Re: [VFS] Release 2.5.1 to address incompatibility

Uh, glad it was reported soon and you can cut a new release Gary. Will try to monitor inbox to review the release once it's out. CheersBruno On Monday, 6 January 2020, 2:07:19 am NZDT, Gary Gregory wrote: Hi All: It looks like Commons VFS 2.5.0 contains an incompatibility for existin

Re: [vfs] release notes (was: [jira] [Commented] (VFS-576) Simplify logging)

There have been some dependency upgrades, but I think its better to not introduce too many complications for 2.0 users. > Am 18.09.2015 um 21:10 schrieb Gary Gregory : > > I would also review all third party jars to make sure we are current. > > I would not mind revisiting our Java requirement

Re: [vfs] release notes (was: [jira] [Commented] (VFS-576) Simplify logging)

I would also review all third party jars to make sure we are current. I would not mind revisiting our Java requirement and use Java 7, but that can wait for 2.2. Gary On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > I would manually edit the file to add the major themes of the release.

Re: [vfs] release notes (was: [jira] [Commented] (VFS-576) Simplify logging)

I would manually edit the file to add the major themes of the release. Gary On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Bernd wrote: > Gregory, > > I think now we are ready for an release. There are some open things > but I think it is better to come to an end. One thing which is open is > writing some re

Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again)

.1? I'd be happy to fix the versions for these > issues in JIRA, but I don't have the privs. > > Dave > > - Original Message - > > From: "Bernd Eckenfels" > To: "Commons Developers List" > Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 1:15:41

Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again)

om: "Bernd Eckenfels" To: "Commons Developers List" Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 1:15:41 AM Subject: Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again) Hello, Thanks for looking into this. Let me reply inline (and prune the mail): Am Tue, 30 Dec 2014 12:03:20 -0500 schrieb :

Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again)

Hello, Thanks for looking into this. Let me reply inline (and prune the mail): Am Tue, 30 Dec 2014 12:03:20 -0500 schrieb : > > a) check the src/changes/changes.xml: all action entries with bug > > numbers since the last release should be marked resolved (not > > closed - actually all bugs on th

RE: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again)

> -Original Message- > From: Bernd Eckenfels [mailto:e...@zusammenkunft.net] > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 6:28 PM > To: Commons Developers List > Cc: dlmar...@comcast.net > Subject: Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again) > > Hello, > > Am Wed,

Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again)

; From: "Bernd Eckenfels" > To: "Commons Developers List" > Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2014 3:29:45 AM > Subject: Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again) > > Hello, > > I checked the release-plugin documentation and I cannot find a way to > sp

Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again)

Goers" > Gesendet: ‎03.‎12.‎2014 06:52 > An: "Commons Developers List" > Betreff: Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again) > >> >>> Unfortunately, I don’t believe I >>> documented the release process but it should be similar to >>> http://wiki

Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again)

t; Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2014 3:29:45 AM Subject: Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again) Hello, I checked the release-plugin documentation and I cannot find a way to specify different tags for the usage inside the prepared POM and the Tag which should be used for actually tagging

Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again)

Hello, I checked the release-plugin documentation and I cannot find a way to specify different tags for the usage inside the prepared POM and the Tag which should be used for actually tagging. I also think this is pretty uncommon, and I would go with using the final release version tag (commons-v

Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again)

> > > Unfortunately, I don’t believe I > > documented the release process but it should be similar to > > http://wiki.apache.org/logging/Log4j2ReleaseGuide > > > > >

Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again)

On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > Hello, > > ok, lets start another try to get VFS released. (and refresh my > memories who is volunteering for the RM? - I would do it but I think we > need a PMC at close hand). > > Currently are 3 open blocker bugs, for one I have a patch

Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again)

Is there a chance to get VFS-180 in 2.1? On 03/12/14 01:51, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: Hello, ok, lets start another try to get VFS released. (and refresh my memories who is volunteering for the RM? - I would do it but I think we need a PMC at close hand). Currently are 3 open blocker bugs, for on

