
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 at 14:22, sebb wrote:
>
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 at 13:43, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 7:38 PM sebb wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 16:05, sebb wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Something stra
On Wed, 4 Aug 2021 at 03:27, Matt Juntunen wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I apologize if this was resolved already and I missed it, but did we
> land anywhere on the issue of whether or not to release binaries of
> example code modules? I've included the example module binaries in
> previous releases of nu
On Wed, 4 Aug 2021 at 13:38, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Le mer. 4 août 2021 à 04:27, Matt Juntunen a
> écrit :
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I apologize if this was resolved already and I missed it, but did we
> > land anywhere on the issue of whether or not to release binaries of
> > example c
The hash links for 2.4.3 and 1.6 are broken.
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 at 15:53, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> The Apache Commons Pool team is pleased to announce the release of
> Apache Commons Pool 2.11.0.
>
> Apache Commons Pool provides an object-pooling API and a number of
> object pool implementations.
56
and
sha256
> Gary
>
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2021, 18:01 sebb wrote:
>
> > The hash links for 2.4.3 and 1.6 are broken.
> >
> > On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 at 15:53, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > >
> > > The Apache Commons Pool team is pleased to announce the release o
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 at 13:25, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> What would be a sufficient condition for removing the "AccurateMath"
> (previously named "FastMath") in the upcoming major release?
>
> I'd think that the following should hold (when running on JRE 11):
Math currently targets JRE
On Sun, 29 Aug 2021 at 01:07, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Le sam. 28 août 2021 à 14:36, sebb a écrit :
> >
> > On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 at 13:25, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > What would be a sufficient condition f
What commons component is involved here?
On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 at 13:37, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I get bit by this every time I try to make my markers "fancy" so I took the
> time this go around to open up a discussion :-)
>
> I want markers:
>
> Bob.children.John
> Bob.children.Jimmy
>
I'm inclined to agree with Gilles that updates to plugins should only
be noted where they affect users of the code, i.e. direct
dependencies.
The useful changes are being shouted down by the various plugin changes.
In particular, updates to actions are completely irrelevant as they
only affect ou
In case this affects your builds:
Infra say to use github.com instead
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Wrong mailing list?
On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 at 09:36, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> A small problem was discovered in 2.5.27 and I would like to quickly
> release 2.5.28 with the fix [1], then wait a few weeks and release
> another 2.5.x with Yasser's changes and close the 2.5.x line (if no
> more
On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 at 02:05, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Le jeu. 25 nov. 2021 à 01:35, sebb a écrit :
> >
> > In case this affects your builds:
>
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Commons/job/commons-math/160/console
>
> >
> > Infra say to use github.com i
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 08:08, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
>
> And just to clarify one thing: by drop I mean moving the project into
> the attic, I still would like to extract some stuff (like benchmarks)
> into the code hosted at Github.
Only TLPs can be moved to the Attic.
Commons components can be mov
> Date: Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 7:19 PM
> Subject: [commons-net] branch master updated: Prevent serialization
> To: comm...@commons.apache.org
>
>
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> sebb pushed a commit to branch master
> in reposi
ot.
If it were a human sending even a few of these messages we would have
banned them long ago.
Sebb.
On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 at 23:33, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> There is nothing to fix in Maven: Maven does not create a branch, run the
> GitHub Actions builds, and email you a report. Maven t
On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 at 13:54, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> One critical feature is that dependabot does all the builds for you on
> GitHub Actions, this is an enormous time and resource saver!
Not at all.
Just the reverse.
It does NOT save resources, because it runs builds for updates that
are not ne
On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 at 14:18, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 9:07 AM sebb wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 at 13:54, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > >
> > > One critical feature is that dependabot does all the builds for you on
> > > Gi
github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
> >
> >
> >> Le mer. 29 déc. 2021 à 15:18, Gary Gregory a
> >> écrit :
> >>
Genuine question: has Dependabot alerted us to any security issues?
If so which ones, and was it the only alert mechanism for that issue?
Sebb
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands
om> | Github
> > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
> > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
> >
> >
> > Le mer. 29 déc. 2021 à 16:27, Gary Gregor
On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 at 14:53, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 9:42 AM sebb wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 at 14:18, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 9:07 AM sebb wrote:
> > >
> > > >
On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 at 14:49, Xeno Amess wrote:
>
> log4j2 recently, in vfs...
Log4j2 would have been known about without Dependabot.
> sebb 于2021年12月29日周三 22:48写道：
>
> > Genuine question: has Dependabot alerted us to any security issues?
