Re: [Math] Next release: 4.0 or 3.5 ?

On 8 January 2015 at 00:43, Gilles wrote: > On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 14:46:19 +0000, sebb wrote: >> >> On 7 January 2015 at 08:23, luc wrote: >>> >>> Le 2015-01-06 23:13, Gilles a écrit : >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, 06 Jan 2015 23:10

[MATH] Jenkins build

I've had to give up trying to get Continuum to use Git, so I set up a Jenkins build for Math It seems Jenkins itself needs Java 1.6+, and the JAVA_1_x_HOME variables don't seem to have been set up on the Jenkins hosts, so the -Pjava-1.5 profile does not work as is. However I found that the JAVA_1

Re: [math] Arrays.copyOf is Java 1.6+

/asf/commons-math/repo >> Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-math/commit/6a82f925 >> Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-math/tree/6a82f925 >> Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-math/diff/6a82f925 >> >> Bra

Re: [math] Arrays.copyOf is Java 1.6+

On 8 January 2015 at 11:45, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 01/08/2015 12:25 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 8 January 2015 at 11:13, Thomas Neidhart >> wrote: >>> On 01/08/2015 11:22 AM, s...@apache.org wrote: >>>> Repository: commons-math >>>> Upda

Re: [Math] Maven profile for running the examples?

On 8 January 2015 at 11:59, Gilles wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 01:20:20 +0000, sebb wrote: >> >> On 8 January 2015 at 00:25, Gilles wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 17:21:33 +, sebb wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 7 January 2

[All] Animal sniffer (was: [math] Arrays.copyOf is Java 1.6+)

On 8 January 2015 at 16:13, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 01/08/2015 04:44 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 8 January 2015 at 11:45, Thomas Neidhart >> wrote: >>> On 01/08/2015 12:25 PM, sebb wrote: >>> We certainly need to add animal-sniffer to our release building

Re: [All] Animal sniffer (was: [math] Arrays.copyOf is Java 1.6+)

On 8 January 2015 at 17:29, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > > Send from my mobile device > >> Am 08.01.2015 um 17:38 schrieb Thomas Neidhart : >> >>> On 01/08/2015 05:24 PM, sebb wrote: >>>> On 8 January 2015 at 16:13, Thomas Neidhart >>>> wro

Re: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.4.1

Just noticed - several test errors here: See On 8 January 2015 at 19:24, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Math 3.4.1 from release > candidate 1. > > Tag name: > MATH_3_4_1_RC1 (signature can be check

Re: [All] Animal sniffer (was: [math] Arrays.copyOf is Java 1.6+)

On 8 January 2015 at 21:21, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 01/08/2015 07:12 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 8 January 2015 at 17:29, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >>> >>> >>> Send from my mobile device >>> >>>> Am 08.01.2015 um 17:38 schrieb Thomas Neidhart :

Re: [All] Animal sniffer (was: [math] Arrays.copyOf is Java 1.6+)

ROR] strategy = org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.strategy.SelfFirstStrategy [ERROR] urls[0] = file:/Users/sebb/.m2/repository/org/codehaus/mojo/animal-sniffer-maven-plugin/1.13/animal-sniffer-maven-plugin-1.13.jar [ERROR] urls[1] = file:/Users/sebb/.m2/repository/org/codehaus/mojo/animal-sniffer/1.13/ani

Re: [All] Animal sniffer (was: [math] Arrays.copyOf is Java 1.6+)

On 9 January 2015 at 00:47, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > Am Fri, 9 Jan 2015 00:38:31 + > schrieb sebb : > >> Just tried the animal sniffer on NET (Java 1.5) - I added a call to >> new IOException(new Exception()) which is Java 1.6+ > > What Java did you use to sta

[MATH] src/userguide/pom.xml does not use Commons Parent

As the subject says. This makes it very tricky to compile & test with anything other than the Maven JVM. Recent versions of Maven require 1.6. Any objections to adding CP 36 as a parent? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...

