On 3/11/11 7:09 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2011-03-10 23:24, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 2:01 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 10 March 2011 13:46, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
On 2011-03-10 00:36, sebb wrote:
> On 9 March 2011 12:01, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar
On 2011-03-10 23:24, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 2:01 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 10 March 2011 13:46, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>> On 2011-03-10 00:36, sebb wrote:
On 9 March 2011 12:01, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 9 Mar
On 10 March 2011 22:24, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 2:01 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 10 March 2011 13:46, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>> On 2011-03-10 00:36, sebb wrote:
On 9 March 2011 12:01, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 9
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 2:01 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 10 March 2011 13:46, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>> On 2011-03-10 00:36, sebb wrote:
>>> On 9 March 2011 12:01, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 March 2011 10:30, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On We
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2011-03-10 00:36, sebb wrote:
>> On 9 March 2011 12:01, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, sebb wrote:
On 9 March 2011 10:30, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Gary Gregory
>>
On 10 March 2011 14:12, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2011-03-10 15:01, sebb wrote:
>> On 10 March 2011 13:46, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>> On 2011-03-10 00:36, sebb wrote:
On 9 March 2011 12:01, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 9 March 2011 1
I am getting no action so far on:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3498 "Enable Nexus Access For
Commons Codec"
Can people interested in [codec] vote for it please?
Thank you,
Gary
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2011-03-10 15:01, sebb wrote:
> > On 10
On 2011-03-10 15:01, sebb wrote:
> On 10 March 2011 13:46, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>> On 2011-03-10 00:36, sebb wrote:
>>> On 9 March 2011 12:01, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 March 2011 10:30, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 201
On 10 March 2011 13:46, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2011-03-10 00:36, sebb wrote:
>> On 9 March 2011 12:01, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, sebb wrote:
On 9 March 2011 10:30, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Gary Gregory
> wrote
On Mar 10, 2011, at 8:47, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2011-03-10 00:36, sebb wrote:
>> On 9 March 2011 12:01, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, sebb wrote:
On 9 March 2011 10:30, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Gary Gregory
> wr
On 2011-03-10 00:36, sebb wrote:
> On 9 March 2011 12:01, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 9 March 2011 10:30, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:34 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
On 9 March 2011 12:01, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 9 March 2011 10:30, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:34 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 March 2011 02:31, Gary Gregory
On Mar 9, 2011, at 16:04, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
> wrote:
>> Please, let's forget about the relocation nonsense. Noone ever said
>> it'd be working as expected (for example. sebb has tried heavily to
>> get that confirmed on maven-dev) and it wil
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> Please, let's forget about the relocation nonsense. Noone ever said
> it'd be working as expected (for example. sebb has tried heavily to
> get that confirmed on maven-dev) and it will only break things for
> other users without real gain. A
Yep, fine with me, waiting on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3498
Gary
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> Please, let's forget about the relocation nonsense. Noone ever said
> it'd be working as expected (for example. sebb has tried heavily to
> get that confir
Please, let's forget about the relocation nonsense. Noone ever said
it'd be working as expected (for example. sebb has tried heavily to
get that confirmed on maven-dev) and it will only break things for
other users without real gain. After all, what's so terrible if the
group ID isn't what we'd lik
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> It only means that you might have to create a Jira issue which
> requests Nexus permissions for the groupId commons-codec. Quite
> possible that this already exists. For example, I can say for sure
> that such permissions exist for commons-f
On 9 March 2011 10:30, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:34 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>>> On 9 March 2011 02:31, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> > Does having the old style of groupId mean that deploying will not work,
>>> per
>>> > http:/
It only means that you might have to create a Jira issue which
requests Nexus permissions for the groupId commons-codec. Quite
possible that this already exists. For example, I can say for sure
that such permissions exist for commons-fileupload. Just try to deploy
to Nexus and if you get suspicious
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:34 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 9 March 2011 02:31, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > Does having the old style of groupId mean that deploying will not work,
>> per
>> > http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus#top
>> >
>> > "All
Hi Sebb,
sebb wrote:
> On 9 March 2011 02:46, Gary Gregory wrote:
[snip]
>> Ug, I cannot change the groupId because I cannot change the package.
>> Codec 1.5 fixes some long standing bugs introduced in 1.4.
>>
>> If I change the groupId... Are we talking end of the Maven world or
>> wasted mem
Thank you, I understand now. I will go the Nexus route first...
Gary
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:55 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 March 2011 02:46, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:34 PM, sebb wrote:
> >>
> >> On 9 March 2011 02:31, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >> > Does having the o
On 9 March 2011 02:46, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:34 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 9 March 2011 02:31, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > Does having the old style of groupId mean that deploying will not work,
>> > per
>> > http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus#top
>> >
>> > "All Co
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:34 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 March 2011 02:31, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Does having the old style of groupId mean that deploying will not work,
> per
> > http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus#top
> >
> > "All Commons components that use the org.apache.commons groupId are
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:34 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 March 2011 02:31, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Does having the old style of groupId mean that deploying will not work,
> per
> > http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus#top
> >
> > "All Commons components that use the org.apache.commons groupId are
On 9 March 2011 02:31, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Does having the old style of groupId mean that deploying will not work, per
> http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus#top
>
> "All Commons components that use the org.apache.commons groupId are already
> set up to use Nexus."
>
> And if not... what ha
Does having the old style of groupId mean that deploying will not work, per
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus#top
"All Commons components that use the *org.apache.commons* groupId are
already set up to use Nexus."
And if not... what happens?
Gary
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Gary Gre
Does having the old style of groupId mean that deploying will not work, per
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus#top
"All Commons components that use the *org.apache.commons* groupId are
already set up to use Nexus."
And if not... what happens?
Gary
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:00 PM, sebb w
Reverting and will do for 2.0.
Gary
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:00 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 March 2011 00:02, wrote:
> > Author: ggregory
> > Date: Wed Mar 9 00:02:12 2011
> > New Revision: 1079608
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1079608&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Use org.apache.commons
On 9 March 2011 00:02, wrote:
> Author: ggregory
> Date: Wed Mar 9 00:02:12 2011
> New Revision: 1079608
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1079608&view=rev
> Log:
> Use org.apache.commons groupId
If you change the groupId you'll probably need to change the package
name as well ..
Other
30 matches
Mail list logo
