Re: [math] correlation analysis with NaNs

2012-11-20 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. > > [...] > >> > >> Now is as good a time as any to think about how to correctly > >> represent and handle missing data. The unfortunate thing is that in > >> Java working with primitive doubles we are back to the old Fortran > >> days of having no natural representation of a missing valu

RE: [math] correlation analysis with NaNs

2012-11-20 Thread Patrick Meyer
-Original Message- From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 12:45 PM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [math] correlation analysis with NaNs On 11/19/12 3:31 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 09:27:41PM -0800, P

Re: [math] correlation analysis with NaNs

2012-11-19 Thread Phil Steitz
On 11/19/12 3:31 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 09:27:41PM -0800, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 11/18/12 2:01 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >>> On 11/09/2012 11:14 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: On 11/9/12 12:18 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Phil Steitz

Re: [math] correlation analysis with NaNs

2012-11-19 Thread Gilles Sadowski
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 09:27:41PM -0800, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 11/18/12 2:01 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > > On 11/09/2012 11:14 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> On 11/9/12 12:18 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > >>> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > >>> > On 11/8/12 9:44 AM, Phil

Re: [math] correlation analysis with NaNs

2012-11-18 Thread Phil Steitz
On 11/18/12 2:01 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 11/09/2012 11:14 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 11/9/12 12:18 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> On 11/8/12 9:44 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 11/8/12 8:23 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: >> On

Re: [math] correlation analysis with NaNs

2012-11-18 Thread Gilles Sadowski
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:01:18PM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 11/09/2012 11:14 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > > On 11/9/12 12:18 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> > >>> On 11/8/12 9:44 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 11/8/12 8:23 AM, Gilles

Re: [math] correlation analysis with NaNs

2012-11-18 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 11/09/2012 11:14 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 11/9/12 12:18 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> >>> On 11/8/12 9:44 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: On 11/8/12 8:23 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 05:00:52PM +0100, Thomas Neidha

Re: [math] correlation analysis with NaNs

2012-11-09 Thread Phil Steitz
On 11/9/12 12:18 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> On 11/8/12 9:44 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> On 11/8/12 8:23 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 05:00:52PM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 11/08/2012 02:01 PM, Sébastien

Re: [math] correlation analysis with NaNs

2012-11-09 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 11/8/12 9:44 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > > On 11/8/12 8:23 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 05:00:52PM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > >>> On 11/08/2012 02:01 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote: > Hi, > > 2012/11/

Re: [math] correlation analysis with NaNs

2012-11-08 Thread Phil Steitz
On 11/8/12 9:44 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 11/8/12 8:23 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 05:00:52PM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >>> On 11/08/2012 02:01 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote: Hi, 2012/11/8 Gilles Sadowski : > On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 09:39:00AM +0100,

Re: [math] correlation analysis with NaNs

2012-11-08 Thread Phil Steitz
On 11/8/12 8:23 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 05:00:52PM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >> On 11/08/2012 02:01 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> 2012/11/8 Gilles Sadowski : On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 09:39:00AM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > Hi Patrick, >

Re: [math] correlation analysis with NaNs

2012-11-08 Thread Gilles Sadowski
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 05:00:52PM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 11/08/2012 02:01 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > 2012/11/8 Gilles Sadowski : > >> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 09:39:00AM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > >>> Hi Patrick, > >>> > >>> On 11/07/2012 04:37 PM, Patrick Meyer

Re: [math] correlation analysis with NaNs

2012-11-08 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 11/08/2012 02:01 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote: > Hi, > > 2012/11/8 Gilles Sadowski : >> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 09:39:00AM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >>> Hi Patrick, >>> >>> On 11/07/2012 04:37 PM, Patrick Meyer wrote: I agree that it would be nice to have a constructor that allows you t

Re: [math] correlation analysis with NaNs

2012-11-08 Thread Sébastien Brisard
_before_ calling CM routines. > +1. Sébastien > > Regards, > Gilles > >> Thomas >> >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Thomas Neidhart [mailto:thomas.neidh...@gmail.com] >> > Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 8:09 AM >>

Re: [math] correlation analysis with NaNs

2012-11-08 Thread Gilles Sadowski
done _before_ calling CM routines. Regards, Gilles > Thomas > > > -Original Message- > > From: Thomas Neidhart [mailto:thomas.neidh...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 8:09 AM > > To: u...@commons.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [math] correlation anal

Re: [math] correlation analysis with NaNs

2012-11-08 Thread Thomas Neidhart
o:thomas.neidh...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 8:09 AM > To: u...@commons.apache.org > Subject: Re: [math] correlation analysis with NaNs > > On 11/07/2012 01:38 PM, Patrick Meyer wrote: >> You are getting values like 2.5 because of the default ties strat