Re: [MATH] src/userguide/pom.xml does not use Commons Parent

On 9 January 2015 at 04:44, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/8/15 7:02 PM, sebb wrote: >> As the subject says. >> >> This makes it very tricky to compile & test with anything other than >> the Maven JVM. >> Recent versions of Maven require 1.6. >> >> An

Re: [All] Animal sniffer (was: [math] Arrays.copyOf is Java 1.6+)

On 9 January 2015 at 10:01, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 01/09/2015 02:00 AM, sebb wrote: >> On 9 January 2015 at 00:47, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: >>> Am Fri, 9 Jan 2015 00:38:31 +0000 >>> schrieb sebb : >>> >>>> Just tried the animal sniffe

Re: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.4.1

On 9 January 2015 at 04:23, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/8/15 3:28 PM, sebb wrote: >> Just noticed - several test errors here: >> >> See <https://builds.apache.org/job/Commons%20Math/14/changes> > > What JDK is being used there? Java 1.5 latest. However the next r

Re: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.4.1

On 9 January 2015 at 13:53, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Luc, > > Luc Maisonobe wrote: > >> This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Math 3.4.1 from release >> candidate 1. >> >> Tag name: >> MATH_3_4_1_RC1 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag -v') >> >> Tag URL: >> >>

Re: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.4.1

On 9 January 2015 at 17:21, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/9/15 10:06 AM, James Carman wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> >>> No, must be some issue with the environment or JDK. I get >>> consistent, stable success under both Ant and Maven using the 1.5 >>> JDK above. >>

Re: svn commit: r1650603 - /commons/cms-site/trunk/content/xdoc/commons-parent-pom.xml

iables. > > Gruss > Bernd > > Am Fri, 09 Jan 2015 17:14:09 - > schrieb s...@apache.org: > >> Author: sebb >> Date: Fri Jan 9 17:14:08 2015 >> New Revision: 1650603 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1650603 >> Log: >> Bring java

[MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

Of the last 6 runs, only 1 had a problem with unit test failures. All the builds ran on ubuntu3, apart from the failure which ran on H10. This may have some bearing on the result; I don't yet know. I had a quick look at 2 tests that failed: SimpleRegressionTest.testPerfect SimpleRegressionTest.

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

On 9 January 2015 at 23:48, sebb wrote: > Of the last 6 runs, only 1 had a problem with unit test failures. > > All the builds ran on ubuntu3, apart from the failure which ran on H10. > This may have some bearing on the result; I don't yet know. > > I had a quick look

Re: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.4.1

On 9 January 2015 at 21:27, Jörg Schaible wrote: > sebb wrote: > >> On 9 January 2015 at 13:53, Jörg Schaible wrote: >>> Hi Luc, >>> >>> Luc Maisonobe wrote: >>> >>>> This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Math 3.4.1 from release

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

On 10 January 2015 at 01:01, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/9/15 5:32 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 9 January 2015 at 23:48, sebb wrote: >>> Of the last 6 runs, only 1 had a problem with unit test failures. >>> >>> All the builds ran on ubuntu3, apart from the failure whic

Re: [VALIDATOR] Ready for 1.4.1 RC3?

, but I don't think I changed anything that would affect that. > Benedikt > > 2015-01-06 12:19 GMT+01:00 sebb : > >> Just realised there are some issues with the IDN changes I added. >> >> 1) Maximum Length checking. This is currently done become conversion >> to

Re: [VOTE] Release Aoache Commons Validator 1.4.1 based on RC3

txt >> >> I have tested this with JDK 1.6, 1.7 and 1.8 using maven 3.2.5. >> >> Site (some links my be broken but will be fixed when the site is deployed): >> http://people.apache.org/~britter/validator-1.4.1-RC3/ >> >> Clirr Report: >> http://peop

Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Commons Math #17

That's another H10 build On 10 January 2015 at 23:15, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > See > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additio

Re: [VOTE] Release Aoache Commons Validator 1.4.1 based on RC3

Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_71\jre > Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252 > OS name: "windows 7", version: "6.1", arch: "amd64", family: "windows" > > +1 > > Gary > > > On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Gary G

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

On 11 January 2015 at 18:19, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/10/15 10:49 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 1/9/15 6:09 PM, sebb wrote: >>> On 10 January 2015 at 01:01, Phil Steitz wrote: >>>> On 1/9/15 5:32 PM, sebb wrote: >>>>> On 9 January 2015 at 23:48, sebb

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

On 11 January 2015 at 22:10, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/11/15 11:19 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 1/10/15 10:49 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> On 1/9/15 6:09 PM, sebb wrote: >>>> On 10 January 2015 at 01:01, Phil Steitz wrote: >>>>> On 1/9/15 5:32 PM,

Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Commons Math #22

Note: the build ran on H10 On 11 January 2015 at 21:14, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > See > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For addit

Re: svn commit: r1650930 - /commons/proper/vfs/trunk/NOTICE.txt

On 11 January 2015 at 18:38, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/11/15 10:33 AM, e...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: ecki >> Date: Sun Jan 11 17:33:44 2015 >> New Revision: 1650930 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1650930 >> Log: >> notice: add pointer to sandbox/NOTICE.txt, update copyright year >> >> Modif

Re: svn commit: r1651118 - /commons/proper/collections/trunk/pom.xml

On 12 January 2015 at 15:25, wrote: > Author: tn > Date: Mon Jan 12 15:25:06 2015 > New Revision: 1651118 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1651118 > Log: > Remove cobertura plugin -> switched to jacoco. There is support for Jacoco and/or Cordova in the Commons Parent. No need to configure anythi

Re: [math] Added a simpler perfect fit test that verifies slope standard error identically 0.

On H10 this fails with testPerfect2(org.apache.commons.math3.stat.regression.SimpleRegressionTest) Time elapsed: 0 sec <<< FAILURE! java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<0.0> but was: at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88) at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:743) at org.junit.Assert.as

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

On 12 January 2015 at 18:11, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/12/15 10:50 AM, sebb wrote: >> On 11 January 2015 at 22:10, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> On 1/11/15 11:19 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>>> On 1/10/15 10:49 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>>>> On 1/9/15 6:09 PM, s

[MATH] SimpleRegression - inconsistent use of sumXX?

External access to sumXX is via getXSumSquares() This returns NaN if n < 2. However there are some methods in the class that reference sumXX directly. They don't all check for n < 2 For example: getSumSquaredErrors getInterceptStdErr getSlopeStdErr getRegressionSumSquares regress(int[] vari

Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Commons Math #24

H11 this time On 12 January 2015 at 18:35, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > See > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional command

Re: Jenkins build is still unstable: Commons Math #25

Ubuntu 6 this time: testRegularizedBetaZeroPositivePositive(org.apache.commons.math3.special.BetaTest) Time elapsed: 0.007 sec <<< FAILURE! java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<0.0> but was: at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88) at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:743) at org.junit.A

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

On 12 January 2015 at 22:21, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 01/12/2015 11:17 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 1/12/15 2:30 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >>> On 01/12/2015 10:26 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >>>> On 01/12/2015 08:09 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>>>>

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

On 13 January 2015 at 00:53, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/12/15 5:44 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 12 January 2015 at 22:21, Thomas Neidhart >> wrote: >>> On 01/12/2015 11:17 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>>> On 1/12/15 2:30 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >>>>

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

On 13 January 2015 at 01:12, sebb wrote: > On 13 January 2015 at 00:53, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 1/12/15 5:44 PM, sebb wrote: >>> On 12 January 2015 at 22:21, Thomas Neidhart >>> wrote: >>>> On 01/12/2015 11:17 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>>>>

Re: Jenkins build is still unstable: Commons Math #28

ububtu-1 On 13 January 2015 at 02:17, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > See > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mai

Re: Jenkins build is back to stable : Commons Math #31

ubuntu3 On 13 January 2015 at 15:12, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > See > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: de

Re: Jenkins build is still unstable: Commons Math #29

H11 On 13 January 2015 at 09:15, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > See > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: de

Re: [Math] Maven profile for running the examples?

