On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:04 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 19 February 2014 01:28, Matt Benson wrote:
> > That wasn't supposed to be a Maven property, but a local property. The
> use
> > of the task above establishes a scoped property that will shadow
> > any preexisting value of the property "parent",
On 19 February 2014 01:28, Matt Benson wrote:
> That wasn't supposed to be a Maven property, but a local property. The use
> of the task above establishes a scoped property that will shadow
> any preexisting value of the property "parent", but I can choose a
> different name to avoid this confusi
That wasn't supposed to be a Maven property, but a local property. The use
of the task above establishes a scoped property that will shadow
any preexisting value of the property "parent", but I can choose a
different name to avoid this confusion. Thanks for getting involved.
Matt
On Tue, Feb 18
