My +1
Gary
On Sat, Jul 19, 2025, 13:41 Henri Biestro wrote:
> [+1]
>
> Build & tests ok; site & javadoc look good; reports check (nice coverage).
>
> Built using: mvn clean install site -s "$HOME/.m2/commons-settings.xml"
>
> On: mvn -version
> Apache Maven 3.8.6 (84538c9988a25aec085021c365c5
[+1]
Build & tests ok; site & javadoc look good; reports check (nice coverage).
Built using: mvn clean install site -s "$HOME/.m2/commons-settings.xml"
On: mvn -version
Apache Maven 3.8.6 (84538c9988a25aec085021c365c560670ad80f63)
Maven home: /Users/hbiestro/Java/apache-maven-3.8.6
Java version
Hi Gary,
W dniu 14.07.2025 o 23:36, Gary Gregory pisze:
Please review the release candidate and vote.
This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now.
[ ] +1 Release these artifacts
[ ] +0 OK, but...
[ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
[ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
Hello Ravishankar.
I would like us to migrate to Mina as well, the tracking ticket is
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/VFS/issues/VFS-838
I like option 3, more specifically:
Create a new Maven module commons-vfs2-ssh-jsch and move the current
code there, same package, all code is deprecat
Hi Gary and Konrad,
I am a new user of VFS (version 2.9.0) and new to open source mailing lists.
I am writing to inquire about the progress on the jsch upgrade/migration.
Do we have any plans of migrating to jsch fork or Apache Mina?
Thank you for your time and assistance.
Thanks,
Ravishankar Jos
All looks good. +1. Many thanks Gary!
> On Jul 16, 2025, at 8:00 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> My +1
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025, 17:36 Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
>> IO 2.19.0 was released, so I would like to release A
Hi.
Le mer. 16 juil. 2025 à 17:27, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>
> Hello Bence,
>
> Lang is stable, binary compatibility is maintained.
>
> One of the goals here is to stop growing the StringUtils API with endless
> variations of ignore case methods
+1
IIUC, what is a real improvement on the library
Hello Bence,
Lang is stable, binary compatibility is maintained.
One of the goals here is to stop growing the StringUtils API with endless
variations of ignore case methods which have been steadily coming in over
the years, giving us what we have today, a huge unwieldy class.
What each developer
...my 2 cents...
I wasn't excited about it either when I made all the changes to our code
base yesterday either. Especially since I was only updating the library to
pick up a security fix. (which likely didn't even affect us, but like many,
we have to keep the "numbers down", and explaining each s
My +1
Gary
On Mon, Jul 14, 2025, 17:36 Gary Gregory wrote:
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> IO 2.19.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons IO
> 2.20.0.
>
> Apache Commons IO 2.20.0 RC1 is available for review here:
> https://dist.a
[+1] Go ahead with the release.
Tomas Lanik
On Mon, Jul 14, 2025, 23:37 Gary Gregory wrote:
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> IO 2.19.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons IO
> 2.20.0.
>
> Apache Commons IO 2.20.0 RC1 is available for
Thank you for the quick response.
Gary
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025, 10:27 cpe_dictionary wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We appreciate community
> input in order to provide the most accurate and up-to-date information as
> possible. After reviewing publicly ava
Good morning,
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We appreciate community input in
order to provide the most accurate and up-to-date information as possible.
After reviewing publicly available information we have made the appropriate
modifications to remove CPE Applicability Statement
Le mar. 15 juil. 2025 à 15:33, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 9:28 AM Amess Xeno wrote:
> >
> > emm I'm not sure, do you want me help?
>
> No, but thank you, I am expecting the person who committed the broken
> file to fix the problem they caused. They must not be monitoring t
mess
> > > ____
> > > From: Gary Gregory
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2025 9:00:21 PM
> > > To: Commons Developers List
> > > Subject: Re: [GH] (commons-fileupload/master): Workflow run "Java CI"
> > > fai
Gregory
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2025 9:00:21 PM
> > To: Commons Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [GH] (commons-fileupload/master): Workflow run "Java CI"
> > failed!
> >
> > ping, the build is failing
> >
> > Gary
> >
> &g
;
> Xeno Amess
>
> From: Gary Gregory
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2025 9:00:21 PM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [GH] (commons-fileupload/master): Workflow run "Java CI" failed!