On 13 January 2015 at 12:44, Gilles wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 15:49:31 +0000, sebb wrote: >> >> On 8 January 2015 at 11:59, Gilles wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 01:20:20 +, sebb wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 8 January 201

Re: [Math] Maven profile for running the examples?

On 13 January 2015 at 18:40, Gilles wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 11:03:42 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: >> >> On 1/13/15 10:48 AM, sebb wrote: >>> >>> On 13 January 2015 at 12:44, Gilles wrote: >>>> >>>> On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 15:49:31 +, s

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

On 01/12/2015 10:26 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >>>>>> On 01/12/2015 08:09 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/12/15 11:37 AM, sebb wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12 January 2015 at 18:11, Phil Steitz wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 1/12

Re: [math] Enable jacoco again.

On 13 January 2015 at 10:04, wrote: > Repository: commons-math > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/master 3923fc10f -> 4e1958256 > > > Enable jacoco again. > > > Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-math/repo > Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-math/commit/4

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons Validator - Apache Commons (Group (shared) Maven 3 Build Definition (Java 1.6))

changed: > > /commons/proper/validator/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/validator/routines/DomainValidator.java > ( 1650777 ) > > Changed: britter @ Sat 10 Jan 2015 18:09:38 + > Comment: Fix typo > Files changed: > /commons/proper/validator/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES.txt (

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons Validator - Apache Commons (Group (shared) Maven 3 Build Definition (Java 1.6))

why that was not noticed before. On 13 January 2015 at 21:46, sebb wrote: > Yes. > Just updated my workspace and ran test and it failed. > > I've also updated Continuum to 1.6 and that failed too > > On 13 January 2015 at 21:41, Gary Gregory wrote: &g

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons Validator - Apache Commons (Group (shared) Maven 3 Build Definition (Java 1.6))

On 13 January 2015 at 22:02, sebb wrote: > Rats! Looks like a bug here: > > final String authorityASCII = DomainValidator.unicodeToASCII(authority); > > This is supposed to leave the input string along if it cannot convert > punycode, but it appears to have dropped the final &

[MATH] results on H11 using 1.5/6/7

https://builds.apache.org/job/Commons%20Math%20H10/38/console H11 - java6 - OK https://builds.apache.org/job/Commons%20Math%20H10/39/console H11 - java7 - OK https://builds.apache.org/job/Commons%20Math%20H10/40/console H11 - java5 - failed https://builds.apache.org/job/Commons%20Math%20H10/41/c

[ALL] Commons Parent - include Animal Sniffer?

I've been experimenting with Animal Sniffer in NET as a basic check that the code does not try to use method etc which are not present in the target Java version. [For example, java.net.IDN requires Java 1.6+] Although the plugin is not fool-proof, it should help to check basic errors and allow de

Re: [MATH] results on H11 using 1.5/6/7

ed with 1.6+ > >> On Jan 13, 2015, at 4:36 PM, sebb wrote: >> >> https://builds.apache.org/job/Commons%20Math%20H10/38/console >> H11 - java6 - OK >> >> https://builds.apache.org/job/Commons%20Math%20H10/39/console >> H11 - java7 - OK >> >>

Re: [ALL] Commons Parent - include Animal Sniffer?

