Re: Testing enhanced @Deprecation vs. jdk 8

2017-06-09 Thread Simon Spero
Does Animal Sniffer check this? It wasn't clear from eyeballing the code if it paid much attention to annotations apart from its own, but it all depends on a possible twisty maze of delegation in as, so I'm uncertain. On Jun 9, 2017 11:55 AM, "Gary Gregory" wrote: > That would require that the

Re: Testing enhanced @Deprecation vs. jdk 8

2017-06-09 Thread Gary Gregory
That would require that the animal sniffer plugin be setup for components that do want to go that way. Doable if there is a sig file for the right Java version for that component. Gary On Jun 9, 2017 8:13 AM, "Simon Spero" wrote: > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Gary Gregory > wrote: > > > >

Testing enhanced @Deprecation vs. jdk 8

2017-06-09 Thread Simon Spero
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > 3. JDK9 adds some extra parameters to the Deprecated annotation (most > notably forRemoval=true, which is used to indicate that the annotated item > is really really deprecated.) It's not needed in this case, but is > worth thinking abo