Re: [CANCELLED] Release JEXL 3.0 based on RC1

2011-11-30 Thread sebb
On 30 November 2011 06:56, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 29/11/2011 22:28, Matt Benson a écrit : >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Henri Biestro wrote: >>> I'm obviously unfit as RM. >>> >>> I do not think so. >> >> +1.  I've only

Re: [CANCELLED] Release JEXL 3.0 based on RC1

2011-11-29 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 29/11/2011 22:28, Matt Benson a écrit : > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Henri Biestro wrote: >> >>> I'm obviously unfit as RM. >>> >> >> I do not think so. > > +1. I've only done the RM thing once, because it's such a PITA to get > t

Re: [CANCELLED] Release JEXL 3.0 based on RC1

2011-11-29 Thread Matt Benson
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Henri Biestro wrote: > >> I'm obviously unfit as RM. >> > > I do not think so. +1. I've only done the RM thing once, because it's such a PITA to get things right. This is one reason we need to release early

[CANCELLED] Release JEXL 3.0 based on RC1

2011-11-29 Thread Henri Biestro
I'm obviously unfit as RM. Sorry for the mess, feel free to remove any offending tag/branch/code. Regards. Henrib - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apa

Re: Release JEXL 3.0 based on RC1

2011-11-29 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Henri, henrib wrote: > I dont understand what is expected anymore... > > There are some new features and fixes that break the API at the binary and > source level; I'm merely applying the best practice recommendations - and > previous 2.1 rejection basis. > > This version has been 18 months

Re: Release JEXL 3.0 based on RC1

2011-11-29 Thread henrib
I dont understand what is expected anymore... There are some new features and fixes that break the API at the binary and source level; I'm merely applying the best practice recommendations - and previous 2.1 rejection basis. This version has been 18 months in the making, fixes quite a few bugs an

Re: Release JEXL 3.0 based on RC1

2011-11-29 Thread sebb
On 29 November 2011 17:00, Henri Biestro wrote: > Dear all, > > JEXL 3.0 is ready for review. > > The 2.1 attempt comments have been folded in; JEXL 3 being binary and source > code incompatible with JEXL 2, the code has moved to the new o.a.c.jexl3 > package. > I've also moved some classes to t

Release JEXL 3.0 based on RC1

2011-11-29 Thread Henri Biestro
Dear all, JEXL 3.0 is ready for review. The 2.1 attempt comments have been folded in; JEXL 3 being binary and source code incompatible with JEXL 2, the code has moved to the new o.a.c.jexl3 package. I've also moved some classes to the internal packages to make the public API clearer for the