On 14 January 2015 at 01:42, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 6:57 PM, sebb wrote: > >> I've been experimenting with Animal Sniffer in NET as a basic check >> that the code does not try to use method etc which are not present in >> the target

Re: [Math] Java version

On 14 January 2015 at 08:18, Martin Grotle Soukup wrote: > Hi, > > My two cents in favour of java 8: > > IIUC the next major release will break backwards compatibility and aims to > clean up the API. Taking a look at the release frequency of commons math > [1], it shows releases every 9-12 months

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons Validator - Apache Commons (Group (shared) Maven 3 Build Definition (Java 1.6))

On 14 January 2015 at 07:48, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > 2015-01-13 23:11 GMT+01:00 sebb : > >> On 13 January 2015 at 22:02, sebb wrote: >> > Rats! Looks like a bug here: >> > >> > final String authorityASCII = DomainValidator.unicodeToASCII(authority); >&g

Re: [ALL] Commons Parent - include Animal Sniffer?

en. > Did you resolve the problems you had with Java on MacOS? No, I've not looked into it. I should probably add a comment to CP in the animal sniffer section. > Thomas > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:57 AM, sebb wrote: > >> I've been experimenting with Animal Sniffer

Re: [All] Animal sniffer (was: [math] Arrays.copyOf is Java 1.6+)

On 9 January 2015 at 15:22, sebb wrote: > On 9 January 2015 at 10:01, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >> On 01/09/2015 02:00 AM, sebb wrote: >>> On 9 January 2015 at 00:47, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: >>>> Am Fri, 9 Jan 2015 00:38:31 + >>>> schrieb sebb : >&

Re: [ALL] Too much traffic on the "dev" ML

On 16 January 2015 at 10:49, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > If the volume of messages discourages new contributors from joining the > project that's indeed an issue. We had an average of 400 messages per > month in 2014, that's on par with maven-dev, half of tomcat-dev and 1/7 > of lucene-dev. > > I don'

Re: [ALL] Too much traffic on the "dev" ML

On 16 January 2015 at 11:16, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 16/01/2015 12:03, sebb a écrit : > >> Commits already have a separate list. > > Ah thanks, I thought they were merged. Maybe we could move the Wiki > notifications to the commits or notification lists, as well as the >

Re: [ALL] Too much traffic on the "dev" ML

On 16 January 2015 at 11:13, Gilles wrote: > On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 08:53:56 +0100, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >> >> Hi Gilles, >> >> 2015-01-16 1:47 GMT+01:00 Gilles : >> >>> Hi. >>> >>> In the discussion that started about RDF, it seems that the >>> traffic volume is a stumbling block. >>> [For some ti

Re: [ALL] Too much traffic on the "dev" ML

On 16 January 2015 at 11:21, sebb wrote: > On 16 January 2015 at 11:16, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >> Le 16/01/2015 12:03, sebb a écrit : >> >>> Commits already have a separate list. >> >> Ah thanks, I thought they were merged. Maybe we could move the Wik

Re: In FTP.java, i18n not supported.

On 16 January 2015 at 14:12, 이왕석 wrote: > My project is to make android app include ftp client function, so I use > Apache Commons net library. > > English encoding is not problem. but when I use korean, encoding is broken. > > I think FTP.java source code, 417 line, should have to update. > "set

Re: [ALL] Too much traffic on the "dev" ML

On 17 January 2015 at 14:23, Gilles wrote: > On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 16:00:45 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote: >> >> I agree - we're hung up on a clown from the 90s. It's so much >> simpler click watch on github and get notifications. Also >> stackoverflow has a much broader Java community and having traffic

Re: [ALL] Too much traffic on the "dev" ML

n bulk closing lots of issues, it's easy enough to suppress the email. > Mark > On Jan 17, 2015 8:11 AM, "Gilles" wrote: > >> On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:36:55 +0100, Gilles wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:00:34 +, sebb wrote: >>> >>>

Re: [ALL] Commons Parent - include Animal Sniffer?

On 17 January 2015 at 19:35, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 01/14/2015 12:57 AM, sebb wrote: >> I've been experimenting with Animal Sniffer in NET as a basic check >> that the code does not try to use method etc which are not present in >> the target Java version. >

Re: [ALL] Too much traffic on the "dev" ML

On 17 January 2015 at 22:18, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/17/15 3:11 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 17 January 2015 at 16:29, Mark Fortner wrote: >>> Bulk JIRA changes prior to a release tend to swamp the list. Perhaps it >>> would be better to close the issue as the work is do

Re: svn commit: r1652697 - in /commons/proper/commons-parent/trunk: pom.xml src/changes/changes.xml

On 18 January 2015 at 02:11, wrote: > Author: ecki > Date: Sun Jan 18 02:11:32 2015 > New Revision: 1652697 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1652697 > Log: > Added commons.osgi.excludeDependencies for bundle-plugin. Can you please document this in http://commons.apache.org/commons-parent-pom.htm

Re: [ALL] Bulk operations in Jira (Was: Re: [ALL] Too much traffic on the "dev" ML)

that this is restricted and that we have some people on >> the list who could use it (it is only rarely needed so we can request >> the execution by mail). >> > > I can confirm that there is an interface for doing bulk operation. Since > you can't see it, it must

[ALL] staging and production website commit mails now got to notifications@

It looks as though the notifications@commons.a.o mailing list is finally being used for: buildbot commits website publication This should reduce the noise on the commits@ mailing list considerably. Website source file commit mails are not affected; they are sent to commits@ as for any other sour

[ALL] Commons Parent - additional minimal site building profile?

Building the full site for a component can be quite time-consuming, which makes checking the documentation build tedious. Almost all the reports have "skip" parameters, so it's possible to build up a command that only builds the component docs. This can be saved as a shell script or alias. (Or def

Re: [ALL] Commons Parent - additional minimal site building profile?

On 20 January 2015 at 00:51, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/19/15 4:53 PM, sebb wrote: >> Building the full site for a component can be quite time-consuming, >> which makes checking the documentation build tedious. >> >> Almost all the reports have "skip" paramete

Re: [parent] Jira report and "improvements" type

ort for the next release or any idea how to > fix it? > > I have filed a bug report, here: > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHANGES-351 > > Gruss > Bernd > > > Am Sat, 20 Dec 2014 12:44:53 +0100 > schrieb Bernd Eckenfels : > >> Am Sat, 20 Dec 2014 11:35:30 +

Re: [math] Add temporary check for rare test failure.

On 21 January 2015 at 20:39, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 01/21/2015 05:32 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 1/21/15 3:43 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have re-run the jenkins build for commons-math after this change several >>> times, also on H10 and it seems the test failures have disap

Re: [LANG] Site build fails with CP 37-SNAPSHOT due to animal sniffer plugin

I don't have any problems on MacOSX. But I am using Maven 3.0.5, not 3.2.5 On 21 January 2015 at 21:37, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > Hello Benedikt, > > I tried it on my system (r1653307 + 37-SN) and it has the same > problem: > > 342827 [ERROR] Bad class file > C:\users\eckenfel\.m2\asf-repository\

Re: [LANG] Site build fails with CP 37-SNAPSHOT due to animal sniffer plugin

Just tried with Maven 3.2.5, also no problems. Try deleting the icu4j repo tree; maybe that is corrupt On 22 January 2015 at 00:05, sebb wrote: > I don't have any problems on MacOSX. > > But I am using Maven 3.0.5, not 3.2.5 > > On 21 January 2015 at 21:37, Bernd Eckenf

Re: [math] Add temporary check for rare test failure.

On 22 January 2015 at 01:59, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/21/15 4:56 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 21 January 2015 at 20:39, Thomas Neidhart >> wrote: >>> On 01/21/2015 05:32 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>>> On 1/21/15 3:43 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >>>>>

Re: [math] Add temporary check for rare test failure.

