Re: RC attempts

2008-06-14 Thread Matt Benson
--- Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/13/08, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > I'll mention this on the wiki if I remember > beyond the jet lag. > > > > > Done. :) > > -Rahul > > - > To un

Re: RC attempts

2008-06-14 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 6/13/08, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'll mention this on the wiki if I remember beyond the jet lag. > Done. -Rahul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE

Re: RC attempts

2008-06-13 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 6/13/08, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thanks for the notes, my condolences on the jet lag, :-) > and my apologies if I sounded like I was attacking you > personally; I certainly wasn't. > Bah, no, it didn't come across that way either. -Rahul ---

Re: RC attempts

2008-06-13 Thread Matt Benson
--- Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/12/08, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > --- James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > You need to use the "rc" profile when building > a > > > release candidate. > > > The default profile shouldn't be upda

Re: RC attempts

2008-06-13 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 6/12/08, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > You need to use the "rc" profile when building a > > release candidate. > > The default profile shouldn't be updating the site. > > We should have to > > turn on a "release" profile

Re: RC attempts

2008-06-13 Thread Matt Benson
--- Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Matt Benson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Update: Luckily pquerna was available on > #asfinfra > > and retrieved the production site from www before > it > > got synched with the new content. I couldn't get >

Re: RC attempts

2008-06-12 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Update: Luckily pquerna was available on #asfinfra > and retrieved the production site from www before it > got synched with the new content. I couldn't get > JXPATH_1_2 to build the Maven 1 site... though I did > find an

Re: RC attempts

2008-06-12 Thread Matt Benson
Update: Luckily pquerna was available on #asfinfra and retrieved the production site from www before it got synched with the new content. I couldn't get JXPATH_1_2 to build the Maven 1 site... though I did find an email trail where jcarman had had the same problem before: Could not find the clas

Re: RC attempts

2008-06-12 Thread Matt Benson
--- James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You're right, imagining the profanity makes this > message much more > enjoyable! :) I don't know about that, but I know that writing it without felt awfully stifling. > > You need to use the "rc" profile when building a > release candidate. > The

Re: RC attempts

2008-06-12 Thread James Carman
You're right, imagining the profanity makes this message much more enjoyable! :) You need to use the "rc" profile when building a release candidate. The default profile shouldn't be updating the site. We should have to turn on a "release" profile or something for that to happen. What command did

RC attempts

2008-06-12 Thread Matt Benson
Have I mentioned I HATE Maven? I don't understand how something that looks innocuous like building an RC can go out and update the production website, which, AFAICT, isn't backed up anywhere, so I guess I'll be trying to regen it from the previous release. Can anyone tell me simply exactly what c