On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 7:05 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
> I personally feel this will just clutter the PR queue for some components
> and force one to go digging for status information which is now readily
> available. The PR will eventually be "lost" in the queue.
While I agree the 'boolean' status i
Hi,
I personally feel this will just clutter the PR queue for some components
and force one to go digging for status information which is now readily
available. The PR will eventually be "lost" in the queue.
I prefer to see all builds in one place which GitHub shows nicely.
A major problem with
Le ven. 9 mai 2025 à 16:27, Arnout Engelen a écrit :
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 3:33 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
> > I think we need to build with the next EA Java version especially when the
> > next Java version is an LTS version like 25. This serves as an early
> > warning signal for work to do but
On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 3:33 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
> I think we need to build with the next EA Java version especially when the
> next Java version is an LTS version like 25. This serves as an early
> warning signal for work to do but also as playing our part in the FOSS at
> large ecosystem where
Hi all,
I think we need to build with the next EA Java version especially when the
next Java version is an LTS version like 25. This serves as an early
warning signal for work to do but also as playing out part in the FOSS at
large ecosystem where we should report failures to the 3rd party tooling