On 22 January 2015 at 11:44, sebb wrote: > On 22 January 2015 at 01:59, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 1/21/15 4:56 PM, sebb wrote: >>> On 21 January 2015 at 20:39, Thomas Neidhart >>> wrote: >>>> On 01/21/2015 05:32 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>>>>

Re: [math] Add temporary check for rare test failure.

de is not as efficient as it could be, because intVal has to be converted back to negative at the end. > Thomas > > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:44 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 22 January 2015 at 01:59, Phil Steitz wrote: >> > On 1/21/15 4:56 PM, sebb wrote: >> &

Re: [ALL] JIRA permissions for Kristian Rosenvold

On 20 January 2015 at 16:26, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2015-01-20, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: > >> Btw it still seems like my JIRA karma is a bit weak ? > > I'm not sure what you are missing, but I am sure I cannot provide it :-) > > JIRA Admins for Commons are Phil, Luc and Mark Struberg. Has th

Re: svn commit: r1650787 - /commons/proper/validator/trunk/pom.xml

On 10 January 2015 at 18:17, wrote: > Author: britter > Date: Sat Jan 10 18:17:54 2015 > New Revision: 1650787 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1650787 > Log: > Add missing build properties (according to release guide) > > Modified: > commons/proper/validator/trunk/pom.xml > > Modified: common

Re: [parent] Jira report and "improvements" type

On 20 January 2015 at 01:44, sebb wrote: > I get 141 if the Fix Version is limited to 2.1 By that I mean an Issue search using the JIRA GUI returns 141 entries. Unfortunately still above 100. VFS obviously needs to fix fewer bugs between releases! > You can add > > true > >

Re: [ALL] JIRA permissions for Kristian Rosenvold

On 22 January 2015 at 23:55, sebb wrote: > On 20 January 2015 at 16:26, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> On 2015-01-20, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: >> >>> Btw it still seems like my JIRA karma is a bit weak ? >> >> I'm not sure what you are missing, but I am sure

Re: [ALL] JIRA permissions for Kristian Rosenvold

On 23 January 2015 at 09:13, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 23/01/2015 09:10, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> On 2015-01-23, luc wrote: >> >>> Le 2015-01-23 04:00, sebb a écrit : >>>> On 22 January 2015 at 23:55, sebb wrote: >>>>> On 20 January 2015 at 16:26,

[ALL] Time for CP 37?

I think it's probably time to release Commons Parent 37. Any more quick fixes to be added, or is it OK to go? S. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apac

Re: [ALL] Time for CP 37?

On 23 January 2015 at 13:48, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > 2015-01-23 14:20 GMT+01:00 sebb : > >> I think it's probably time to release Commons Parent 37. >> >> Any more quick fixes to be added, or is it OK to go? >> > > I'd like to find out what i

Re: [ALL] Time for CP 37?

On 23 January 2015 at 14:52, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > 2015-01-23 15:10 GMT+01:00 sebb : > >> On 23 January 2015 at 13:48, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >> > 2015-01-23 14:20 GMT+01:00 sebb : >> > >> >> I think it's probably time to release Commons Parent 3

Re: svn commit: r1654500 - in /commons/proper/validator/trunk/src: changes/ main/java/org/apache/commons/validator/routines/ test/java/org/apache/commons/validator/routines/

On 24 January 2015 at 12:01, wrote: > Author: britter > Date: Sat Jan 24 12:01:20 2015 > New Revision: 1654500 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1654500 > Log: > VALIDATOR-358: Underscores in domain names are not supported. This fixes #3 > from github. Thanks to Nykolas Laurentino de Lima. -1 Th

Re: [ALL] Time for CP 37?

one can do mvn validate animal-sniffer:check but that is not ideal. On 24 January 2015 at 12:11, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > 2015-01-24 13:05 GMT+01:00 Benedikt Ritter : > >> >> >> 2015-01-23 16:39 GMT+01:00 sebb : >> >>> On 23 January 2015 at 14:52, Benedik

Re: [ALL] Time for CP 37?