> >
> > If so which o
ssue is *not* about robot or no robot.
It is about this particular robot that causes so much noise.
>
>
> > On Dec 29, 2021, at 1:57 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> On 12/29/21 8:43 AM, sebb wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 at 14:53, G
tps://docs.github.com/en/code-security/supply-chain-security/keeping-your-dependencies-updated-automatically/configuration-options-for-dependency-updates>
> >
>
> +1
>
> > --
> > Matt Sicker
> >
> >>> On Dec 30, 2021, at 16:48, Rob Tompkins wrote:
> >&
ra can be persuaded to keep the SVN location
where it is.
I have yet to see a convincing reason why it must be dropped.
Indeed I have seen reference to the removal being 'self-imposed'.
If it is removed, a lot of (unnecessary) work will be involved
updating all the POMs.
Sebb
> HTH
&
again, I see 45 files on the Github search.
>
> On 2022/01/12 13:12:40 Gavin McDonald wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2022/01/12 12:11:40 sebb wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Or hopefully never, if Infra can be persuaded to keep the SVN location
> > > where it is.
&g
2: cannot force a build via IRC as the bots are not listening
on the channel
Failure 3: a change to the SVN source does not seem to trigger the job
> On 2022/01/12 13:27:17 sebb wrote:
> > Yes, all the component POMs will need to be updated.
> >
> > It's possible that there are
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 at 16:17, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2022/01/13 11:29:16 sebb wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 at 13:47, Gavin McDonald wrote:
> > >
> > > Ok, like I said, not worried about this for now, something for later, for
> > > the now
On Sun, 16 Jan 2022 at 10:04, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2022/01/13 16:52:26 sebb wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 at 16:17, Gavin McDonald wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2022/01/13 11:29:16 sebb wrote:
> > >
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 at 01:16, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> > [...]
> >
> > One more practical question: since the tests are not anymore based on the
> > methods name and are indicated by annotations now, I've seen tests without
> > this "test" in the beginning. Looks like common practice
Wrong list?
On Fri, 18 Feb 2022 at 12:49, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> To help with automatic collection of tasks for GSoC[1] INFRA is
> willing to add fields to our JIRA template.
>
> Proposal:
> * (multi-valued) "potential-mentor" [DONE]
> * (enumeration) "difficulty-level"
>
> Please
On Sun, 6 Mar 2022 at 22:46, Alex Herbert wrote:
>
> The current build plugin template:
>
> issue-tracking-template.xml
>
> Contains this line:
>
> "For more information on subversion and creating patches see the
> https://www.apache.org/dev/contributors.html";>Apache
> Contributors Guide"
>
to superseded
Java 8 versions]
I am happy to do the work.
Sebb
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
As for DBCP, I wonder if there are likely to be any updates to the
earlier versions of Pool?
Sebb
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
release directories.
This would mean changes to various scripts etc, so would not be trivial.
If we do decide to do so, it would make sense to try this on a
component that normally only has one current version on release.
WDYT?
Sebb
On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 at 22:26, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Le mer. 16 mars 2022 à 19:00, Mark Thomas a écrit :
> >
> > On 16/03/2022 17:53, sebb wrote:
> > > As the subject says.
> > >
> > > We currently use separate directories for binaries and sou
great (*)
See: https://s.apache.org/asfyaml-gha
e.g. update .asf.yaml to include:
notifications:
...
jobs: notificati...@commons.apache.org
Sebb.
(*) Travis always had this, but recently switched to a new email
system which means all such mails have to be moderated
On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 at 13:57, Matt Juntunen wrote:
>
> Hi Sebb,
>
> Yep, geometry is still using Travis. I've never used GitHub Actions so
> I'm not sure what it's capable of. Are there any specific features it
> provides that are driving the migration to it? Or i
existing workflows from another
component and adjust slightly.
> -Rob
>
> > On Mar 29, 2022, at 10:19 AM, sebb wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 at 13:57, Matt Juntunen
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Sebb,
> >>
> >> Yep, geometry is s
eed to raise this with Infra: us...@infra.apache.org
> Eric Bresie
> ebre...@gmail.com (mailto:ebre...@gmail.com)
>
> > On March 29, 2022 at 6:21:53 AM CDT, sebb > (mailto:seb...@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > It looks like there is a general move to switch from Travis to GitHub
On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 at 14:31, wrote:
>
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> markt pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-net.git
>
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
>
/dist/dev/commons/commons-parent/53-RC1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
KEYS:
https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
This is a lazy vote; no need to respond unless there are some issues.
This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now.
[ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
Thank you,
Sebb
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022, 12:55 sebb wrote:
>
> > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements
> > since Apache Commons Parent 52 was released, so I would like to
> > release Apache Commons Parent 53.
> >
> > Apache Commons Parent 53 RC1 is ava
On Sat, 2 Apr 2022 at 17:16, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We just released our release tool, Apache Commons Release Plugin Version
> 1.8.0:
> An Apache Maven Mojo for Apache Commons Release tasks.
>
> Historical list of changes:
> https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-release-plugin//changes-report
e too long to change them. There is
then the task of updating the websites.
Sebb
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Over 72 hours have now elapsed since the vote was started, and there
have been no -1 votes, so the vote passes 'nem. con.'.
I will perform the release shortly.
Sebb
On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 at 17:55, sebb wrote:
>
> We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enha
ib.version ->
commons.biz.aQute.bndlib.version.
Changes:
o Bump lots of plugin versions; see Release Notes
[1] for details
Sebb
[1] https://downloads.apache.org/commons/commons-parent/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
-
To unsubs
On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 at 18:54, Melloware wrote:
>
> And and I have forked it and deployed to Maven Central
>
>
>com.melloware
>commons-beanutils2
>2.0.0
>
>
Did you change the package names?
If not, there will be problems in the future if a project depends on
both via different depe
On Thu, 5 May 2022 at 21:57, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Le jeu. 5 mai 2022 à 22:24, Jochen Wiedmann
> a écrit :
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > trying to run the unit tests for commons-crypto, I get the error message
> >
> > Native library is not loaded
> >
> > I understand, what it tells me. However, I
I suggest the Pom is commented accordingly
On Sat, 21 May 2022 at 14:48, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> -1
>
> Please stop updating checkstyle to 10.2 because it breaks the build as
> 10.2 requires Java 11.
>
> Gary
>
> On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 7:04 PM wrote:
> >
> > This is an automated email from the
On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 at 12:46, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Hi All:
>
> Can someone explain the mess that is now the GitHub build? Is someone fixing
> it?
AFAICT it's not actually broken.
> We used to have a macOS and Ubuntu build, these now do not run it seems.
What makes you say that?
I just com
On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 at 17:34, sebb wrote:
>
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 at 12:46, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > Hi All:
> >
> > Can someone explain the mess that is now the GitHub build? Is someone
> > fixing it?
>
> AFAICT it's not actually broken.
On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 at 16:26, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> The component name was indeed ill chosen for what is effectively an
> OpenSSL wrapper. Maybe we could make that obvious on the site by
> calling the page "Apache Commons Crypto, an OpenSSL wrapper".
>
> I am in favor of adding more
ne via the existing Dockerfile. I don't
> see any reason to move away from the current release strategy.
Are you saying that the Dockerfile allows any developer to generate the build?
e.g. I have macOs but not Windows, so can I use Docker to build the
release to support Windows?
> On T
> now).
But unless one can host macOS on Windows or vice-versa, AFAICT it will
still require two hosts to generate a release.
> —
> Matt Sicker
>
> > On Jun 15, 2022, at 05:10, sebb wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 15 Jun 2022 at 01:20, Alex Remily wrote:
> >>
&g
we eliminate one of the files?
Sebb
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
022 at 1:07 PM Jochen Wiedmann
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 7:00 PM sebb wrote:
> >
> > > [1] src/docker/Dockerfile
> > > [2] src/conf/Docker/Dockerfile-luw
> >
> > Have to admit, that I wasn't aware of [2], when I created [1]. Mine is
On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 at 18:21, Alex Remily wrote:
>
> Forwarding to the community dev list. Didn't realize it was dropped along
> the way.
>
> Alex
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: Alex Remily
> Date: Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 1:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [Crypto] What is it ?
> To: Jochen
Could the native bits be extracted from the various GH builds and used
to pre-populate the release build?
Would that be allowed, given that builds are normally done on developer systems?
Sebb
On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 at 21:25, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Sure, but we are not quite set up for rel
On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 at 21:47, Alex Remily wrote:
>
> I think that's a great idea, assuming as Gary pointed out that using a
> MacVM for the build is legal (and I can't imagine AWS offering that service
> if it wasn't).
But is it OK to build ASF releases on GH rather than developer systems?
> Use
On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 at 22:07, Alex Remily wrote:
>
> sebb,
>
> Thanks for taking the time to test it out and provide feedback. Much
> appreciated. My thoughts below.
