On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Sébastien Brisard
wrote:
>>> Does that mean that porting it into Commons-Math is possible
>>> (license-wise?). I would think it does…
>>
>> That seems explicitly restrictive to me. e.g. If I don't claim to be in the
>> general scientific community, the software h
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 30/08/2012 15:52, Simone Tripodi a écrit :
>> Hi all guys,
>>
>> new Apache Maven Fluido Skin is gonna be released soon, I started
>> experimenting locally how the _main_ commons site would look alike if
>> the new skin would be applied (w
Hi,
and just to say it clearly: i am very much +1 to finally add this skin.
Cheers
Christian
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Thanks to Christian Grobmeier, we also added the responsive bootstrap css.
>
> I re-uploaded the site, can you ple
Hi,
I am there too! (referring to ApacheCon EU)
Cheers
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Thomas Neidhart
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does anybody plan to go to ApacheCon 2012?
> Would be nice to meet each other there.
>
> Thomas
>
> -
> T
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Nov 14, 2012, at 2:03 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>
>>> 2012/11/14 Thomas Vandahl :
On 14.11.2012 08:40, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>
> Please, could someone who knows what to d
starting from 1. January. Just saw a final reminder from Infra.
Commons is surely a LOT of work.
I would like to suggest we act immediately.
In other terms: let us request a commons-test cms where we can try things
out and prepare the new sites.
As Ralph Goers has already mentioned, we have a s
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Bah, let's pick one component and start there and skip a test site.
But then there is only one component visible under the new commons.a.o?
> Gary
>
> On Dec 10, 2012, at 3:08, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
>> star
h from
commons.apache.org to the new site
> Gary
>
> On Dec 10, 2012, at 7:13, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> Bah, let's pick one component and start there and skip a test site.
>>
>> But then
e in
>> worse shape than Christian suggests - come Jan 1 we will be dark if
>> we don't get everything moved to svn pub-sub.
>>
>> Sorry if above is naive. The intent is to avoid a huge amount of
>> fiddling in a short period of time when quite a few component si
d the new repo with the "old" content. But I
>>> don't get why that has to be the case; because if it is, we are in
>>> worse shape than Christian suggests - come Jan 1 we will be dark if
>>> we don't get everything moved to svn pub-sub.
>>&g
Hi folks,
before 2 or 3 months we have voted to let BeanShell come to Commons.
There is this page:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeanShellProposal
But there was never a vote on the incubator list. Nor did I see any
sign of life from the original authors. Actually it seems to me this
project i
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> Another issue, I've noticed that the parent is defined as 28-SNAPSHOT,
> should it be simple 27 - the latest released version?
Not sure about the differences of these 2, but I think we cannot
release a stable version with a dependency to a -S
> Do you know how to exclude some files/directories from the rat-plugin
> scan ? Right now it includes .idea folder in the scan which produces
> mass of errors :\
have not tried yet, but it supports an "exclude" option in the configuration:
http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/rat-mojo.
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Thomas Neidhart
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to do a similar cleanup as for email also for logging and
> aim for a 1.2 release in the coming weeks. The things I have in mind:
>
> * update to Java 5
> * comply to default maven structure
> * update to Junit 4
>
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Thomas Neidhart
wrote:
> On 01/12/2013 05:37 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Thomas Neidhart
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I would like to do a similar cleanup as for email also for lo
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 12/01/2013 17:36, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
>> Basically I am +1 on moving to newer JDKs. But in this case I just see
>> use for old and older applications.
>> That said, I just checked and saw tomcat is sti
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 12/01/2013 19:29, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 12/01/2013 17:36, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>>
>>>> Basically I am +1 on moving to
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Thomas Neidhart
wrote:
>> I'm -1 on this change. I don't see any reason to do it. We don't need
>> features from a more recent Java version in commons-logging. As others
>> have said: most users of commons-logging are old and older apps.
>
> In general I am fine wi
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2013-01-13 19:14, t...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: tn
>> Date: Sun Jan 13 18:14:24 2013
>> New Revision: 1432688
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1432688&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Upgrade test dependencies: log4j 1.2.17, avalong-fr
Hey there,
I want to mention that I have reserved the G+ brand page "Apache Commons"
https://plus.google.com/106381282762520124070
At the moment we don't use such stuff, but we probably should do.