>
> ping, the build is failing
>
> Gary
>
> On Sat,
Hi,
What about this fix?
https://github.com/apache/commons-fileupload/pull/428
Regards,
Sigee
Gary Gregory ezt írta (időpont: 2025. júl. 15., K,
15:02):
> ping, the build is failing
>
> Gary
>
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 7:25 PM Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This breaks the buil
emm I'm not sure, do you want me help?
Xeno Amess
From: Gary Gregory
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2025 9:00:21 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [GH] (commons-fileupload/master): Workflow run "Java CI" failed!
ping, the build is failing
Ga
ping, the build is failing
Gary
On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 7:25 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This breaks the build due to illegal characters in Javadoc comments.
>
> Gary
>
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2025, 16:04 GitBox wrote:
>>
>>
>> The GitHub Actions job "Java CI" on commons-fileupload.git/mas
The build is still broken.
Adding a maven directory to git to all repositories on the planet can't be
right and should be considered a bug. Why not ignore that folder from the
root git ignore file?
Gary
On Sun, Jul 13, 2025, 14:45 GitBox wrote:
>
> The GitHub Actions job "Java CI" on commons-f
--
> > > [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> > > [INFO]
> > >
> > > [INFO] Total time: 3.491 s
> > > [
-
> > [INFO] Total time: 3.491 s
> > [INFO] Finished at: 2025-07-13T00:54:26+02:00
> > [INFO]
> > --------
Hello J,
Why duplicate Commons IO's DeferredFileOutputStream? It seems better
to reuse than to duplicate or reinvent the wheel.
If the new class is required, can Commons IO be improved instead to
meet FileUpload's needs?
If not, does the new class need to be public?
TY!
Gary
On Sat, Jul 12, 20
-13T00:54:26+02:00
> [INFO]
>
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.spdx:spdx-maven-plugin:1.0.2:createSPDX (default-cli) on project
> commons-fileupload2-distribution: Ex
Please run a local build with "mvn" by itself before pushing to avoid
breaking the build ;-)
Gary
On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 6:52 AM GitBox wrote:
>
>
> The GitHub Actions job "Java CI" on commons-fileupload.git/master has failed.
> Run started by GitHub user asf-gitbox-commits (triggered by
> asf
Hi all,
This breaks the build due to illegal characters in Javadoc comments.
Gary
On Sat, Jul 12, 2025, 16:04 GitBox wrote:
>
> The GitHub Actions job "Java CI" on commons-fileupload.git/master has
> failed.
> Run started by GitHub user asf-gitbox-commits (triggered by
> asf-gitbox-commits).
>
+1
All checks out….and again Thank you Gary!!
> On Jul 6, 2025, at 8:16 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> Validator 1.9.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache
> Commons Validator 1.10.0.
>
> Apache Commons Validator 1
+1
- Site good
- Tests on java 8, 11, 17, 21
- Signatures good
- Reports good
Thank you Gary for all you do!
> On Jul 6, 2025, at 1:51 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> Lang 3.17.0 was released, so I would like to release Ap
My +1
Gary
On Sun, Jul 6, 2025, 13:51 Gary Gregory wrote:
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> Lang 3.17.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons
> Lang 3.18.0.
>
> Apache Commons Lang 3.18.0 RC2 is available for review here:
> https://di
Hi Gary,
On 6.07.2025 19:51, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Please review the release candidate and vote.
> This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now.
>
> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> [ ] +0 OK, but...
> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
My +1
Gary
On Sun, Jul 6, 2025 at 8:16 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> Validator 1.9.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache
> Commons Validator 1.10.0.
>
> Apache Commons Validator 1.10.0 RC1 is available for review her
Hi Gary,
On 6.07.2025 14:16, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Please review the release candidate and vote.
> This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now.
>
> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> [ ] +0 OK, but...
> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
Hi Gary,
On 5.07.2025 01:00, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Please review the release candidate and vote.
> This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now.
>
> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> [ ] +0 OK, but...
> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
Matt,
A vote to publish a release candidate is in progress started yesterday.
