I've checked:
* commons-beanutils-2.0.0-M2-RC1 corresponds to
5d09ef79376511519b0b4aafcb5bbe79a70bd3c7
* sha512 of the 2 source archives match
dca62e297ac5b87caaf63c6793764a8ce743e2539766dd59588ab319d5051a5adaa145aba584c38d0fa0624e481d4d0584629bf88f56785613fb87bf4b7bc4b9
and
3097dce40ff3c62db1f330
On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 3:10 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Note that the svn commit for the dev files is now 77119 due to trying
> to release two versions simultaneously.
> I checked the hashes of the files in revision 77119 and they match those
> of this vote thread.
>
> However, there is a typo in
My +1
Gary
On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 10:18 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> BeanUtils 2.0.0-M1 was released, so I would like to release Apache
> Commons BeanUtils 2.0.0-M2.
>
> Apache Commons BeanUtils 2.0.0-M2 RC1 is available for r
Note that the svn commit for the dev files is now 77119 due to trying
to release two versions simultaneously.
Gary
On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 10:18 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> BeanUtils 2.0.0-M1 was released, so I would like to r
Hi Gary,
On 25.05.2025 16:18, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Please review the release candidate and vote.
> This vote will close no sooner than 24 hours from now.
>
> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> [ ] +0 OK, but...
> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
+1 non binding Tested this in my local code and all is working well.
On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 10:19 AM Gary Gregory
wrote:
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> BeanUtils 2.0.0-M1 was released, so I would like to release Apache
> Commons BeanUtils 2.0.0-M2.
>
>
