On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> Mark Struberg wrote:
>>
>>> folks, please keep on voting.
>>> There are a few projects eager to use beta.3 or however it's gonna be
>>> named as long it's not a SNAPSHOT :)
>>
>> Well, this is exactly the
Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Mark Struberg wrote:
>
>> folks, please keep on voting.
>> There are a few projects eager to use beta.3 or however it's gonna be
>> named as long it's not a SNAPSHOT :)
>
> Well, this is exactly the point what we want to avoid. The beta release is
> there for
Hi Mark,
Mark Struberg wrote:
> folks, please keep on voting.
> There are a few projects eager to use beta.3 or however it's gonna be
> named as long it's not a SNAPSHOT :)
Well, this is exactly the point what we want to avoid. The beta release is
there for giving users an impression about the
c: Commons Developers List
>> Sent: Thu, July 29, 2010 1:14:50 PM
>> Subject: Re: Upgrading commons-lang
>>
>> maybe we can ask Henri and Sebb to push a commons-lang-3.0-pre-1 release?
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>> - Original M
s List
> Sent: Thu, July 29, 2010 1:14:50 PM
> Subject: Re: Upgrading commons-lang
>
> maybe we can ask Henri and Sebb to push a commons-lang-3.0-pre-1 release?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> > From: David Jencks
> > To
maybe we can ask Henri and Sebb to push a commons-lang-3.0-pre-1 release?
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message
> From: David Jencks
> To: bval-...@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, July 28, 2010 11:35:01 PM
> Subject: Re: Upgrading commons-lang
>
> I have no p
