On Jun 17, 2012, at 7:42, sebb wrote:
> On 17 June 2012 03:40, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 16, 2012, at 2:26 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>>> For now, I want @override so I am ok with 1.6 source but I is safe to
>>> the have 1.5 target? Commons-io >=2.3 is not pressing for VFS.
>>>
>>> Gary
>>
On 17 June 2012 03:40, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Jun 16, 2012, at 2:26 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> For now, I want @override so I am ok with 1.6 source but I is safe to
>> the have 1.5 target? Commons-io >=2.3 is not pressing for VFS.
>>
>> Gary
>
> Why would it not be? If that is all you are doi
On Jun 16, 2012, at 2:26 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> For now, I want @override so I am ok with 1.6 source but I is safe to
> the have 1.5 target? Commons-io >=2.3 is not pressing for VFS.
>
> Gary
Why would it not be? If that is all you are doing the @Override doesn't make it
to the actual Class
For now, I want @override so I am ok with 1.6 source but I is safe to
the have 1.5 target? Commons-io >=2.3 is not pressing for VFS.
Gary
On Jun 16, 2012, at 16:00, Ralph Goers wrote:
> @Override is a compile annotation so we could have source be 1.6 and target
> 1.5 for that. Do you have a p
@Override is a compile annotation so we could have source be 1.6 and target 1.5
for that. Do you have a pressing need to upgrade to commons-io 2.3? If that
is a necessity than I am OK with upgrading to Java 6 for the target. IOW, I'm
not in favor of upgrading just because "Java 5 is dead" but
Yes - I noticed that quite a while ago and have mentioned that VFS 3.0 should
be targeted at that. If you would like to help get that started we would be
happy to have the help!
Ralph
On Jun 15, 2012, at 8:45 AM, James Ring wrote:
> Has anybody looked at the Java 7 NIO File API?
>
> http://d
It's been mentioned before for a next gen VFS, a Java 7 only project obviously.
Gary
On Jun 15, 2012, at 11:45, James Ring wrote:
> Has anybody looked at the Java 7 NIO File API?
>
> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/nio/file/package-summary.html
>
> I think VFS should be able to ma
Has anybody looked at the Java 7 NIO File API?
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/nio/file/package-summary.html
I think VFS should be able to make great contributions to that by
porting filesystem implementations to it.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 7:46 AM, garydgregory wrote:
> (posting
(posting from nabble as I've lost the thread in my inbox)
I want to revive using Java 6 this for trunk. Java 5 is dead, no only is
forcing projects to update to the trunk stream from VFS 2.0.
In addition to the list below:
- Make VFS more attractive for new user/developers, new committers in th
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Thanks. We to we're taken by surprise by this as it was not discussed
> prior to the change. A
This has been backed out of SVN for now.
(from the JIRA:)
Whys:
- Make VFS more attractive for new user/developers, new committers in the
21st c
Thanks. We to we're taken by surprise by this as it was not discussed prior to
the change. As a rule the minimum version should only be changed if something
requires it. I'm waiting for a response from Gary as to why this was necessary
before asking him to revert it.
Ralph
On May 14, 2012, at
> FYI: I've updated VFS trunk to Java 6 to avoid getting stuck on older
> versions of jars and further moving VFS in the 21st century ;) Tasked
> as VFS-415.
I was happy to see VFS-414 and VFS-313 being fixed, thank you very much for
that! The change in VFS-415 however makes it impossible for us
12 matches
Mail list logo
