Hi.
> > [...]
> >>
> >> Now is as good a time as any to think about how to correctly
> >> represent and handle missing data. The unfortunate thing is that in
> >> Java working with primitive doubles we are back to the old Fortran
> >> days of having no natural representation of a missing valu
-Original Message-
From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 12:45 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [math] correlation analysis with NaNs
On 11/19/12 3:31 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 09:27:41PM -0800, P
On 11/19/12 3:31 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 09:27:41PM -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 11/18/12 2:01 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>> On 11/09/2012 11:14 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 11/9/12 12:18 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Phil Steitz
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 09:27:41PM -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 11/18/12 2:01 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> > On 11/09/2012 11:14 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >> On 11/9/12 12:18 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >>>
> On 11/8/12 9:44 AM, Phil
On 11/18/12 2:01 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 11/09/2012 11:14 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 11/9/12 12:18 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>>
On 11/8/12 9:44 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 11/8/12 8:23 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>> On
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:01:18PM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 11/09/2012 11:14 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > On 11/9/12 12:18 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 11/8/12 9:44 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 11/8/12 8:23 AM, Gilles
On 11/09/2012 11:14 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 11/9/12 12:18 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/8/12 9:44 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 11/8/12 8:23 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 05:00:52PM +0100, Thomas Neidha
On 11/9/12 12:18 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> On 11/8/12 9:44 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 11/8/12 8:23 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 05:00:52PM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 11/08/2012 02:01 PM, Sébastien
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 11/8/12 9:44 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > On 11/8/12 8:23 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 05:00:52PM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> >>> On 11/08/2012 02:01 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2012/11/
On 11/8/12 9:44 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 11/8/12 8:23 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 05:00:52PM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>> On 11/08/2012 02:01 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
Hi,
2012/11/8 Gilles Sadowski :
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 09:39:00AM +0100,
On 11/8/12 8:23 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 05:00:52PM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> On 11/08/2012 02:01 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> 2012/11/8 Gilles Sadowski :
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 09:39:00AM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 05:00:52PM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 11/08/2012 02:01 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2012/11/8 Gilles Sadowski :
> >> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 09:39:00AM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> >>> Hi Patrick,
> >>>
> >>> On 11/07/2012 04:37 PM, Patrick Meyer
On 11/08/2012 02:01 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2012/11/8 Gilles Sadowski :
>> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 09:39:00AM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>> Hi Patrick,
>>>
>>> On 11/07/2012 04:37 PM, Patrick Meyer wrote:
I agree that it would be nice to have a constructor that allows you t
_before_ calling CM routines.
>
+1.
Sébastien
>
> Regards,
> Gilles
>
>> Thomas
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Thomas Neidhart [mailto:thomas.neidh...@gmail.com]
>> > Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 8:09 AM
>>
done _before_ calling CM routines.
Regards,
Gilles
> Thomas
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Thomas Neidhart [mailto:thomas.neidh...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 8:09 AM
> > To: u...@commons.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [math] correlation anal
o:thomas.neidh...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 8:09 AM
> To: u...@commons.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [math] correlation analysis with NaNs
>
> On 11/07/2012 01:38 PM, Patrick Meyer wrote:
>> You are getting values like 2.5 because of the default ties strat
16 matches
Mail list logo