On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 12:57 +0200, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On 8/6/07, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > We are most likely to spin off the support for multipart coded POSTs
> > into a separate module (artifact) as of release 4.0, so dependency on
> > Mime4J will remain optional.
On 8/6/07, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are most likely to spin off the support for multipart coded POSTs
> into a separate module (artifact) as of release 4.0, so dependency on
> Mime4J will remain optional. I do not think Axis2 presently makes any
> use of multipart coded PO
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 21:25 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Hmm, if we are doing this (mime4j in httpclient), please let us know
> so that we will look more seriously at getting rid of mailapi jar in
> axis2 and depend on mime4j as well. since we dependent heavily on
> httpclient.
>
> thanks,
> d
Hmm, if we are doing this (mime4j in httpclient), please let us know
so that we will look more seriously at getting rid of mailapi jar in
axis2 and depend on mime4j as well. since we dependent heavily on
httpclient.
thanks,
dims
On 8/5/07, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jochen Wie
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to ask for feedback on a proposed version of
commons-fileupload. It isn't yet finished, but most of the test cases
are already working.
Hi Jochen
It is unlikely I will manage to find time to review the code, but I
would like to say that I consider the
Hi,
I'd like to ask for feedback on a proposed version of
commons-fileupload. It isn't yet finished, but most of the test cases
are already working.
Changes:
- Based on a slightly patched version of Mime4J. Should be possible to get the
required changes into upstream. The most important part w
