On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 1:46 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 19/01/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> Not really a DBCP only discussion at this point ...
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 1:20 PM, sebb wrote:
>> > On 18/01/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> >> I think whats being pointed out
>> >> here is tha
On 19/01/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> Not really a DBCP only discussion at this point ...
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 1:20 PM, sebb wrote:
> > On 18/01/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 6:22 AM, sebb wrote:
> >> > On 15/01/2009, Mark Thomas wrote:
> >> >> > From:
Not really a DBCP only discussion at this point ...
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 1:20 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 18/01/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 6:22 AM, sebb wrote:
>> > On 15/01/2009, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> >> > From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
>> >>
>> >>
On 18/01/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 6:22 AM, sebb wrote:
> > On 15/01/2009, Mark Thomas wrote:
> >> > From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> >> > > Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> >> > >>
> >>
> >> > >> Note th
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 6:22 AM, sebb wrote:
On 15/01/2009, Mark Thomas wrote:
From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
> Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> > Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> >>
Note that the above breaks binary and source compatibili
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 6:22 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 15/01/2009, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> > From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
>>
>> >
>> > Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>> > > Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> > >>
>>
>> > >> Note that the above breaks binary and source compatibility.
>> > Therefo
On 15/01/2009, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
>
> >
> > Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> > > Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> > >>
>
> > >> Note that the above breaks binary and source compatibility.
> > Therefore,
> > >> at the least, such changes deserve notable me
> From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
>
> Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> > Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> >>
> >> Note that the above breaks binary and source compatibility.
> Therefore,
> >> at the least, such changes deserve notable mentions in the release
> >> notes and often additional thoug
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 1:36 PM, wrote:
Author: sebb
Date: Wed Jan 14 10:36:07 2009
New Revision: 734473
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=734473&view=rev
Log:
Make non-private static fields final
Note that the above breaks binary and sou
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 1:36 PM, wrote:
Author: sebb
Date: Wed Jan 14 10:36:07 2009
New Revision: 734473
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=734473&view=rev
Log:
Make non-private static fields final
Note that the above breaks binary and source compatibility. Therefor
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 1:36 PM, wrote:
> Author: sebb
> Date: Wed Jan 14 10:36:07 2009
> New Revision: 734473
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=734473&view=rev
> Log:
> Make non-private static fields final
Note that the above breaks binary and source compatibility. Therefore,
at the le
11 matches
Mail list logo