Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Validator 1.4 beta 1 based on RC2

2011-07-10 Thread Oliver Heger
The maven build works fine with JDK 1.5 and 1.6 under Windows 7. Artifacts and site look good. The clirr report has one error: "Parameter 1 of 'protected boolean isValidIpAddress(org.apache.oro.text.perl.Perl5Util)' has changed its type to java.lang.String" I don't know whether this is a big

[VOTE] Release Commons Validator 1.4 beta 1 based on RC2

2011-07-08 Thread Nick Burch
Hi All Following the advice from the previous failed vote, I've rolled another RC for Commons Validator 1.4 beta 1. As per advice, this one was generated using Maven[1] rather than Ant. Just for a reminder, the idea of this release is to get some wider testing of the codebase, owing to the 4.5

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Validator 1.4 beta 1 based on RC1

2011-06-02 Thread sebb
On 2 June 2011 22:32, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Nick Burch wrote: >> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Niall Pemberton wrote: >>> >>> If you use the Maven2 build then it should all build as expected. >> >> So it seems. I think I'll remove the release target from the ant build (s

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Validator 1.4 beta 1 based on RC1

2011-06-02 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Nick Burch wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Niall Pemberton wrote: >> >> If you use the Maven2 build then it should all build as expected. > > So it seems. I think I'll remove the release target from the ant build (so > no-one else tries it and gets bitten), then see i

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Validator 1.4 beta 1 based on RC1

2011-06-02 Thread Phil Steitz
On 6/2/11 2:24 PM, Nick Burch wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Niall Pemberton wrote: >> If you use the Maven2 build then it should all build as expected. > > So it seems. I think I'll remove the release target from the ant > build (so no-one else tries it and gets bitten), then see if I can > figure o

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Validator 1.4 beta 1 based on RC1

2011-06-02 Thread Nick Burch
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Niall Pemberton wrote: If you use the Maven2 build then it should all build as expected. So it seems. I think I'll remove the release target from the ant build (so no-one else tries it and gets bitten), then see if I can figure out how to use the maven release plugin! Ni

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Validator 1.4 beta 1 based on RC1

2011-06-02 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Nick Burch wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Oliver Heger wrote: >> >> About the distribution files: Shouldn't the naming be >> commons-validator-1.4.0-beta1 rather than validator-1.4.0-beta1? Also the >> manifest of the jar in the binary distribution does not contain al

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Validator 1.4 beta 1 based on RC1

2011-06-02 Thread Phil Steitz
On 6/2/11 12:04 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: > Am 02.06.2011 19:36, schrieb Nick Burch: >> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Oliver Heger wrote: >>> About the distribution files: Shouldn't the naming be >>> commons-validator-1.4.0-beta1 rather than validator-1.4.0-beta1? >>> Also >>> the manifest of the jar in the bi

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Validator 1.4 beta 1 based on RC1

2011-06-02 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 02.06.2011 19:36, schrieb Nick Burch: On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Oliver Heger wrote: About the distribution files: Shouldn't the naming be commons-validator-1.4.0-beta1 rather than validator-1.4.0-beta1? Also the manifest of the jar in the binary distribution does not contain all properties typical

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Validator 1.4 beta 1 based on RC1

2011-06-02 Thread sebb
On 2 June 2011 18:24, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Nick Burch wrote: > >> Hi All >> >> Following last week's discussions, I've rolled a RC for Commons Validator >> 1.4 beta 1. The idea of this release is to get some wider testing of the >> codebase, owing to the 4.5 year gap since 1.3.1, before we hopef

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Validator 1.4 beta 1 based on RC1

2011-06-02 Thread Nick Burch
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Oliver Heger wrote: About the distribution files: Shouldn't the naming be commons-validator-1.4.0-beta1 rather than validator-1.4.0-beta1? Also the manifest of the jar in the binary distribution does not contain all properties typical for commons components. When I build the

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Validator 1.4 beta 1 based on RC1

2011-06-02 Thread Jörg Schaible
Nick Burch wrote: > Hi All > > Following last week's discussions, I've rolled a RC for Commons Validator > 1.4 beta 1. The idea of this release is to get some wider testing of the > codebase, owing to the 4.5 year gap since 1.3.1, before we hopefully > release 1.4 in a few weeks time. > > (We be

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Validator 1.4 beta 1 based on RC1

2011-06-02 Thread Oliver Heger
Hi, I don't know the code base either so will only give some technical comments related to the artifacts: Maven and ant builds work fine with Java 1.5 and 1.6 on Windows 7. About the distribution files: Shouldn't the naming be commons-validator-1.4.0-beta1 rather than validator-1.4.0-beta1?

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Validator 1.4 beta 1 based on RC1

2011-06-01 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi Nick, I do not know enough about this code base to vote on it, but I noticed the following building with Maven: [warn] [XHTML Sink] Modified invalid anchor name: 'Changes Report' to 'Changes_Report' [warn] [XHTML Sink] Modified invalid anchor name: 'Release History' to 'Release_History' [INFO

[VOTE] Release Commons Validator 1.4 beta 1 based on RC1

2011-05-31 Thread Nick Burch
Hi All Following last week's discussions, I've rolled a RC for Commons Validator 1.4 beta 1. The idea of this release is to get some wider testing of the codebase, owing to the 4.5 year gap since 1.3.1, before we hopefully release 1.4 in a few weeks time. (We believe the code is stable and r

RE: [validator] release commons validator 1.4

2011-02-24 Thread Jacob Zwiers
fixed bugs) with a relative priority of the outstanding issues? jz -Original Message- From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 8:28 PM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: release commons validator 1.4 On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 9:58 PM,

Re: release commons validator 1.4

2011-02-22 Thread Niall Pemberton
e >>> validator is currently in and come up with a TODO list for a 1.4 >>> release. >>> >>> Niall >>> >>> > jz >>> > >>> > >>> > -Original Message- >>> > From: David Karlsen [mailto:davidkarl...@gmai

Re: release commons validator 1.4

2011-02-21 Thread David Karlsen
emember the state >> validator is currently in and come up with a TODO list for a 1.4 >> release. >> >> Niall >> >> > jz >> > >> > >> > -Original Message- >> > From: David Karlsen [mailto:davidkarl...@gmail.com] >>

Re: release commons validator 1.4

2011-01-27 Thread David Karlsen
; jz > > > > > > -Original Message----- > > From: David Karlsen [mailto:davidkarl...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 9:59 AM > > To: dev@commons.apache.org > > Subject: release commons validator 1.4 > > > > Hi. > >

Re: release commons validator 1.4

2011-01-19 Thread Niall Pemberton
27;t know. I need to review/remember the state validator is currently in and come up with a TODO list for a 1.4 release. Niall > jz > > > -Original Message- > From: David Karlsen [mailto:davidkarl...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 9:59 AM > To: dev@co

RE: release commons validator 1.4

2011-01-19 Thread Jacob Zwiers
ere an interest among committers to push a 1.4 release? If so, where do you see volunteer help being most useful? jz -Original Message- From: David Karlsen [mailto:davidkarl...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 9:59 AM To: dev@commons.apache.org Subject: release commons va

release commons validator 1.4

2011-01-19 Thread David Karlsen
Hi. We'd be very interested in http://commons.apache.org/validator/apidocs/org/apache/commons/validator/routines/checkdigit/LuhnCheckDigit.html- could 1.4 be released? It's been quite a while since the last 1.3.1 relase -- -- David J. M. Karlsen - http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidkarlsen