Re: Sandbox politeness

2009-12-05 Thread Benson Margulies
I've ordered a copy of Knuth since i can't find mine and i need to refresh some very stale neurons on the subject of hashing. On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:18 AM, James Carman wrote: > Yeah I'd say just get some code in there for now.  We can clean it up later > when it goes into proper after all you

Re: Sandbox politeness

2009-12-05 Thread James Carman
Yeah I'd say just get some code in there for now. We can clean it up later when it goes into proper after all your hard work! On Dec 5, 2009 9:55 AM, "Benson Margulies" wrote: Yes. I need to get educated on the existing primitives parent structure and conventions. However, now that I've unders

Re: Sandbox politeness

2009-12-05 Thread Benson Margulies
Yes. I need to get educated on the existing primitives parent structure and conventions. However, now that I've understood what is and isn't in the current primitives, I'm leaving the structure alone and concentrating on implementing the big missing chunk, and if I succeed at that I'll return to h

Re: Sandbox politeness

2009-12-04 Thread James Carman
So, you're saying you're going to have a "core" module and a benchmark module? Both of them under a pom-style project called primitives-parent or something like that? On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > I'm inclined to push the current content of primitives down a > directo

Re: Sandbox politeness

2009-12-04 Thread Phil Steitz
Benson Margulies wrote: > I'm inclined to push the current content of primitives down a > directory to make a space to put a benchmark module. Is that > objectionable? > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache

Sandbox politeness

2009-12-04 Thread Benson Margulies
I'm inclined to push the current content of primitives down a directory to make a space to put a benchmark module. Is that objectionable? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail