Re: RDF commons testing

2017-01-30 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 10:20:46 +, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > BTW - in your approach, would it work to run the tests out of the box > from an IDE like Eclipse? I think that is quite important so Commons RDF > can be maintainable by many people in Apache Commons. They did run out of the box i

Re: RDF commons testing

2017-01-30 Thread Sergio Fernández
Thanks for the suggestion, Claude! I agree with Stian, do a PR with how the test suite would change, so then we are discussing about more concrete things. On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 09:08:27 +1100, Peter Ansell > wrote: > > Hi Claude, > >

Re: RDF commons testing

2017-01-30 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 09:08:27 +1100, Peter Ansell wrote: > Hi Claude, > Abstract test classes are working well for Commons RDF so far. Others > may benefit from your solution, so feel free to suggest the approach > to others who may be interested in exploring it. I would not dismiss Claude's sugge

Re: RDF commons testing

2017-01-29 Thread Peter Ansell
Hi Claude, Abstract test classes are working well for Commons RDF so far. Others may benefit from your solution, so feel free to suggest the approach to others who may be interested in exploring it. Cheers, Peter On 30 January 2017 at 03:11, Claude Warren wrote: > Peter, > > I have written a m

Re: RDF commons testing

2017-01-29 Thread Claude Warren
Peter, I have written a more detailed discussion of why abstract tests for interfaces pose problems ( https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/contract-testing-why-abstract-tests-enough-claude-warren-jr). I stand by my earlier assertions and offers. Claude On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 5:11 AM, Peter Ansell wr

Re: RDF commons testing

2017-01-28 Thread Peter Ansell
On 28 January 2017 at 21:08, Claude Warren wrote: > I see that RDF Commons is listed as a set of interfaces to be implemented > on top of various RDF implementations. I also see that there are abstract > tests for the interfaces. > > I would like to suggest that RDF commons look at using Junit Co

RDF commons testing

2017-01-28 Thread Claude Warren
I see that RDF Commons is listed as a set of interfaces to be implemented on top of various RDF implementations. I also see that there are abstract tests for the interfaces. I would like to suggest that RDF commons look at using Junit Contract tests (https://github.com/Claudenw/junit-contracts) w