:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 08:50
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Subject: Re: [pool] Reusing Config part 2
>>
>> On 10/25/10 11:26 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 08:50
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [pool] Reusing Config part 2
>
> On 10/25/10 11:26 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Thank you for working thr
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Siebert [mailto:smsi...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 08:43
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [pool] Reusing Config part 2
>
> Gary,
>
> I tossed this around as well, and noted these fields as a &
On 10/25/10 11:26 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
Thank you for working through this Simone.
I would like to discuss something I took for granted in my experimental patch
for [POOL-173]. I can see that you took and a more conservative (and safer ;)
approach in your version. I am glad to see this becau
Gary,
I tossed this around as well, and noted these fields as a "possible promote"
to the Abstract configuration, because I agree that there probably isn't a
"good" reason why one pool has those features and the other doesn't. (if
this is indeed the case, these would probably best be tracked in
