ter ideas, I think that is the
best way to handle this.
Phil
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 1:42 PM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [Math] MATH-894
>
> On 11/15/12 10:29 AM,
Yes. Sounds similar.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > The assign methods are inherited. The signatures are like
> > assign(DoubleFunction), assign(DoubleDoubleFunction, Matrix other) and so
> > on.
>
> OK, assign looks like what I was calling "evaluate" and
> DoubleFunc
On 11/15/12 10:56 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> On 11/15/12 10:29 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz
>> wrote:
Do you know how to do that with a primitive array? Can you provide
some sample code?
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 11/15/12 10:29 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz
> wrote:
> >
> >> Do you know how to do that with a primitive array? Can you provide
> >> some sample code?
> >>
> > You don't. See my next paragrap
.
-Original Message-
From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 1:42 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [Math] MATH-894
On 11/15/12 10:29 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> Do you know ho
On 11/15/12 10:29 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> Do you know how to do that with a primitive array? Can you provide
>> some sample code?
>>
> You don't. See my next paragraph.
>
> See the assign method in this class:
>
> https://github.com/apac
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Do you know how to do that with a primitive array? Can you provide
> some sample code?
>
You don't. See my next paragraph.
See the assign method in this class:
https://github.com/apache/mahout/blob/trunk/math/src/main/java/org/apache/mah
On 11/15/12 9:22 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> On 11/15/12 8:01 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>>> The typical answer to this when adding a functional method like compute
>> is to also add a view object. The rationale is that a small number of view
>> me
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 11/15/12 8:01 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> >
> > The typical answer to this when adding a functional method like compute
> is to also add a view object. The rationale is that a small number of view
> methods can be composed with a small number
On 11/15/12 8:01 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>
> The typical answer to this when adding a functional method like compute is to
> also add a view object. The rationale is that a small number of view methods
> can be composed with a small number of compute/aggregate methods to get the
> expressive powe
The typical answer to this when adding a functional method like compute is to
also add a view object. The rationale is that a small number of view methods
can be composed with a small number of compute/aggregate methods to get the
expressive power of what would otherwise require a vast array o
On 11/15/12 5:40 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hi.
>
>> These changes look fine to me and the addition of the compute method is
>> really nice.
> Oh, I should have asked whether you can also look at the source code in the
> trunk: Currently the "compute(UnivariateStatistic)" method is only
> impleme
Hi.
>
> These changes look fine to me and the addition of the compute method is
> really nice.
Oh, I should have asked whether you can also look at the source code in the
trunk: Currently the "compute(UnivariateStatistic)" method is only
implemented internally (in a private inner class of "Descr
aving.
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: Gilles Sadowski [mailto:gil...@harfang.homelinux.org]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 6:32 AM
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Math] MATH-894
Hi Patrick.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 02:38:07PM -0500, Patrick Meyer wrote:
> Please keep ResizeableDoub
Hi Patrick.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 02:38:07PM -0500, Patrick Meyer wrote:
> Please keep ResizeableDoubleArray as its own class. I find it very useful
> for more than descriptive statistics. I do like the idea of adding an apply
> method to it.
Could you please have a look at the JIRA page:
htt
he broken encapsulation, so maybe
its best to add the apply or "applyStatistic" method as described below.
Phil
>
> Patrick
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 1:23 PM
> To: Commons Developers List
: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [Math] MATH-894
On 11/12/12 6:05 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hi.
>
> What do you think about deprecating "getInternalValues"?
> Its only use is in "DescriptiveStatistics". I guess that the current
> usage could save some time (b
On 11/12/12 6:05 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hi.
>
> What do you think about deprecating "getInternalValues"?
> Its only use is in "DescriptiveStatistics". I guess that the current usage
> could save some time (by avoiding the creation of an array and copying the
> elements), so that acces to the
18 matches
Mail list logo