Gary
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 9:11 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: Gary Gregory
> Date: Fri, Jun 20, 2025, 09:11
> Subject: Re: [LANG] [Question] Antici
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 13:42, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 12:52, sebb wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 12:39, Niall Pemberton
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 12:02, Niall Pemberton > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 11:02, Arnout Engelen
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 12:52, sebb wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 12:39, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 12:02, Niall Pemberton >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 11:02, Arnout Engelen
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> To make it clearer that 'Dormant'
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 12:39, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 12:02, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 11:02, Arnout Engelen wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> To make it clearer that 'Dormant' components are not actively maintained,
> >> I
> >> think it would be
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 12:02, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 11:02, Arnout Engelen wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> To make it clearer that 'Dormant' components are not actively maintained,
>> I
>> think it would be good if we marked GitHub repo's for those as 'Archived'.
>> AFAICS those a
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 11:02, Arnout Engelen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> To make it clearer that 'Dormant' components are not actively maintained, I
> think it would be good if we marked GitHub repo's for those as 'Archived'.
> AFAICS those are:
>
> https://github.com/apache/commons-chain
> https://github.c
My +1
Gary
On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 8:10 AM Alex Herbert wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Installed from the tag and tested using default mvn build on commons-lang
> and commons-statistics using JDK 21 and 8:
>
> Apache Maven 3.9.9 (8e8579a9e76f7d015ee5ec7bfcdc97d260186937)
> Maven home: /Users/ah403/software/a
Yes, I think I did. I'll fix that.
Mark
On 16/06/2025 15:05, Gary Gregory wrote:
Hi Mark,
You probably meant to update the 1.x branch as the branches names "release"
get merged into in order the create releases.
Gary
On Mon, Jun 16, 2025, 08:32 wrote:
This is an automated email from the A
Hi Mark,
You probably meant to update the 1.x branch as the branches names "release"
get merged into in order the create releases.
Gary
On Mon, Jun 16, 2025, 08:32 wrote:
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> markt pushed a commit to branch release-1.x
> in
+1
Installed from the tag and tested using default mvn build on commons-lang
and commons-statistics using JDK 21 and 8:
Apache Maven 3.9.9 (8e8579a9e76f7d015ee5ec7bfcdc97d260186937)
Maven home: /Users/ah403/software/apache-maven-3
Java version: 21.0.7, vendor: Eclipse Adoptium, runtime:
/Library/
On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 6:53 PM Niall Pemberton
wrote:
>
> File upload 1.6 was released with an accelerated 24hr voting period. This
> should be mentioned in the board report.
>
> https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#expedited-releases
TY Niall!
Done:
Sendingboard_agenda_202
My +1
Gary
On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 4:08 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed two (2) bugs since Apache Commons FileUpload 2.0.0-M3
> was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons FileUpload
> 2.0.0-M4. This is a 24-hour release vote.
>
> Apache Commons FileUpload 2.0.0-M4 RC1 is av
+1 (binding)
Mark
On 13/06/2025 21:08, Gary Gregory wrote:
We have fixed two (2) bugs since Apache Commons FileUpload 2.0.0-M3
was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons FileUpload
2.0.0-M4. This is a 24-hour release vote.
Apache Commons FileUpload 2.0.0-M4 RC1 is available for r
+1 (Binding)
On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 10:08 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed two (2) bugs since Apache Commons FileUpload 2.0.0-M3
> was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons FileUpload
> 2.0.0-M4. This is a 24-hour release vote.
>
> Apache Commons FileUpload 2.0.0-M4 RC1 is
File upload 1.6 was released with an accelerated 24hr voting period. This
should be mentioned in the board report.
https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#expedited-releases
Niall
On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 at 00:16, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Here is the draft of the Apache Commons B
On Tue, Jun 10, 2025, 09:04 Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2025, 12:32 wrote:
> > Exclude files from the Rat scan, that are generated by Eclipse.
> On 9.06.2025 19:40, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > I've never needed this before and I use Eclipse as well. So I wonder why
> > you
Hi Gary,
On Mon, Jun 9, 2025, 12:32 wrote:
> Exclude files from the Rat scan, that are generated by Eclipse.
On 9.06.2025 19:40, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I've never needed this before and I use Eclipse as well. So I wonder why
> you need it.
Apache RAT excludes files listed in `.gitignore` by defau
Hi Jochen,
I've never needed this before and I use Eclipse as well. So I wonder why
you need it.
Gary
On Mon, Jun 9, 2025, 12:32 wrote:
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> jochen pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/re
Hi Jochen,
I don't have a canned solution unfortunately. I am an Eclipse fan but the
m2e plug-in seems to fall short sometimes with multi-module projects. Since
we have a few MM projects in Commons, it would be nice to have a template
to follow.
