On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:37 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 5 April 2011 09:32, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>
>>> [Side note; this is insane:
>>> http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-encryption.html - I vomit
>>> every time it's implied I should put
On 5 April 2011 09:32, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> [Side note; this is insane:
>> http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-encryption.html - I vomit
>> every time it's implied I should put passwords in the Maven settings
>> file]
>
> Totall
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Very late, but I've been a tad busy in the new-parent department.
You didn't publish a POM yet, did you? ;-)
> What I do care about is releasing often. Which is farcical given how
> few times I've released. I want to release every month.
Very late, but I've been a tad busy in the new-parent department.
Generally I agree with Phil's email. I don't really care though - I
recognize that my main pain with Nexus is a) the experience to know
not to trust magical systems & b) not being full of energy to follow
yet another build system ch
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 5:46 PM, sebb wrote:
> If they are left in Nexus staging, AFAIK they end up in Maven Central
> when promoted.
And your point is?
--
I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye)
-
To unsubscribe,
On Mar 31, 2011, at 8:49 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 31 March 2011 12:08, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>
>>> And then you need to check the hashes and sigs again since you are
>>> now working with downloaded copies of the files that we voted on.
>>> S
On 31 March 2011 12:08, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> And then you need to check the hashes and sigs again since you are
>> now working with downloaded copies of the files that we voted on.
>> Seems much easier and more correct to me to just scp
On 31 March 2011 12:05, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 1:36 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> AFAIK, wget alone won't do, as the files also have to be deleted.
>
> Why? There's no problem with leaving them where they are.
If they are left in Nexus staging, AFAIK they end up in Maven Central
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> And then you need to check the hashes and sigs again since you are
> now working with downloaded copies of the files that we voted on.
> Seems much easier and more correct to me to just scp the files to
> p.a.o., let people vote on them and *m
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 1:36 AM, sebb wrote:
> AFAIK, wget alone won't do, as the files also have to be deleted.
Why? There's no problem with leaving them where they are.
> Also, it would be best if that part of the process could be done from
> the users system, rather than having to login to
On 31 March 2011 04:00, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 3/30/11 6:57 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 31 March 2011 01:38, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 3/30/11 4:22 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I disagree with this. The most important artifacts are th
On 3/30/11 7:07 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> I'm seeing a lot of complaining on these threads but no actual proposal.
I started the thread with a proposal, which was to standardize on
the process documented on the web site. I know you don't like that
process and I am not going to insist that we force
On 3/30/11 6:57 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 31 March 2011 01:38, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 3/30/11 4:22 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>>
I disagree with this. The most important artifacts are the
zips/tars that go to dist/. These *are* the
I'm seeing a lot of complaining on these threads but no actual proposal. If the
proposal is to move away from Maven/Nexus for a release for all of commons I'll
vote -1. OTOH, If some release managers want to do the release some other way
I'm not going to force them to use Maven/Nexus.
Ralph
On 31 March 2011 01:38, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 3/30/11 4:22 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>
>>> I disagree with this. The most important artifacts are the
>>> zips/tars that go to dist/. These *are* the ASF release. Nexus
>>> makes it *hard
On 3/30/11 4:22 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> I disagree with this. The most important artifacts are the
>> zips/tars that go to dist/. These *are* the ASF release. Nexus
>> makes it *harder* IMO to maintain provenance of these artifacts.
On 31 March 2011 00:22, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> I disagree with this. The most important artifacts are the
>> zips/tars that go to dist/. These *are* the ASF release. Nexus
>> makes it *harder* IMO to maintain provenance of these artifa
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I disagree with this. The most important artifacts are the
> zips/tars that go to dist/. These *are* the ASF release. Nexus
> makes it *harder* IMO to maintain provenance of these artifacts.
These artifacts are present in Nexus. Pulling th
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:23 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 20:56, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:08 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 29 March 2011 18:33, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:18 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 16:52, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 29 March 2011 20:56, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:08 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 29 March 2011 18:33, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:18 PM, sebb wrote:
On 29 March 2011 16:52, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 3/29/11 8:33 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 29 Ma
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:08 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 18:33, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:18 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 29 March 2011 16:52, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 3/29/11 8:33 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 16:20, Matt Benson wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar
On 29 March 2011 18:33, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:18 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 29 March 2011 16:52, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 3/29/11 8:33 AM, sebb wrote:
On 29 March 2011 16:20, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:08 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 29 March
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:18 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 16:52, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 3/29/11 8:33 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 29 March 2011 16:20, Matt Benson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:08 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 16:02, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar
On 29 March 2011 16:52, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 3/29/11 8:33 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 29 March 2011 16:20, Matt Benson wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:08 AM, sebb wrote:
On 29 March 2011 16:02, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Phil Steitz
> wrote:
On 3/29/11 8:33 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 16:20, Matt Benson wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:08 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 29 March 2011 16:02, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> After another nightmare by an RM who has not cut a rel
On 29 March 2011 16:20, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:08 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 29 March 2011 16:02, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
After another nightmare by an RM who has not cut a release in a
while, I think we need
On Mar 29, 2011, at 8:08 AM, sebb wrote:
>>
>
> Yes, that is true.
>
> Also, had the [net] release been using Nexus, it would have required 2
> additional manual stages to close and then release the Maven
> artifacts.
> It is impossible to accidentally release Maven artifacts using Maven
> com
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:08 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 16:02, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> After another nightmare by an RM who has not cut a release in a
>>> while, I think we need to do something. The documentation on the
>>> Com
On 29 March 2011 16:02, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> After another nightmare by an RM who has not cut a release in a
>> while, I think we need to do something. The documentation on the
>> Commons web pages describes a process that works. I sug
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> After another nightmare by an RM who has not cut a release in a
> while, I think we need to do something. The documentation on the
> Commons web pages describes a process that works. I suggest that we
> standardize on that process, adding so
After another nightmare by an RM who has not cut a release in a
while, I think we need to do something. The documentation on the
Commons web pages describes a process that works. I suggest that we
standardize on that process, adding some simple automation scripts
that RMs can choose to use or no
31 matches
Mail list logo