Anyway once I can transfer ownership of this page to Commons and once
this project wants to have tha
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 23/12/2011 09:32, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
>> I want to mention that I have reserved the G+ brand page "Apache Commons"
>> https://plus.google.com/106381282762520124070
>>
>> At the moment we
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 23/12/2011 11:15, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Luc Maisonobe
>> wrote:
>>> Le 23/12/2011 09:32, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
>>>> I want to mention that I hav
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 21.12.2011 17:41, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Phil Steitz
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> 1.5.x ships with tomcat and is used by lots of other production
>>> applica
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/21/11 11:09 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>>> On 21/12/2011 16:57, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>>> On 12/21/11 9:41 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>> OK, sorry if I ask the same question in the same dumb way all the
>> time... but we have figured out 1.5 will be binary compatible with
>> 1.6.
>> We can't we then simply drop 1.5 and go forward with 1.6?
>>
>> So far i have see the reason
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 23/12/2011 11:33, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
>> So far i have see the reason: Tomcat 5.5 runs with jdk1.4.2. Is this
>> actually the reason we don't go forward? Because another project needs
>> the 1.5 series?
here,
once this works out.
Cheers
Christian
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Le 23/12/2011 11:15, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
>>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Luc Maisonobe
>&g
ould we use?
The other projects I know or have heard of are doing all the stuff
manually (specifically a few volunteers of the PMC do)
Cheers
Christian
>
> Emmanuel Bourg
>
>
>
> Le 23/12/2011 09:32, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
>>
>> Hey there,
>>
>>
&
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Liviu Tudor wrote:
> Also perhaps things like voting on certain aspects of the ASF projects can
> be "broadcasted" via Twitter so users who are interested can get involved
> in the process on the dev ML?
> I don't think in the case of Commons, Twitter would help wi
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Gilles Sadowski
wrote:
> Hello.
>
>> Thank you for reserving the page Christian. In the same vein we
>> should probably register an Apache Commons account on Twitter.
>
> How useful/needed is it to establish a presence on multiple "social"
> platforms?
I would say
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/23/11 7:36 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 23/12/2011 11:33, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>> Releases would be more work but there are folks tha
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Gilles Sadowski
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 05:00:03PM +0100, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Gilles Sadowski
>> wrote:
>> > Hello.
>> >
>> >> Thank you for reserving the pag
MC positive replies (but not "+1"):
> Matt Benson: Commons Imaging
> Sebastian Bazley: Commons Imaging, Commons ImageIO
> Simone Tripodi: Commons ImageIO
>
> 3 Non-PMC positives:
> Christian Grobmeier: Commons ImageIO
> Damjan Jovanovic: Commons Imaging
> Konstantin
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 28/12/2011 11:06, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
>> just for the record, I am meanwhile on the pmc :-)
>> I was just not aware of the page below, I use:
>> http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#commons
Hello Simone,
interesting. If I understand correctly they basically use a
ConcurrentHashMap to put expression in it somewhere at parsing level?
Looking in the current code of ognl, i cannot see such a
functionality. Anyway, everything which is speeding up things is
welcome, imho (ok,almost) ;-)
C
Hello Gary,
thanks for the hard work!
While testing I saw there hashed asc files online, like:
commons-pool-1.6-sources.jar.asc.md5
To my knowledge they are not necessary and can be removed from Nexus
(just chose and remove).
Notice does include copyright until 2011, but tomorrow is 2012 ;-) Non
+1
and thanks again for your work!
Cheers
Christian
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Good day to you all:
>
> I have prepared Commons Pool 1.6-RC3.
>
> The only change from RC2 is that the build was run from a clean SVN
> checkout to avoid issues with using a mixed-revision
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Jan 7, 2012, at 11:44 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>
>> Le 07/01/2012 15:36, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>>>
>>> When can we drop support for M2?
>>
>> I guess there are still a lot of m2 users, and for the next few years
>> there will still be
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 12:23 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> I'm not sure how it is relevant whether commons users use maven 2 or 3.
>>> Even if we require Maven 3 to build a commons component anyone can still
>>> use it in a Maven 2 build. They only would require Maven 3 if they actually
>>> want to buil
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 08/01/2012 12:11, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
>> Out of curiosity: why can't you run m3 on debian linux? m3 is java,
>> you should be able to download it and place it in your path.
>
> I probably could. I s
Hello,
we have a nice wikipage mentioning what buildsystem is supported for
which component:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/BuildSystems
Can everybody update the lines for the components he is caring about?