Starting with an m2e PR seems reasonable but that m
Hi Henri,
It looks like a problem remains.
Gary
On Sat, Jun 7, 2025, 04:14 GitBox wrote:
>
> The GitHub Actions job "Java CI" on commons-jexl.git/JEXL-440 has failed.
> Run started by GitHub user henrib (triggered by henrib).
>
> Head commit for run:
> 5a32d06d94f8a78eadbc892d764f67770943c246
My +1
Gary
On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 11:25 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> FileUpload 1.5 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons
> FileUpload 1.6.0.
>
> Apache Commons FileUpload 1.6.0 RC1 is available for review her
[+1] (binding)
Build & tests ok; site & javadoc look good; reports check.
Build using:
mvn clean install site -s "$HOME/.m2/commons-settings.xml"
On:
Apache Maven 3.8.6 (84538c9988a25aec085021c365c560670ad80f63)
Maven home: /Users/hbiestro/Java/apache-maven-3.8.6
Java version: 21.0.3, vendor: A
+1 (binding)
> On Jun 5, 2025, at 11:25 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> FileUpload 1.5 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons
> FileUpload 1.6.0.
>
> Apache Commons FileUpload 1.6.0 RC1 is available for review h
+1 (Binding)
On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 5:27 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> FileUpload 1.5 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons
> FileUpload 1.6.0.
>
> Apache Commons FileUpload 1.6.0 RC1 is available for review her
lso the snapshot of lang3 .. Is this going to be
> released too or should we use the latest release?
>
> Best regards,
> Mehmet
>
> From: Gary Gregory
> Sent: Monday, June 2, 2025 4:19 PM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [RESULT
Hi,
Thank you. We were using also the snapshot of lang3 .. Is this going to be
released too or should we use the latest release?
Best regards,
Mehmet
From: Gary Gregory
Sent: Monday, June 2, 2025 4:19 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE
ce.
>
> Best regards,
> Mehmet
>
>
> From: Karaman, Mehmet
> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2025 2:37 PM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE][LAZY] Release Apache Commons Parent 82 based
> on RC1
>
> Hi,
>
> Is t
Hi,
Is there a problem with the compress library or is the release skipped? Thanks
in advance.
Best regards,
Mehmet
From: Karaman, Mehmet
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2025 2:37 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE][LAZY] Release Apache Commons
I've checked:
* commons-beanutils-2.0.0-M2-RC1 corresponds to
5d09ef79376511519b0b4aafcb5bbe79a70bd3c7
* sha512 of the 2 source archives match
dca62e297ac5b87caaf63c6793764a8ce743e2539766dd59588ab319d5051a5adaa145aba584c38d0fa0624e481d4d0584629bf88f56785613fb87bf4b7bc4b9
and
3097dce40ff3c62db1f330
I checked:
* 1.2.0-M2 corresponds to a75dde28fe9e340a2f89c349f05a4ee5281417be
* sha512 of the 2 source archives match
a64cd4d283ca0afa2351ee208de5617fe568e885ea764fd52037e91714a4a1f3ffbe10217a520d1d89722acf0a31576144b71a49c13bd10fe03689a7565a1a82
and
d9326c635bc316465e47a38a894635e192b069576a07163
+1
Tested on open jdk 21.0.7, Ubuntu 24.10. Build, reports, tests, sigs,
release notes, backward compat all good.
One ridiculously minor nit: in the release notes, it says
Have fun!
-Apache Commons BCEL team
This comes from /changes/release-notes.vm. Not worth re-rolling, IMO, but
should
On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 3:10 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Note that the svn commit for the dev files is now 77119 due to trying
> to release two versions simultaneously.
> I checked the hashes of the files in revision 77119 and they match those
> of this vote thread.
>
> However, there is a typo in
On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 3:22 PM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
>
> Hi Gary,
>
> On 25.05.2025 21:09, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 12:54 PM Piotr P. Karwasz
> >> It looks like the release candidate for Apache Commons BeanUtils
> >> 1.11.0 (RC1) was unintentionally removed in revision 77
Hi Gary,
On 25.05.2025 21:09, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 12:54 PM Piotr P. Karwasz
>> It looks like the release candidate for Apache Commons BeanUtils
>> 1.11.0 (RC1) was unintentionally removed in revision 77117.
