Torsten Curdt wrote:
>>> I feel kind of the opposite -- RAT is an important tool that's required
>>> of all the Incubator projects, but pretty widely integrated (at least in
>>> Java land) outside of the Incubator as a tool to help check ASF
>>> policies. To me, that's a big scope and an important
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <
> chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>
>> I feel kind of the opposite -- RAT is an important tool that's required of
>> all the Incubator projects, but pretty widely integra
>> I feel kind of the opposite -- RAT is an important tool that's required of
>> all the Incubator projects, but pretty widely integrated (at least in Java
>> land) outside of the Incubator as a tool to help check ASF policies. To me,
>> that's a big scope and an important community, and just based
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> I feel kind of the opposite -- RAT is an important tool that's required of
> all the Incubator projects, but pretty widely integrated (at least in Java
> land) outside of the Incubator as a tool to
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 07:00
> To: gene...@incubator.apache.org; rat-...@incubator.apache.org;
> dev@commons.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Future of RAT
>
> On 2010-08-10, Mattma
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
>
> WDYT?
I agree with others who've said RAT should consider going TLP.
-Rahul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-m
On Aug 10, 2010, at 7:03 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hi Stefan,
However, I'm not sure I get the whole reasoning below RE: TLP? Why
not
have a RAT TLP? The overhead of filing board reports and not knowing
anyone on the team that would be able to?
Jochen has sure be joking here. Th
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 3:40 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> If
> there will ever be a migration to a new license like ASL 3 or a
> another change of the header policy, then RAT will likely play a very
> important part in the process.
There's also an SPDX spec coming to describe the licensing in
pro
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 09:58, ant elder wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
> wrote:
>
>> However, I'm not sure I get the whole reasoning below RE: TLP? Why not have
>> a RAT TLP? The overhead of filing board reports and not knowing anyone on
>> the team that wou
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> However, I'm not sure I get the whole reasoning below RE: TLP? Why not have a
> RAT TLP? The overhead of filing board reports and not knowing anyone on the
> team that would be able to? Hen files them all the time (well he used
Hi Stefan,
>> However, I'm not sure I get the whole reasoning below RE: TLP? Why not
>> have a RAT TLP? The overhead of filing board reports and not knowing
>> anyone on the team that would be able to?
>
> Jochen has sure be joking here. The team list he pointed at contains at
> least two curren
On 2010-08-10, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> However, I'm not sure I get the whole reasoning below RE: TLP? Why not
> have a RAT TLP? The overhead of filing board reports and not knowing
> anyone on the team that would be able to?
Jochen has sure be joking here. The team list he pointed at c
Hi Jochen,
First off, congrats on even sending this email. I've often wondered by RAT is
still lingering in the Incubator when it's been pretty much widely used for a
long time, has a functional community, and keeps plugging forward with its
mission. So, first off, +1 to getting out of the Incu
On Aug 10, 2010, at 6:40 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> The question is: What's the target? RAT is way too small for an
> independent project. And I cannot imagine anybody of the current
> committers writing board reports. To me, a Rat TLP is no option. So we
> have the second possibility: Put it u
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> having just published a release of Apache RAT with the "-incubating"
> label, I'd though it is time to discuss the future of RAT. RAT is an
> incubator project since 18 months. It is not an overly busy project:
> The occasional fea
Forgot one possible issue: Currently, RAT has its own mailing lists,
which would be unusual for Commons. My personal choice would be to
leave this as it is, but that's of course also subject to discussion.
Jochen
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> having just pub
16 matches
Mail list logo
