On 5/19/11 2:21 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 19 May 2011 06:34, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 5/18/11 9:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>> The following rule seems unnecessary to me:
>>>
>>> http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsEtiquette#Commons_Etiquette
>>>
>>> "each committer who commits to a component must
On 5/19/11 6:29 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>
>> On 05/19/11 06:34, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 5/18/11 9:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
The following rule seems unnecessary to me:
> +1
>
> It should not be a rule.
>
> Does anyone know M
sebb wrote:
> On 20 May 2011 00:48, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> sebb wrote:
>>
>>> On 19 May 2011 06:34, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 5/18/11 9:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> The following rule seems unnecessary to me:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsEtiquette#Commons_Etiquette
>>
On 20 May 2011 00:48, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
>> On 19 May 2011 06:34, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 5/18/11 9:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
The following rule seems unnecessary to me:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsEtiquette#Commons_Etiquette
"each committe
sebb wrote:
> On 19 May 2011 06:34, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 5/18/11 9:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>> The following rule seems unnecessary to me:
>>>
>>> http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsEtiquette#Commons_Etiquette
>>>
>>> "each committer who commits to a component must add their name to th
On 19 May 2011 06:34, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 5/18/11 9:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> The following rule seems unnecessary to me:
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsEtiquette#Commons_Etiquette
>>
>> "each committer who commits to a component must add their name to the
>> STATUS file" (
+1 to changelog-plugin, it would be nice having the svn activity published :)
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2011/5/19 Gary Gregory :
>> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
>> wrote:
2011/5/19 Gary Gregory :
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>
>> On 05/19/11 06:34, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> > On 5/18/11 9:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> >> The following rule seems unnecessary to me:
>>
>
> +1
>
> It should not be a rule.
>
> Does anyone know Maven eno
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On 05/19/11 06:34, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > On 5/18/11 9:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> >> The following rule seems unnecessary to me:
>
+1
It should not be a rule.
Does anyone know Maven enough to write a "svn-report" like there is a
On 05/19/11 06:34, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 5/18/11 9:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> The following rule seems unnecessary to me:
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsEtiquette#Commons_Etiquette
>>
>> "each committer who commits to a component must add their name to the
>> STATUS file" (or p
On 5/18/11 9:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> The following rule seems unnecessary to me:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsEtiquette#Commons_Etiquette
>
> "each committer who commits to a component must add their name to the
> STATUS file" (or pom.xml)
>
> I've never done this, have touched
I think its unnecessary.
If you want to find out who did something, use svn. If a user needs to
get a responsible person - we all are somehow. The right person will
come out from the mailinglist.
Adding yourself is ok if you have done some portions, feel well with
the code and responsible for the
The following rule seems unnecessary to me:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsEtiquette#Commons_Etiquette
"each committer who commits to a component must add their name to the
STATUS file" (or pom.xml)
I've never done this, have touched every component (give or take a
component or two) and
13 matches
Mail list logo