For components which do not support maven3 just add a "no" in the
column - this way we kno
3855921
> Linkedin :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara
>
> Maurizio Cucchiara
>
>
> On 8 January 2012 13:50, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> we have a nice wikipage mentioning what buildsystem is supported for
>> which component:
>&
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Adrian Crum
wrote:
> Commons Convert isn't on the Sandbox list. It supports Ant and Maven 2.
Added it - thanks Adrian.
Cheers
Christian
>
> -Adrian
>
>
> On 1/8/2012 2:57 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>
>> This page is seriously out of date. I took a look at several co
oint here
>
> Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara
> G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921
> Linkedin :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara
>
> Maurizio Cucchiara
>
>
> On 8 January 2012 20:41, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
>
n Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>> Hi Maurizio,
>>
>> I have myself no karma to give you karma, sorry! But I can edit it for
>> OGNL of course - I think it is m3 ready (have only worked with m3 and
>> ognl so far). Do you know if it is w
Hello,
Jelly did not see any activity for nearly two years:
http://svnsearch.org/svnsearch/repos/ASF/search?path=%2Fcommons%2Fproper%2Fjelly
Last release was in 01.2010.
We had already discussion on a process to move proper components into
another state, be it "dormant" or "inactive". I would li
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara
wrote:
> On 8 January 2012 20:51, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> Could you try maven site too?
>
> I can confirm it works, though I just ran "mvn site", excluding the deploy
> phase (for obvious reasons) which I&#x
Question is how realistic is it we get something hacked together in
for example ruby?
Cheers
Christian
>
> Gary
>
> On Jan 9, 2012, at 6:59, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Jelly did not see any activity for nearly two years:
>> http://svnsearch.o
+1 and good luck ;-)
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Good day to you all:
>
> I have prepared Commons Pool 1.6-RC4.
>
> There is NO change from RC3.
>
> This RC exists because I blew up the Nexus staging repository for RC3
> and a new RC is needed for a clean release process
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> I think the whole formality of project state should be replaced with a
>>> live activ
d of having a fourth state.
It should be easy to put a component to sleep or wake it up again.
Probably not even moving them in svn, jsut indicating in a "components
health page" at commons.a.o
>
> Gary
>
>>
>>> 2c,
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>>
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> the main reason for the failed vote of commons-email-1.3 is that the release
> is only source but not binary compatible
>
> +) if you compile your application with the new version everything is fine
> +) if you replace simpl
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:54 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 10 January 2012 19:37, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> the main reason for the failed vote of commons-email-1.3 is that the relea
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:06 PM, sebb wrote:
>> The list is pretty concrete.
>> It does not say anything on binary compatibility (or i didn't find it).
>
> "Release B is said to be fully-compatible with Release A if B can
> simply replace A in (nearly) all circumstances and deployments without
> c
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:55 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 11 January 2012 11:42, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:06 PM, sebb wrote:
>>>> The list is pretty concrete.
>>>> It does not say anything on binary compatibility (or i didn't find
I am very much +1 what Hen and Simone said. Again.
As a volunteer I am here for making some cool stuff, but not to
satisfy the needs of companies who are using outdated jdks. Sometimes
it makes sense, but the "for ever support" of jdks becomes obsessive.
Rather I would prefer to work with cool te
56 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> 2011/12/16 Łukasz Lenart :
>> 2011/12/14 Christian Grobmeier :
>>> cool, thanks for the update. If you run out of time for some reason or
>>> see any other problems with the import, pls let me/us know. I gladly
>>> dedicate the cmd-c/
Actually Simone has already brought up a bootstrap'ped variant of the
Commons homepage I liked very much. Not sure what was the problem with
that. We should put it on our table again, as the current Commons site
looks like we are jdk 1.3 users (ok, we support 1.3 on some places,
but this does not m
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:16 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 16 January 2012 15:02, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> Actually Simone has already brought up a bootstrap'ped variant of the
>> Commons homepage I liked very much. Not sure what was the problem with
>> that.
>
> T
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Benedikt Ritter
wrote:
> Am 16.01.2012 16:16, schrieb sebb:
>
>> On 16 January 2012 15:02, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>>
>>> Actually Simone has already brought up a bootstrap'ped variant of the
>>> Commons homep
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Benedikt Ritter
wrote:
> Am 16.01.2012 16:40, schrieb Christian Grobmeier:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Benedikt Ritter
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 16.01.2012 16:16, schrieb sebb:
>>>
>>>>
big +1
If time allows I might be able to code a few lines myself
Cheers
Christian
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> I am here to discuss a possible area to explore for a potential
> BeanUtils2 component: I recently came across an article[1] that shows
> a fl
Thanks for all the work Lukasz, I appreciate it!!