>>
>> Fortunately, it's still accessible via the previous revisio
My +1
Gary
On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 10:18 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> BeanUtils 2.0.0-M1 was released, so I would like to release Apache
> Commons BeanUtils 2.0.0-M2.
>
> Apache Commons BeanUtils 2.0.0-M2 RC1 is available for r
My +1
Gary
On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 9:27 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.11.0 based on RC1
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> BeanUtils 1.10.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache
> Commons BeanUtils 1.11.0.
>
Note that the svn commit for the dev files is now 77119 due to trying
to release two versions simultaneously.
Gary
On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 10:18 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> BeanUtils 2.0.0-M1 was released, so I would like to r
On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 12:54 PM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
>
> Hi Gary,
>
> On 25.05.2025 15:27, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.11.0 RC1 is available for review here:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/beanutils/1.11.0-RC1
> > (svn revision 77116)
>
> It looks
Hi Gary,
On 25.05.2025 16:18, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Please review the release candidate and vote.
> This vote will close no sooner than 24 hours from now.
>
> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> [ ] +0 OK, but...
> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
Hi Gary,
On 25.05.2025 at 15:27, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Please review the release candidate and vote.
> This vote will close no sooner than 24 hours from now.
>
> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> [ ] +0 OK, but...
> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because.
Hi Gary,
On 25.05.2025 15:27, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.11.0 RC1 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/beanutils/1.11.0-RC1
> (svn revision 77116)
It looks like the release candidate for Apache Commons BeanUtils
1.11.0 (RC1) was
+1 non binding Tested this in my local code and all is working well.
On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 10:19 AM Gary Gregory
wrote:
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> BeanUtils 2.0.0-M1 was released, so I would like to release Apache
> Commons BeanUtils 2.0.0-M2.
>
>
Hi Henrib,
"lots of Checkstyle warnings" and "Vector" have been addressed in git master
post-release.
TY,
Gary
On 2025/05/23 12:37:28 Henri Biestro wrote:
> [+1]
>
> Build & tests ok; site & javadoc look good; reports check.
> Nits: JIRA report has of issues without a fix version; lots of Chec
> On May 24, 2025, at 5:53 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 24, 2025, 20:22 Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> The [pool] unit tests in the 2_X branch are riddled with deprecation
>> warnings mostly due to either changed method names or legacy time-related
>> methods where the non-deprecated ve
On Sat, May 24, 2025, 20:22 Phil Steitz wrote:
> The [pool] unit tests in the 2_X branch are riddled with deprecation
> warnings mostly due to either changed method names or legacy time-related
> methods where the non-deprecated version takes a Duration instead of a
> long. I am on the fence as
[+1]
Build & tests ok; site & javadoc look good; reports check.
Nits: JIRA report has of issues without a fix version; lots of Checkstyle
warnings; Jacoco coverage is low; old code (Vector...);
Built using: mvn clean install site -s "$HOME/.m2/commons-settings.xml"
-Ddoclint=none
On: Apache M
I guess that is a question for the JasperReports team.
Melloware
@melloware on GitHub
> On May 20, 2025, at 5:37 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Creating a PR in JasperReports runs... zero tests?
>
> Gary
>
>
>> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 4:41 PM Melloware Inc
>> wrote:
>>
>> Note I have alrea
Creating a PR in JasperReports runs... zero tests?
Gary
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 4:41 PM Melloware Inc
wrote:
> Note I have already submitted a JasperReports PR against BeanUtils 2.0.0-M1
> months ago but the author doesn't like its an M1.
>
> See: https://github.com/Jaspersoft/jasperreports/pu
Note I have already submitted a JasperReports PR against BeanUtils 2.0.0-M1
months ago but the author doesn't like its an M1.
See: https://github.com/Jaspersoft/jasperreports/pull/488
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 1:49 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi Zach,
>
> There is no official or unofficial release d
Hi Zach,
There is no official or unofficial release date yet because I would like to
get more community feedback before we set the API in stone for 2.0.0.
It would be painful if your port from 1.x to 2.x revealed issues requiring
API changes that we couldn't make until 3.x. Would you use 2.0.0-M1
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 11:24 AM Melloware Inc
wrote:
> I +1 this vote for an official BeanUtils 2.0.0 release. I am using it in
> Production as M1 for months now without issue.