>
> container and it's not obvious how to extract it.>
>
> Good point. I could modify the s
As the subject says - maybe we should update from v24 to v26
Sebb
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
On Fri, 17 Jun 2022 at 14:22, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Le ven. 17 juin 2022 à 15:16, sebb a écrit :
> >
> > As the subject says - maybe we should update from v24 to v26
>
> Why not?
I don't know if there are any contra-indications, which
The win32 profile build seems to work OK, but is there a need for it?
If so, it can be added to build.sh; otherwise the profile and other
references should be dropped.
The mac32 profile build fails, and looks to be difficult to fix.
We should remove it.
Sebb
, so the
output is generated on the host.
This means it is easy to make source changes; the Docker build should
rarely need updating.
For details, please see
https://github.com/apache/commons-crypto/tree/sebb-docker/src/docker
To try it, check out the sebb-docker branch and cd src/docker
It
I think there used to be a page listing what changes were allowed when
changing major, minor and patch version numbers.
This may have been in the Wiki rather than the main website.
I could not find it just now, but have not spent much time looking for it.
If/when it is found, it probably needs to
On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 at 14:35, Alex Remily wrote:
>
> Sebb,
>
> I cloned your repo and ran the dockerfile. Feedback:
>
> The Maven download link is broken. It appears Apache updated to 3.8.6 on
> the 17th. I think the 3.6.3 build is less likely (although still not
> cer
On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 at 15:26, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> It is OK with me because _binary_ compatibility is what matters most and
> that is maintained.
>
> If you are compiling your code against a new version of a library, then
> changing source files is fair game IMO.
I agree that binary compatibil
ion.
Did you try the sebb-docker branch again after my last reply?
I think you must have used a different checkout when you reported the failures.
> Developers can easily modify as needed for their own purposes. I recommend
> removing the 32-bit Mac build profile from the POM, but have
see no reason to have both.
> updated.>
>
> As of this PR, it's in the POM but not in the dockerfile.
Sorry, you are right.
I thought I saw '32-bit build' but it was actually '32-bit Mac build'. Oops.
We have already decided to drop that.
> I see that you did a
disk space.
On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 at 00:20, Alex Remily wrote:
>
>
>
> Then I was definitely looking at the wrong version of your file. I'll
> circle back and run it again.
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 5:52 PM sebb wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 22:32
on't know that I share those concerns, but that was the
> rationale for using the older base.
I see.
Hopefully not an issue anymore?
> Otherwise, it seems ready to commit and close out 120 and 132.
>
> Alex
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 5:52 PM sebb wrote:
>
> > On
I've merged the docker build into the default branch.
It may not be perfect, but it does work well enough!
On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 at 17:14, sebb wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 at 15:59, Alex Remily wrote:
> >
> > I went back and reviewed docker setup at your link:
> >
JSON files don't support comments, so it's not feasible to add an AL
header to them.
So rather than have to add such excludes at component level, it might
be a good idea to update the parent POM.
Any objections?
Sebb
--
On Mon, 27 Jun 2022 at 13:40, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> Le lun. 27 juin 2022 à 01:18, Alex Herbert a écrit
> :
> >
> > On Sun, 26 Jun 2022 at 21:27, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Strangely I am not receiving emails from GH actions (or jenkins) to
> > > infor
interface instance. This should only
affect non-public classes.
Any other suggestions?
Sebb
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Seems to me we should deprecate the code that supports OpenSSL 1.0.x
for the next release.
Then drop it at the first proper opportunity (major release?)
Agreed?
Sebb
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
va:252)
...
It would certainly be easier to ignore the problem for now.
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2022, 06:59 sebb wrote:
>
> > It looks like macOS 10.5+ and Windows (latest) use LibreSSL by default
> > rather than OpenSSL.
> >
> > The LibreSSL API does not h
stop, so the fact that it has stopped
working for macOS and Windows is less of an issue.
But I don't think we can say we are not supporting LibreSSL at all.
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 10:21 AM sebb wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 29 Jun 2022 at 14:17, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > >
> >
the current or a later release. If we don't fix this
release, obviously it needs some mention in the release notes.
Sebb
https://github.com/apache/commons-crypto/actions/runs/2586011129
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2022, 12:00 sebb wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 29 Jun 2022 at 16:11, A
27;s unreasonable to expect
> > > users to install a supported version of OpenSSL on a supported
> > > architecture
> > > as a precondition of using commons crypto. I think it could become
> > > cumbersome to try and support every vendor default *SSL install. Tha
601 - 700 of 6466 matches
Mail list logo