2012/1/19 Łukasz Lenart :
> 2012/1/18 Jochen Wiedmann :
>> As I do see that ticket, it is currently properly assigned to and
>> waiting for Tony Stevenson.
>
> We must wait for INFRA now
>
>
> Regards
> --
> Łukasz
>
> -
Hello Thomas,
and welcome to Commons! Here are tons of components waiting for your
help, glad you are on board.
Cheers
Christian
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Thomas Neidhart
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> some of you may already recognize my name, as I have contributed some
> code to math in the past mo
Benedikt,
not sure if got you right. But isn't this basically what JUnit provides with:
@Test(expected = NullPointerException.class)
Cheers
Christian
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Benedikt Ritter
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while I was working on the unit tests, I had to write several try catch
> block
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Benedikt Ritter
wrote:
> Am 22.01.2012 18:18, schrieb Christian Grobmeier:
>> @Test(expected = NullPointerException.class)
>
> No it isn't. As far as I know, your test will pass, when the first
> NullPointerException is thrown (thi
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Benedikt Ritter
wrote:
>> But i found only discussions about duration& joda-time dated 2004.
>>
>> (http://markmail.org/thread/733yqv5zwzsngj3j)
>> Now i really need in Duration functionality (especially such as
>> Duration.parse(String)).
>>
> I heard about joda-
Last mail for today :-)
Today there is a discussion on going, Tapestry vs Struts (on
tapestry-users list). Of course people are convinced of Tapestry, and
actually it is a great framework with huge benefits. And it is pretty
modern. People now say (and not only there) Struts is a dinosaur.
Well,
odi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>> Last mail for today :-)
>>
>> Today there is a discussion on going, Tapestry vs Struts (on
>&g
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara
wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I was trying to integrate Struts2 with the new api layout.
> Unfortunately I realized that due to the introduction of the new checked
> CacheException [1] (which basically inherits the Exception class), every
> method (which us
Sorry to ask a bit naive, but does cl2.0 make sense with log4j 2.0 in
mind? It seems log4j 2.0 does have such an abstraction and there is
slf4j too. Probably it is time to go dormant instead?
Anyway, if there are some reasons to continue working I would welcome
Torstens approach of course! Not tha
Hi Felix and Leandro,
helping hands are very much welcome!
Cheers + good luck!
Christian
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:00 PM, wrote:
> Hi There Felix !
>
> Welcome to the dev zone ! . I am rather new here myself.
>
> Looking forward to your contributions too !
>
> Bye !
>
> Leandro.
>
> On miércol
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2012, at 6:55 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>
>>> Unlike Commons, you have to be granted permission to commit at other
>>> projects at the ASF and each of them have their own PMC and build their own
>>> communities. Commons is a sing
with more releases on up-to-date technologies
and I gladly will commit code the maven way.
Cheers
Christian
>
> -Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
&g
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:19 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 25 February 2012 14:05, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > Because we are using (still) some Java 6 code for this recent
>> contribution.
>>
>> > Ready, set, ... go?
>>
>> -1
>>
>> Completely unnece
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:53 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 27 February 2012 21:16, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> Hello All:
>>
>> This VOTE is to update the platform requirement for Commons Lang trunk to
>> Java 6 from Java 5.
>>
>> The reasons are:
>>
>> - Stop wasting time back porting code contributions from
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:37 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 27 February 2012 23:08, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:53 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 27 February 2012 21:16, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>>> Hello All:
>>>>
>>>> This VOTE
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Gilles Sadowski
wrote:
> I'm now trying to figure how to "stage the site". [What does "stage" mean in
> this context?]
"deploying" it to a place which is not the live site
>
> stagingSite
> repouser
>
>
> ---CUT---
>
> I wonder:
> * Should I replace "repous
Gary,
sounds like that one:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-619
Quote:"There is a breadcrumb without an href in your site.xml, please
check if this fixes it. Note that all elements in site.xml
require a href."
Cheers
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Hi All:
>
> I
Hello Commons-Fellowers,
this is meant for us
Cheers,
Christian
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Nadia Sokolova
wrote:
> Dear Apache Software Foundation,
>
> I am contacting you in regards to the DomainValidator code in Java that you
> have listed at:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/pr
+1
Unfortunately I cannot offer help, I am totally out of time
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general
> interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons
> proper.