Looks like the cobertura plugin is one source of the bad icu dependency This works: mvn site -Psite-basic This causes animal sniffer to fail mvn site -Psite-basic -Dcobertura.skip=false On 24 January 2015 at 13:13, sebb wrote: > I get the problem as well with mvn site. > > It l

Re: [ALL] Time for CP 37?

ed the updated SNAPSHOT - does Lang build for you now? On 24 January 2015 at 14:36, sebb wrote: > Looks like the cobertura plugin is one source of the bad icu dependency > > This works: > mvn site -Psite-basic > > This causes animal sniffer to fail > mvn site -Psite-basic -Dcobe

Re: [compress] Preparations for 1.10

On 25 January 2015 at 05:11, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2015-01-24, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: > >> After an intense few minutes discussing the color of the bike shed >> with myself (package name) I moved the zip-unspecific parallel stuff >> to org.apache.commons.compress.parallel in r1654572. > >

Re: svn commit: r1654500 - in /commons/proper/validator/trunk/src: changes/ main/java/org/apache/commons/validator/routines/ test/java/org/apache/commons/validator/routines/

On 25 January 2015 at 10:58, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hello sebb, > > 2015-01-24 13:16 GMT+01:00 sebb : > >> On 24 January 2015 at 12:01, wrote: >> > Author: britter >> > Date: Sat Jan 24 12:01:20 2015 >> > New Revision: 1654500 >>

[VOTE] (lazy consensus) Release Commons Parent 37

Hello All, The Apache Commons Parent POM provides common settings for all Apache Commons components. This is a VOTE to release Commons Parent 37 from RC2. This VOTE by LAZY-CONSENSUS is open for at least 72 hours until January 28 11:30 UTC. Changes in this version include: Update plugins, a

Re: [ALL] Time for CP 37?

:50 GMT+01:00 sebb : > >> I think I've solved the issue with the icu class. >> >> I had mistakenly added animal-sniffer to the test phase, however it >> defaults to process-classes. >> >> This phase occurs before the test phase when it appears that cobertura &

Re: svn commit: r1654500 - in /commons/proper/validator/trunk/src: changes/ main/java/org/apache/commons/validator/routines/ test/java/org/apache/commons/validator/routines/

On 25 January 2015 at 11:12, sebb wrote: > On 25 January 2015 at 10:58, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >> Hello sebb, >> >> 2015-01-24 13:16 GMT+01:00 sebb : >> >>> On 24 January 2015 at 12:01, wrote: >>> > Author: britter >>> >

Re: [VOTE][JCS] release [jcs] 2.0-beta-1 (take 3)

-1 I think the NOTICE file is incorrect. It should not mention LICENSE.txt. Nor should it mention XEROX, because the license does not contain any attribution requirement, AFAICT Any XEROX license should either be in LICENSE.txt or in a separate file linked from LICENSE.txt and it should be made

Re: [VOTE][JCS] release [jcs] 2.0-beta-1 (take 3)

> On 25.01.15 17:00, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>>> It does AFAIK - was not here and just propagated existing legal text - and >>>> that is why it is referenced in core and not all artifacts. >>>> Le 25 janv. 2015 16:55, "sebb" a écrit >>

Re: svn commit: r1654500 - in /commons/proper/validator/trunk/src: changes/ main/java/org/apache/commons/validator/routines/ test/java/org/apache/commons/validator/routines/

On 26 January 2015 at 07:30, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hello sebb, > > 2015-01-25 12:55 GMT+01:00 sebb : > >> On 25 January 2015 at 11:12, sebb wrote: >> > On 25 January 2015 at 10:58, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >> >> Hello sebb, >> >> >>

Re: [VOTE][JCS] release [jcs] 2.0-beta-1 (take 3)

gt; @rmannibucau > http://www.tomitribe.com > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > 2015-01-26 12:18 GMT+01:00 sebb : >> Why not just drop it entirely? >> >> If that is the only Xerox-licensed file, it is not essential to the >> op

Re: [VOTE][JCS] release [jcs] 2.0-beta-1 (take 3)

On 26 January 2015 at 11:30, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > @sebb: not sure I get it right, it references LICENSE.txt correctly for me Not sure what you mean by "it" above. As I already wrote: The NOTICE file should not reference LICENSE.txt Nor should it reference LICENSE.xerox, beca

<    6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   >