to:seb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 11:48 AM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [BCEL] Java version
>
> On 13 August 2015 at 17:58, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > The POM sets the source version to Java 1.5 but the code does not
> > compile on Java 1.5.
>
I think 7 is fine. I would be hesitant to go all the way to 8 at this time.
Thanks,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 11:48 AM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [BCEL] Java version
On 13 August 2015 at 17:58, Gary
OK, I'll bump it up to Java 7.
Gary
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:47 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 13 August 2015 at 17:58, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > The POM sets the source version to Java 1.5 but the code does not compile
> > on Java 1.5.
> >
> > I say we just move the req to java 7 or 8 and move on.
>
>
On 13 August 2015 at 17:58, Gary Gregory wrote:
> The POM sets the source version to Java 1.5 but the code does not compile
> on Java 1.5.
>
> I say we just move the req to java 7 or 8 and move on.
I would be OK with Java 7 as a minimum.
I realise that I normally argue for the minimum Java versi