>
> There are a few poin
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:30 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 12 March 2012 16:25, James Carman wrote:
>> We could say we support short-term storage (or transmission-only) only when
>> it comes to serialization. That would help eliminate some of the burden
>
> Perhaps, but why take on any burden without a go
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 12/03/2012 17:28, James Carman a écrit :
>
>> Would one of the parser libraries not work here?
>
>
> You think at something like JavaCC or AntLR? Not sure it'll be more
> efficient than a handcrafted parser. The CSV format is simple enoug
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:48 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 12 March 2012 08:45, wrote:
>> Author: ebourg
>> Date: Mon Mar 12 08:45:34 2012
>> New Revision: 1299580
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1299580&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Serialization test for CSVFormat
>
> Note: this does not test seriali
+1 on the mentioned plugins, except:
-1 on checkstyle.
I dont see a benefit in making checkstyle default. If somebody wants
to use that tool, he can.
What checkstyle-style would be the default? Sun conventions or maven
style? I am for sun, Simone is for maven (i guess). Probably there is
another
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Gilles Sadowski
wrote:
> Hi.
>
>> > [...]
>> >
>> > The tools are there, but you have to tell people that they _must_ use them.
>>
>> Commons has already enough rules and process. As long as the releases
>> are have clean code I wouldn't be too anal about the commi
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Gilles Sadowski
wrote:
>> And thats what I meant with: as long as we don't have a common
>> codestyle, i does not make much sense to have a common checkstyle
>> configuration.
>
> I thought that the question was whether to generate a CheckStyle report, not
> whethe
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:33 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>> I don't think we should be trying to recode JDK classes.
>
> If the implementations suck, why not?
+1
--
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de
-
To unsubscri
In langs StringEscapeUtils are some static methods marked with
final... it makes no sense to me to do that. I would like to remove
the final keywords. Any objections? not sure if this breaks bc (cannot
imagine)
Cheers
--
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de
---
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> wrong code style anyway :P
Wow, I have waited for this a long time...!
Welcome to the good side of bracket-life ;-)
> congrats!
> -Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> That's what the wiki is for no?
>
> You could make a page for [math] like
> http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus
Not to forget the grandfather of release guides:
http://commons.apache.org/releases/release.html
Cheers
>
> Gary
>
> On Su
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Gilles Sadowski
wrote:
>> Not to forget the grandfather of release guides:
>> http://commons.apache.org/releases/release.html
>
> I've just had a brief look at that one; I did not know it existed...
not very well linked imho... if it is linked
> Is it maintained
> 2012/1/19 Christian Grobmeier :
>> Thanks for all the work Lukasz, I appreciate it!!
>>
>> 2012/1/19 Łukasz Lenart :
>>> 2012/1/18 Jochen Wiedmann :
>>>> As I do see that ticket, it is currently properly assigned to and
>>>> waiting for Tony
2012/3/22 Łukasz Lenart :
> 2012/3/21 Christian Grobmeier :
> I don't know, maybe this is against ASF law or so ...
oh... good question. But maybe copy/paste can be seen as some kind of
"manual export" plugin? :-)
> and it'll take
> some time to manually c
+1 on the move to java 6
we should consider to go to 3.0... its a breaking change... but i
leave it up to you
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
>
>> Will the resulting jars still run on jdk 1.5?
>> I think I would sug
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:53 AM, sebb wrot
> However, a compatibility break would require a major version bump.
if my lib does drop support for a specific jdk, isn't that a
compatibility break? My argument is it is no longer compatible with
jdk5.
However, please do not consider my concerns a
+1
Before ages when I wrote the "ChangeSet" stuff I have marked them as
"experimental". Have not heard any complains yet... we should discuss
if we remove that label or if need some more tweaks there. Probably
after 1.4?
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 6:48 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Compre
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2012-03-31, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
>> Before ages when I wrote the "ChangeSet" stuff I have marked them as
>> "experimental". Have not heard any complains yet... we should discuss
>>
I read the thread and thought BeanShell would fit to Commons... I
think there are only a few committers.
OGNL is in the same vein too. I would oppose if the BS developers are
not willing to continue the project here. This is not very likely the
case here
Cheers,
Christian
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6
Its still in development.
I have asked to switch to git with log4php before a few weeks and the
answer was it is possible, if one of us gets involved in the
git@apache project. I assume it is the the here. Its definitely not GA
at the moment.
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrot
1 - 100 of 555 matches
Mail list logo
