PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [math] trouble with SingularValueDecomposition
Note that the only reason that the order is unconstrained is because the two
corresponding singular values are equal.
Strictly speaking, for equal singular values, any unitary transformation of the
correspo
.7815621241949481 0.621551704865
> 0.06657590034559915 0.6238274168581248 0.7787213901449556
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunn...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2014 2:17 AM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [math] t
49556
-Original Message-
From: Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2014 2:17 AM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [math] trouble with SingularValueDecomposition
For what its worth, I tested the Mahout SVD which shares code lineage with the
Commons
For what its worth, I tested the Mahout SVD which shares code lineage with
the Commons Math implementation.
The results I got were:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *sum(abs(m - u * s * v')) = 4.31946146e-16S =1.002319690998
> 1.0023196909981. U =0.994059401897 0.067747631244
> -
And what exactly are the results you are getting?
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Patrick Meyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am using the SingularValueDecomposition class with a matrix but it gives
> me a different result than R. My knowledge of SVD is limited, so any advice
> is welcomed.
>
>
>
>
