On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Dec 21, 2010, at 4:11 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Ralph Goers >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> I would say that is up to the RM :)
>
> Did you add the above comment? It wasn't in my original email.
>
> Yes. De
On Dec 21, 2010, at 5:10 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Dec 21, 2010, at 4:11 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Ralph Goers
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I would say that is up to the RM :)
>
> Did you add the above comment? It wasn't in my original email.
>
>>
>> I
On Dec 21, 2010, at 4:11 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Ralph Goers
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I would say that is up to the RM :)
Did you add the above comment? It wasn't in my original email.
>
> I personally don't have a problem with the out-of-synch condition. What
