Re: component suggest : commons-monitoring

2008-01-16 Thread nicolas de loof
I've found the example proposal in the sandbox/project-template. I'll publish one soon. 2008/1/16, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 1/16/08, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm ok with the graduate rule. > > > > Could you please grant me access to the sandbox SVN ? > > > >

Re: component suggest : commons-monitoring

2008-01-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 1/16/08, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm ok with the graduate rule. > > Could you please grant me access to the sandbox SVN ? > > Is there some rule to follow for documentation, to best fit with other > commons ? > In addition to what Hen said, IMO its good to have a slightly

Re: component suggest : commons-monitoring

2008-01-16 Thread nicolas de loof
> > > Could you please grant me access to the sandbox SVN ? > > Done. Thanks > > Is there some rule to follow for documentation, to best fit with other > > commons ? > > You'll know when you break them ;) > > Generally (new) components are using m2 for the build system and JDK > 1.5 dependent

Re: component suggest : commons-monitoring

2008-01-16 Thread Henri Yandell
On Jan 16, 2008 12:13 AM, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm ok with the graduate rule. > > Could you please grant me access to the sandbox SVN ? Done. > Is there some rule to follow for documentation, to best fit with other > commons ? You'll know when you break them ;) Generally

Re: component suggest : commons-monitoring

2008-01-16 Thread nicolas de loof
I'm ok with the graduate rule. Could you please grant me access to the sandbox SVN ? Is there some rule to follow for documentation, to best fit with other commons ? Nico. 2008/1/15, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 1/15/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 15, 200

Re: component suggest : commons-monitoring

2008-01-15 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 1/15/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 15, 2008 4:28 PM, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I just asked for an apache lab for a java monitoring component > > ( > > http://labs.markmail.org/search/list:org.apache.labs.labs#query:list%3Aorg.apache.

Re: component suggest : commons-monitoring

2008-01-15 Thread nicolas de loof
The current jmonit code base is more an experiment, or a "proof of concept", than a stable codebase ready for incubation. My intention is to start a new component from scratch, taking benefict from this first attempt. That is the reason why I do not take incubator as first option. Nico. We have

Re: component suggest : commons-monitoring

2008-01-15 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Jan 15, 2008 4:28 PM, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I just asked for an apache lab for a java monitoring component > ( > http://labs.markmail.org/search/list:org.apache.labs.labs#query:list%3Aorg.apache.labs.labs+page:1+mid:bkztzg2rmceuopvq+state:results > ) > > One yea

component suggest : commons-monitoring

2008-01-15 Thread nicolas de loof
Hello, I just asked for an apache lab for a java monitoring component ( http://labs.markmail.org/search/list:org.apache.labs.labs#query:list%3Aorg.apache.labs.labs+page:1+mid:bkztzg2rmceuopvq+state:results ) One year ago I've created a sourceforge project (www.jmonit.org) with same idea in mind,