[ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0

The Apache Commons VFS Project team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0. Apache Commons VFS is a Virtual File System library. This is a feature and maintenance release. Java 8 or later is required. Historical list of changes: https://commons.apache.org/proper

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0 based on RC1

This release vote passes with the following binding +1 votes: - Gary Gregory (ggregory) - Arnout Engelen (engelen) - Piotr P. Karwasz (pkarwasz) Thank you all, Gary On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 3:36 AM Piotr P. Karwasz wrote: > > Hi Gary, > > On 13.02.2025 11:51, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote: > > Hi Gary,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0 based on RC1

Hi Gary, On 13.02.2025 11:51, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote: Hi Gary, On 3.02.2025 00:26, Gary Gregory wrote: Please review the release candidate and vote. This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now.    [ ] +1 Release these artifacts    [ ] +0 OK, but...    [ ] -0 OK, but really should fi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0 based on RC1

Hi Gary, On 3.02.2025 00:26, Gary Gregory wrote: Please review the release candidate and vote. This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now. [ ] +1 Release these artifacts [ ] +0 OK, but... [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... The ha

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0 based on RC1

On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 11:09 PM Arnout Engelen wrote: > * I did not test the artifacts against any project > (I have also ran the jackrabbit-vfs-ext unit tests with the staged version now, no surprises) Arnout > On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 12:27 AM Gary Gregory > wrote: > >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0 based on RC1

orgapachecommons-1813 <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1813/org/apache/commons/commons-vfs2-project/2.10.0/> verify artifact:compare '-Dbuildinfo.ignore=*/*.spdx.json,*/*-cyclonedx.json,*/*-cyclonedx.xml' -Dmaven.test.skip=true". I think gi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0 based on RC1

m/japplis/commons-vfs/tree/uri-parser-square-bracket-decode > Let me know if you'd like a pull request and/or bug report for this change. > > As far as I'm concerned, I'm using my own branch for my project ( > https://github.com/japplis/commons-vfs/tree/ant-commander) > S

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0 based on RC1

code Let me know if you'd like a pull request and/or bug report for this change. As far as I'm concerned, I'm using my own branch for my project ( https://github.com/japplis/commons-vfs/tree/ant-commander) So if you want to proceed with the final release, it won't be a problem

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0 based on RC1

My +1 Gary On Sun, Feb 2, 2025, 18:26 Gary Gregory wrote: > We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons > VFS Project 2.9.0 was released over 3 years ago, so I would like to > release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0. > > [Note that try to verify reprod

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0 based on RC1

We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons VFS Project 2.9.0 was released over 3 years ago, so I would like to release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0. [Note that try to verify reproducibility using artifact:compare: mvn clean verify artifact:compare -DskipTests

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0 based on RC1

d a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache > > Commons VFS Project 2.9.0 was released, so I would like to release > > Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0. > > > > Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0 RC1 is available for review here: > >https://dist.apache.or

Re: Is commons-digester still an active project?

also not has been a priority compared to other components. HTH, Gary On Fri, May 17, 2024, 5:42 AM Mclachlan, Alan wrote: > Hi > > Is commons-digester still an active project? > I ask because while it's not in the Attic, the last release (3.2) was in > 2011. > > There ar

Is commons-digester still an active project?

Hi Is commons-digester still an active project? I ask because while it's not in the Attic, the last release (3.2) was in 2011. There are two CVEs in a dependency (CVE-2019-10086 and CVE-2014-0114). Is there going to be a commons-digester with an uplifted version of commons-beanutils?

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0 based on RC1

+1 > On Mar 10, 2024, at 6:02 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache > Commons VFS Project 2.9.0 was released, so I would like to release > Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0. > > Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0 based on RC1

? It's also late here, so it could be just me sleepy doing something > wrong/silly. > > Cheers! > > On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 at 23:02, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache > > Commons VFS Project 2.9.0 was released,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0 based on RC1

er here, can you take a look at these points and I will come back to continue the review if the above is fine, please? It's also late here, so it could be just me sleepy doing something wrong/silly. Cheers! On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 at 23:02, Gary Gregory wrote: > We have fixed a few bugs and added

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0 based on RC1

We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache Commons VFS Project 2.9.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0. Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0 RC1 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/vfs/2.10.0

Re: Is there a need for a commons-physics project?

On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 8:04 PM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > Even the "units of measurement" work is a bit fragmented. If you want > > to use KILOMETERS and MILES for instance, or use FEET, you have to mix > > and match different libraries with the standard, and the different > > libraries are all

Re: Is there a need for a commons-physics project?

Hello. Le mar. 18 juil. 2023 à 00:45, Paul King a écrit : > > The main issue with jscience is lack of maintenance. It was invented > around the time of JSR 275 which was ultimately rejected. The newer > "units of measurement" work is in JSR 363 and JSR 385, while the > currency/money stuff is in

Re: Is there a need for a commons-physics project?

The main issue with jscience is lack of maintenance. It was invented around the time of JSR 275 which was ultimately rejected. The newer "units of measurement" work is in JSR 363 and JSR 385, while the currency/money stuff is in JSR 354. Even the "units of measurement" work is a bit fragmented. If

Re: Is there a need for a commons-physics project?

Hi. Le lun. 17 juil. 2023 à 18:21, Thomas a écrit : > > Maybe start small, with a universally usable prerequisite: > > something like commons-unit as an implementation of javax.measure. https://github.com/javolution/jscience https://github.com/javolution/jscience/blob/master/physics/src/main/jav

Re: Is there a need for a commons-physics project?

Maybe start small, with a universally usable prerequisite: something like commons-unit as an implementation of javax.measure. See: https://unitsofmeasurement.github.io/unit-api/site/apidocs/javax/measure/class-use/Unit.html | javax.measure unit-api 1.0 Even if not used for physics projects,

Re: Is there a need for a commons-physics project?

Hello. Le lun. 17 juil. 2023 à 13:53, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > It might already exist in Apache Sedona. Thanks for the pointer. >From a 30 s look at the web site[1] it seems more GIS-oriented. [It might be worth comparing its features with "Commons Geometry".] Regards, Gilles [1] https://se

Re: Is there a need for a commons-physics project?

It might already exist in Apache Sedona. Gary On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 7:35 AM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Short answer: No. > > We have had the (failed, for various reasons[1]) "Commons Math" > experiment. No need to try another one with such a vague scope. > > Regards, > Gilles > > [1] Cf. reco

Re: Is there a need for a commons-physics project?

Short answer: No. We have had the (failed, for various reasons[1]) "Commons Math" experiment. No need to try another one with such a vague scope. Regards, Gilles [1] Cf. record of discussions in the ML archives. - To unsubscri

Is there a need for a commons-physics project?

Re: Project

resulting binaries will run on a clean install any current Windows OS without any additional libraries. Mark On 09/06/2023 02:56, Harvey Pullen Jr. wrote: *Hi,* *I would like to complete the task below. I am sending this email as instructed below.* *Project: *commons *Created by:* ma...@

Project

*Hi,* *I would like to complete the task below. I am sending this email as instructed below.* *Project: *commons *Created by:* ma...@apache.org *Task added: *Thu Aug 18 2016 *Difficulty: * Beginner - This is an easy task that anyone can get started on *Task type:* Programming and Development

[numbers][GSoC2023] About “Add support for extended precision floating-point numbers” project

vanced usage. I wrote the implementation this way to avoid memory allocation of a new object for every operation. I do not know if it actually impacts the performance. A first project would be to: copy the entire DD class into a JMH project; add OO methods that create a new instance for all oper

Re: [GSoC2023] About “Add support for extended precision floating-point numbers” project

"[Numbers]", referring to the project (a.k.a. "component") where the code being discussed, belongs (or should/will belong, in this case, since the current implementation is in "Statistics"). > > About “Add support for extended precision floating-point numbers” &

[GSoC2023] About “Add support for extended precision floating-point numbers” project

To whom it may concern, About “Add support for extended precision floating-point numbers” project of Google Summer of Code 2023. My name is Sentaro Onizuka. I emailed several days ago about my interest in this project and received the details and related resources. And I read the resources

Re: [GSoC] Commom Math project questions

Hi. Le ven. 3 mars 2023 à 01:13, Alex Ryu a écrit : > > To whom it may concern, > > > > Hello, my name is HyoungJoo Ryu. > > I am interested in participating in Apache Software Foundation’s “Common > Math” project through Google Summer of Code this summer. Especia

[GSoC] Commom Math project questions

To whom it may concern, Hello, my name is HyoungJoo Ryu. I am interested in participating in Apache Software Foundation’s “Common Math” project through Google Summer of Code this summer. Especially idea #1: Redesign and modularize the “ml” package to enable multi-thread usage. I am

[gsoc][statistics] Request for advice about the Commons Statistics project.

Hi, Thanks for your interest in Apache Commons. The GSoC project for Statistics is part of the ongoing project to refactor the large Commons Math (CM) component into smaller modular components (see [1-5]). I have CC'd the commons developer's list on this e-mail. If you subscribe y

Re: [GSoC 2023] Re: Regarding contribution to Commons Numbers Project under GSoC 2023

tly of the GSoC timeline) how you'd like to contribute to the "Commons" project (of which "Numbers"[1] is but one of its many "components"[2]). Hence, don't hesitate to browse through the codebase and issues, or ask questions here and make suggestions on wh

[GSoC 2023] Re: Regarding contribution to Commons Numbers Project under GSoC 2023

example [1] for the 2022 project in Numbers. The label will be the same across all Apache projects so it will allow you to search more than just Commons projects. In the meantime there are many open tickets in the issue tracking system for Apache projects. Please take a look and if you find anything of

Regarding contribution to Commons Numbers Project under GSoC 2023

Respected Sir/Ma’am, My name is Manav P Gondalia, and I am writing to express my interest in participating in Google Summer of Code and contributing to the project "Common Numbers" under Apache Software Foundation. I have been following Apache Software Foundation’s development f

Re: [all] multi-module project aggregate javadoc

cs spread through the various site > modules. However, in each project the modules are possible to use > altogether. So it would be useful to have an aggregate javadoc > somewhere on their sites. > > Note this is in contrast to VFS where there is a link on the site at > the top l

[all] multi-module project aggregate javadoc

Currently the multi-module projects RNG, Math, Numbers, and Geometry create a site that has the javadocs spread through the various site modules. However, in each project the modules are possible to use altogether. So it would be useful to have an aggregate javadoc somewhere on their sites. Note

Re: [dbutils] Project release cycle

Hi Alexey, We are volunteers here, there is no traditional schedule or management. Your message now puts dbutils on our collective todo list for a release. Personally, I plan on releasing "soon" lang, io, pool, dbcp, cvs, text, configuration, but likely not in that order. Gary On Mon, May 2, 2

Re: [dbutils] Project release cycle

). But again, if I find myself having to work on a $project during that time, then I'd have to postpone these releases (i.e. I would not be able to _volunteer_ for this.) One thing that is always welcome is reviews of pull requests and issues that could block a release (e.g. any regression i

[dbutils] Project release cycle

Hello, I would like to clarify the reason why there were no releases for so long time period? There have been solved some critical bugs, and it would be nice to get them live. But instead, while waiting for a release, we need to fork the lib and release it internally ourselves. Could you please c

Re: [all] Do not build the project site with Maven 3.8.2

> On Mar 13, 2022, at 6:27 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have a lazy release vote in flight for commons-release-plugin 1.8.0 that > include a hack to workaround this issue.. > Many thanks Gary. -Rob > Gary > >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2022, 14:53 Rob Tompkins wrote: >> >> >> On Mar 4, 2

Re: [all] Do not build the project site with Maven 3.8.2

We have a lazy release vote in flight for commons-release-plugin 1.8.0 that include a hack to workaround this issue.. Gary On Fri, Mar 4, 2022, 14:53 Rob Tompkins wrote: > > > > On Mar 4, 2022, at 9:57 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 9:56 AM Alex Herbert > > wrote: > >

Re: [all] Do not build the project site with Maven 3.8.2

> On Mar 4, 2022, at 9:57 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 9:56 AM Alex Herbert > wrote: > >>> On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 at 14:43, Rob Tompkins wrote: >>> >>> Yes that is on my plate to fix, but I haven’t gotten time to fix it. >> I’ve for the first time in a while got some tim

Re: [all] Do not build the project site with Maven 3.8.2

On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 9:56 AM Alex Herbert wrote: > On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 at 14:43, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > > > Yes that is on my plate to fix, but I haven’t gotten time to fix it. > I’ve for the first time in a while got some time this weekend away from my > standard obligations and will try to p

Re: [all] Do not build the project site with Maven 3.8.2

On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 at 14:43, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > Yes that is on my plate to fix, but I haven’t gotten time to fix it. I’ve for > the first time in a while got some time this weekend away from my standard > obligations and will try to put some time in on it. Pardon my being remiss, > my pers

Re: [all] Do not build the project site with Maven 3.8.2

at home and at work. -Rob > On Mar 4, 2022, at 5:33 AM, Alex Herbert wrote: > > FYI: Release managers > > I have found an issue when building the site using maven 3.8.2. > > The project site descriptor (site.xml) is inherited from > commons-parent. This should be

[all] Do not build the project site with Maven 3.8.2

FYI: Release managers I have found an issue when building the site using maven 3.8.2. The project site descriptor (site.xml) is inherited from commons-parent. This should be merged with the site.xml from the project. The parent brings in a lot of extra menu items and commons-skin. I have been

Re: Free MFA hardware tokens for your project

at's clear. Thanks. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member - Open Technologies, IBM From: Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM To: dev@commons.apache.org Date: 12/13/2021 02:30 PM Subject:Free MFA hardware tokens for your project Hi! I work with the Developer Best Practice

Free MFA hardware tokens for your project

Hi! I work with the Developer Best Practices Working Group of the Linux Foundation's Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF) <https://github.com/ossf/wg-best-practices-os-developers> "Great Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) Distribution Project" <https://github.co

Re: [OGNL] Drop commons-ognl project

pt., 3 gru 2021 o 12:30 sebb napisał(a): > Only TLPs can be moved to the Attic. > > Commons components can be moved to dormant if they are no longer being > developed. Thanks sebb, didn't know that :) Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ ---

Re: [OGNL] Drop commons-ognl project

On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 08:08, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > > And just to clarify one thing: by drop I mean moving the project into > the attic, I still would like to extract some stuff (like benchmarks) > into the code hosted at Github. Only TLPs can be moved to the Attic. Commons compo

Re: [OGNL] Drop commons-ognl project

And just to clarify one thing: by drop I mean moving the project into the attic, I still would like to extract some stuff (like benchmarks) into the code hosted at Github. Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ pt., 26 lis 2021 o 10:28 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > &g

Re: [OGNL] Drop commons-ognl project

czw., 25 lis 2021 o 15:57 Mark Thomas napisał(a): > Am I reading the archives correctly when I conclude there has never been > an ASF release of Commons OGNL of any version? (snapshots don't count) Yes, no stable release of Commons OGNL. > Why will migrating changes from 3.x be any easier if the

Re: [OGNL] Drop commons-ognl project

czw., 25 lis 2021 o 15:42 Jason Pyeron napisał(a): > > I wonder what do you think about dropping commons-ognl project? This > > was supposed to be the next major version (4.x) but there was no > > activity in the project for a long time. Also migrating all the > > Does

Re: [OGNL] Drop commons-ognl project

On 25/11/2021 08:21, Lukasz Lenart wrote: Hi, I wonder what do you think about dropping commons-ognl project? This was supposed to be the next major version (4.x) but there was no activity in the project for a long time. Also migrating all the changes from the previous Github version is rather

RE: [OGNL] Drop commons-ognl project

> -Original Message- > From: Lukasz Lenart > Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2021 3:22 AM > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: [OGNL] Drop commons-ognl project > > Hi, > > I wonder what do you think about dropping commons-ognl project? This > was suppose

[OGNL] Drop commons-ognl project

Hi, I wonder what do you think about dropping commons-ognl project? This was supposed to be the next major version (4.x) but there was no activity in the project for a long time. Also migrating all the changes from the previous Github version is rather an impossible task. At the same time I want

