On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 8:00 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 11 January 2014 12:40, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Don't forget about ? and Object...
>
> Remind me again what you mean here?
>
If anything can indeed be a map value or key, you can still define generics
with a ? or Object (depending on the case). T
On 11 January 2014 12:40, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Don't forget about ? and Object...
Remind me again what you mean here?
> G
>
> Original message
> From: sebb AT ASF
> Date:01/11/2014 06:44 (GMT-05:00)
> To: dev@commons.apache.org
> Subject: [EXEC] generics for EnvironmentUtil
Don't forget about ? and Object...
G
Original message
From: sebb AT ASF
Date:01/11/2014 06:44 (GMT-05:00)
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: [EXEC] generics for EnvironmentUtils
I reverted the contentious generics change.
However, I'm not sure there really is a problem
Hello Sebb,
2014/1/11 sebb AT ASF
> I reverted the contentious generics change.
>
> However, I'm not sure there really is a problem here.
>
> Adding the "wrong" generics can only affect existing users that also
> use generics, i.e. they must be using Java 1.5+
> Now if a Java 5 client calls a