>
Good to know! TY.
Have you tried a snapshot from git master?
It would be good to know if there are any issues ther
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 11:48 AM Alex Herbert
wrote:
> This change breaks the code example on how to use the class, see below:
>
> On Tue, 20 May 2025 at 15:51, wrote:
>
> > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
> >
> > ggregory pushed a commit to branch master
> >
This change breaks the code example on how to use the class, see below:
On Tue, 20 May 2025 at 15:51, wrote:
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> ggregory pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-text.git
>
I +1 this vote for an official BeanUtils 2.0.0 release. I am using it in
Production as M1 for months now without issue.
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 10:47 AM Zach Dove wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I’d like to ask about the plans for an official release of BeanUtils2
> (2.0.0 final). We are tracking this for o
That all sounds reasonable to me.
Gary
On Mon, May 19, 2025, 20:04 Phil Steitz wrote:
> The javadoc suggests that for both GKOP and GOP, this method is a no-op if
> there is no capacity to add to the pool when it is invoked. But at least
> for GOP, since the method calls create and create can
+1 (non binding)
(sorry this won't reply in original thread -- I missed the original email
and cannot get the "reply to this thread" link to work with Gmail)
ping ;-)
Gary
On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 9:02 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> FileUpload 2.0.0-M2 was released, so I would like to release Apache
> Commons FileUpload 2.0.0-M3.
>
> Apache Commons FileUpload 2.0.0-M3 RC1 is available fo
My +1
Gary
On Fri, May 16, 2025, 16:02 Rob Tompkins wrote:
> +1 all looks good.
>
>
> Thank you as always!!
>
> > On May 16, 2025, at 10:27 AM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> >
> > We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons Exec
> > 1.4.0 was released, so I would like to rel
+1 all looks good.
Thank you as always!!
> On May 16, 2025, at 10:27 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons Exec
> 1.4.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons Exec 1.5.0.
>
> Apache Commons Exec 1.5.0 RC1 is available
My +1
Gary
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 10:00 AM Alex Herbert
wrote:
> +1
>
> Installed locally from the tag. Built Statistics and Lang using JDK 8 and
> 21:
>
> Apache Maven 3.9.9 (8e8579a9e76f7d015ee5ec7bfcdc97d260186937)
> Maven home: /Users/ah403/software/apache-maven-3
> Java version: 21.0.6, v
+1
Installed locally from the tag. Built Statistics and Lang using JDK 8 and
21:
Apache Maven 3.9.9 (8e8579a9e76f7d015ee5ec7bfcdc97d260186937)
Maven home: /Users/ah403/software/apache-maven-3
Java version: 21.0.6, vendor: Eclipse Adoptium, runtime:
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/temurin-21.jdk
I should have fixed the ${commons.sha512list} with:
commons-fileupload2-2.0.0-M3-src.tar.gz
sha512:
a64cd4d283ca0afa2351ee208de5617fe568e885ea764fd52037e91714a4a1f3ffbe10217a520d1d89722acf0a31576144b71a49c13bd10fe03689a7565a1a82
commons-fileupload2-2.0.0-M3-src.zip
sha512:
d9326c635bc316465e47a
+1
> On May 8, 2025, at 9:02 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> FileUpload 2.0.0-M2 was released, so I would like to release Apache
> Commons FileUpload 2.0.0-M3.
>
> Apache Commons FileUpload 2.0.0-M3 RC1 is available for review
My +1
Gary
On Thu, May 8, 2025, 21:02 Gary Gregory wrote:
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> FileUpload 2.0.0-M2 was released, so I would like to release Apache
> Commons FileUpload 2.0.0-M3.
>
> Apache Commons FileUpload 2.0.0-M3 RC1 is available for rev
First, I think I'll cut another 1.x release since we've had minor
changes gathering dust over the past 16 months
Gary
On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 5:52 PM Gary D. Gregory wrote:
>
> Coming back around to this, I think we should:
>
> The POLL indicates to me the bump to Java 11 is OK.
>
> I propose to:
Coming back around to this, I think we should:
The POLL indicates to me the bump to Java 11 is OK.
I propose to:
- Create a branch called "1.x" from master
- Raise the minimum platform to Java 11 for in master and change the version to
2.0.0-SNAPSHOT (currently 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT). Keep the package
1 - 100 of 11234 matches
Mail list logo
