That makes sense. Thank you for the explanation.
-Adrian
--- On Sun, 3/14/10, sebb wrote:
> From: sebb
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r922773 - /commons/sandbox/convert/trunk/.classpath
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Date: Sunday, March 14, 2010, 8:33 AM
> On 14/03/2
s sharing it, and there have been no objections to
> it being there. So, I'm puzzled by your reply.
See above.
> -Adrian
>
> --- On Sun, 3/14/10, sebb wrote:
>
> > From: sebb
> > Subject: Re: svn commit: r922773 -
> /commons/sandbox/convert/trunk/.classpath
>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r922773 - /commons/sandbox/convert/trunk/.classpath
> To: dev@commons.apache.org
> Date: Sunday, March 14, 2010, 5:03 AM
> On 14/03/2010, adri...@apache.org
>
> wrote:
> > Author: adrianc
> > Date: Sun Mar 14 06:33:58 2010
> > New Revision:
On 14/03/2010, adri...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: adrianc
> Date: Sun Mar 14 06:33:58 2010
> New Revision: 922773
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=922773&view=rev
> Log:
> Updated classpath file.
Eclipse classpath (and project) files should not be stored in SVN, as
they are not por
