RE: [DISCUSS] Distribution jars and debug compiler setting...

2008-03-19 Thread Gary Gregory
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of James Carman > Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 12:41 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Distribution jars and debug compiler setting... > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Distribution jars and debug compiler setting...

2008-03-19 Thread James Carman
On 3/19/08, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What the argument for debug off? Saving disc space? Performance. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [DISCUSS] Distribution jars and debug compiler setting...

2008-03-19 Thread Henri Yandell
Debug on, and people who want it off can build it themselves with instructions we provide [so we need said instructions] :) Hen On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 6:37 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All, > > We were discussing in another thread about the merits of the > dependencies report

RE: [DISCUSS] Distribution jars and debug compiler setting...

2008-03-19 Thread Gary Gregory
I like debug on. When a customer has an issue that needed debugging level information it is tricky enough that we have to guide them on how to turn on debugging and other particulars for our software and then try again. Now, I'd have to either change our build to include debug jars instead of p