On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:05 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 15 October 2013 19:22, Matt Benson wrote
>
> > Should we also have (interested)? E.g., I am *interested* in
> > VFS, particularly VFS3, but I have never committed any code to that
> > component as yet. Do we care to capture that in any way for
On 15 October 2013 19:22, Matt Benson wrote:
> I like the idea of a [partial] convention, though let's formalize it up top
> and use consistently throughout. Can we define what "partial" means:
> "commits occasionally with a reduced depth of knowledge of the component's
> codebase"?
Daemon has
I like the idea of a [partial] convention, though let's formalize it up top
and use consistently throughout. Can we define what "partial" means:
"commits occasionally with a reduced depth of knowledge of the component's
codebase"? Should we also have (interested)? E.g., I am *interested* in
VFS