Re: [VFS] Release 2.1

Hello, we are working on a release. Thats why I closed or moved most of the blockers. It would be good if you can have a look at the remaining blockers (and maybe also check if all the open bugs are not critical). Gruss Bernd Am Mon, 9 Jun 2014 20:53:28 + (UTC) schrieb dlmar...@comcast.net:

Re: [VFS] release preparation: clirr report

I'm not sure how fine grained control we have or want to get over Clirr. For now, I'd rather know about all the differences. We can document how to interpret the Clirr report on the site and release notes as well. Gary On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > Hello, > > in prep

RE: VFS release

> -Original Message- > From: Jörg Schaible [mailto:joerg.schai...@gmx.de] > Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 14:11 > To: dev@commons.apache.org > Subject: RE: VFS release > > Gary Gregory wrote: > > > How about warnings like: > > > > De

RE: VFS release

Gary Gregory wrote: > How about warnings like: > > Description ResourcePathLocationType > The serializable class FileNotFolderException does not declare a static > final serialVersionUID field of type long FileNotFolderException.java > /commons-vfs2/src/main/java/org/ap

RE: VFS release

lph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 18:59 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: VFS release > > > On Nov 30, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > > > Ok, how about pushing checkstyle.xml up to commons-parent and associated >

RE: VFS release

> -Original Message- > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 18:59 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: VFS release > > > On Nov 30, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > > > Ok,

Re: VFS release

On Nov 30, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Ok, how about pushing checkstyle.xml up to commons-parent and associated > Maven magic? > Can we do that after releasing VFS 2.0? Ralph

RE: VFS release

> -Original Message- > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 16:24 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: VFS release > > > On Nov 30, 2010, at 1:18 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > >> -Original

Re: VFS release

On Nov 30, 2010, at 1:20 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 16:09 >> To: Commons Developers List >> Subject: Re: VFS release >> >> >>

Re: VFS release

On Nov 30, 2010, at 1:18 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 16:06 >> To: Commons Developers List >> Subject: Re: VFS release >> >>

RE: VFS release

> -Original Message- > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 16:09 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: VFS release > > > On Nov 30, 2010, at 1:02 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> > >> Altho

RE: VFS release

> -Original Message- > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 16:06 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: VFS release > > > On Nov 30, 2010, at 12:57 PM, sebb wrote: > > > On 30 November 2010 20:3

Re: VFS release

On Nov 30, 2010, at 1:02 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> >> Although the wiki is fine it would be better to use a common checkstyle.xml. > > Yes! Can we put that in commons-parent and have it kick in automagically? > Not unless commons-parent is changed from a project of type pom to a project of t

Re: VFS release

On Nov 30, 2010, at 12:57 PM, sebb wrote: > On 30 November 2010 20:38, Gary Gregory wrote: >> Ok, I've added some entries here: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CodeStyle > > Thanks. > But I think the page should be flagged as DRAFT until there is general > agreement. > For example, I think impor

Re: VFS release

On 30 November 2010 21:00, Ralph Goers wrote: > > On Nov 30, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> Ok, I've added some entries here: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CodeStyle >> >> See the latest VFS commits for this order of imports: java, javax, org, com. >> Same as [io] and [lang]. >> > >

RE: VFS release

> -Original Message- > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 16:00 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: VFS release > > > On Nov 30, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > Ok, I

Re: VFS release

On Nov 30, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Ok, I've added some entries here: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CodeStyle > > See the latest VFS commits for this order of imports: java, javax, org, com. > Same as [io] and [lang]. > Although the wiki is fine it would be better to use a co

RE: VFS release

> -Original Message- > From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 15:57 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: VFS release > > On 30 November 2010 20:38, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Ok, I've added some entries here: http://w

Re: VFS release

ailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 14:43 >> To: Commons Developers List >> Subject: Re: VFS release >> >> >> On Nov 30, 2010, at 9:28 AM, sebb wrote: >> >> > On 30 November 2010 17:16, Gary Gregory >> wrote

