Le 18/10/2013 17:26, Thomas Vandahl a écrit :
> This was actually a recommendation of the m2eclipse plugin. I thought it was
> a good idea.
> I'roll it back.
And IntelliJ recommends the same thing too.
Emmanuel Bourg
-
To uns
On 18 October 2013 16:26, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
>
>> Am 18.10.2013 um 16:51 schrieb sebb :
>>
>>> On 18 October 2013 14:02, wrote:
>>> Author: tv
>>> Date: Fri Oct 18 13:02:03 2013
>>> New Revision: 1533435
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1533435
>>> Log:
>>> Derive groupId from parent
>>
>>
> Am 18.10.2013 um 16:51 schrieb sebb :
>
>> On 18 October 2013 14:02, wrote:
>> Author: tv
>> Date: Fri Oct 18 13:02:03 2013
>> New Revision: 1533435
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1533435
>> Log:
>> Derive groupId from parent
>
> -1
>
> Sorry, but I don't think this is wise.
> The group
On 18 October 2013 16:05, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 18/10/2013 16:51, sebb a écrit :
>
>> -1
>>
>> Sorry, but I don't think this is wise.
>> The groupId is a critical aspect of each component; it's vital that
>> this is explicit.
>
> Well, it's explicitly defined in the declaration just above,
>
Le 18/10/2013 16:51, sebb a écrit :
> -1
>
> Sorry, but I don't think this is wise.
> The groupId is a critical aspect of each component; it's vital that
> this is explicit.
Well, it's explicitly defined in the declaration just above,
isn't it?
Emmanuel Bourg
---
On 18 October 2013 14:02, wrote:
> Author: tv
> Date: Fri Oct 18 13:02:03 2013
> New Revision: 1533435
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1533435
> Log:
> Derive groupId from parent
-1
Sorry, but I don't think this is wise.
The groupId is a critical aspect of each component; it's vital that
this i