RE: VFS release

sday, November 30, 2010 14:43 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: VFS release > > > On Nov 30, 2010, at 9:28 AM, sebb wrote: > > > On 30 November 2010 17:16, Gary Gregory > wrote: > >> Hm... I just noticed that VFS follows a different import conven

Re: VFS release

On Nov 30, 2010, at 9:28 AM, sebb wrote: > On 30 November 2010 17:16, Gary Gregory wrote: >> Hm... I just noticed that VFS follows a different import convention that >> other [commons] projects. >> >> In [lang] and [io] for example, we list java packages first and the >> project's packages la

Re: VFS release

ard imports, except perhaps for static imports of constants. > > Gary > >> -Original Message- >> From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 12:00 >> To: Commons Developers List >> Subject: Re: VFS release &g

RE: VFS release

wiki this as a guideline? Too micro? Gary > -Original Message- > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 12:00 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: VFS release > > > On Nov 30, 2010, at 8:40 AM,

RE: VFS release

> -Original Message- > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 12:00 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: VFS release > > > On Nov 30, 2010, at 8:40 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > Hi All: &g

Re: VFS release

On Nov 30, 2010, at 8:40 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hi All: > > I've removed unused imports. > > Any objection to organizing imports consistently? > Actually, those all show up in the checkstyle report. The ones you changed are all a consequence of the recent changes I made. I'd missed those

RE: VFS release

Hi All: I've removed unused imports. Any objection to organizing imports consistently? Gary > -Original Message- > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2010 17:51 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: VFS release > > I've gone through

RE: VFS release

> -Original Message- > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2010 17:51 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: VFS release > > I've gone through Jira and tried to make fixes where it looked like they would > require changes that could impact

RE: VFS release

Well, this is weird, now that I imported the project into Eclipse with m2eclipse, I get 'mvn test': [INFO] Scanning for projects... [WARNING] [WARNING] Some problems were encountered while building the effective model for org.apache.commons:commons-vfs2-sandbox:jar:2.0-SNAPSHOT [WARNING] 'build.

RE: VFS release

Any objection to adding a "bin" directory to svn:ignore to make the Eclipse project look clean? Gary > -Original Message- > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2010 17:51 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: VFS release > > I've gone

RE: VFS release

Looking good with m2eclipse! Gary > -Original Message- > From: Gary Gregory > Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 14:57 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: VFS release > > Hm... this? http://m2eclipse.sonatype.org/installing-m2eclipse.html > > Gary &

RE: VFS release

Hm... this? http://m2eclipse.sonatype.org/installing-m2eclipse.html Gary > -Original Message- > From: ralph.goers @dslextreme.com [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 14:50 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: VFS release >

Re: VFS release

Eclipse doesn't have the ability to import a maven project like IntelliJ does? I know the Maven team is deprecating the idea plugin because IntelliJ does a better job. I thought they were also deprecating the eclipse plugin for the same reason. I'd have to go back through the maven dev list for th

RE: VFS release

Hi All: Is Maven 3 fully supported to build VFS? I was able to run 'mvn test' successfully but I got: >mvn test [INFO] Scanning for projects... [WARNING] [WARNING] Some problems were encountered while building the effective model for org.apache.commons:commons-vfs2:jar:2.0-SNAPSHOT [WARNING] 'b

Re: VFS release

On Nov 27, 2010, at 3:18 PM, sebb wrote: > On 27 November 2010 22:50, Ralph Goers wrote: >> I've gone through Jira and tried to make fixes where it looked like they >> would require changes that could impact binary compatibility. > > Binary compatibility with what? > V2.0. Since we are brea

Re: VFS release

On 27 November 2010 22:50, Ralph Goers wrote: > I've gone through Jira and tried to make fixes where it looked like they > would require changes that could impact binary compatibility. Binary compatibility with what? > There are many bugs related to the FTP variants and after taking several >