Re: basically what should I do when I found project stealing codes from commons repo while deleted license header？

ked. nope. > > > Gary Gregory 于2021年10月14日周四 上午2:17写道： > >> Probably nothing if that project contains a NOTICE file with the proper >> reference back to Apache. >> >> Gary >> >> On Sat, Oct 9, 2021, 01:51 Xeno Amess wrote: >> >> > >> > >> >

Re: basically what should I do when I found project stealing codes from commons repo while deleted license header？

I checked. nope. Gary Gregory 于2021年10月14日周四 上午2:17写道： > Probably nothing if that project contains a NOTICE file with the proper > reference back to Apache. > > Gary > > On Sat, Oct 9, 2021, 01:51 Xeno Amess wrote: > > > > > >

Re: basically what should I do when I found project stealing codes from commons repo while deleted license header？

Probably nothing if that project contains a NOTICE file with the proper reference back to Apache. Gary On Sat, Oct 9, 2021, 01:51 Xeno Amess wrote: > >

basically what should I do when I found project stealing codes from commons repo while deleted license header？

Re: [All] "Apache" vs "ASF" (Was: [...] master updated [...] Add full project name [...])

Le mer. 4 août 2021 à 15:54, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 9:27 AM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Hello. > > > > Shall we use "ASF" whenever such changes are made? > > I do not think so, the name of the Project is "Apache Com

Re: [All] "Apache" vs "ASF" (Was: [...] master updated [...] Add full project name [...])

On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 9:27 AM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hello. > > Shall we use "ASF" whenever such changes are made? I do not think so, the name of the Project is "Apache Commons", the name of each Apache Commons "component" is "Apache Commons T

Re: [All] "Apache" vs "ASF" (Was: [...] master updated [...] Add full project name [...])

On Wed, 4 Aug 2021 at 14:27, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hello. > > Shall we use "ASF" whenever such changes are made? > > Currently every commons project I have locally uses 'Apache Commons' in the project name. Why change to 'ASF Commons? Is this something used on other ASF projects? Alex

[All] "Apache" vs "ASF" (Was: [...] master updated [...] Add full project name [...])

che.org/repos/asf/commons-rng.git > > > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: > new 532d924 Add full project name to examples modules > 532d924 is described below > > commit 532d924fca21ef3baeab9af241c9e83d0d2c79e8 > Author: Alex Her

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons VFS Project 2.9.0

The Apache Commons VFS Project team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Commons VFS Project 2.9.0. Apache Commons VFS is a Virtual File System library. Maintenance release. Requires Java 8. Changes in this version include: Fixed Bugs: o Add and use

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.9.0 based on RC1

> > We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons > > VFS Project 2.8.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache > > Commons VFS Project 2.9.0. > > > > Apache Commons VFS Project 2.9.0 RC1 is available for review here: > > https

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.9.0 based on RC1

My +! Gary On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 8:16 AM Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons > VFS Project 2.8.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache > Commons VFS Project 2.9.0. > > Apache Commons VFS Project 2.9.0 RC

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.9.0 based on RC1

es: >> >> >> /Users/garydgregory/git/commons-vfs/commons-vfs2/src/test/resources/test-data/size-0-file.bin >> >> ***** >> >> >> >>> On Jul 17, 2021, at 8:16 AM, Gary Gregory >> wrote: >&

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.9.0 based on RC1

censes: > > > /Users/garydgregory/git/commons-vfs/commons-vfs2/src/test/resources/test-data/size-0-file.bin > > * > > > > > On Jul 17, 2021, at 8:16 AM, Gary Gregory > wrote: > > > > We have fixed a few bugs and add

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.9.0 based on RC1

e Commons > VFS Project 2.8.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache > Commons VFS Project 2.9.0. > > Apache Commons VFS Project 2.9.0 RC1 is available for review here: >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/vfs/2.9.0-RC1 (svn > revision 48862) > > The G

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.9.0 based on RC1

generation. Thanks! Bruno On Sunday, 18 July 2021, 12:16:27 am NZST, Gary Gregory wrote: We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons VFS Project 2.8.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.9.0. Apache Commons VFS Project 2.9.0 RC1

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.9.0 based on RC1

We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons VFS Project 2.8.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.9.0. Apache Commons VFS Project 2.9.0 RC1 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/vfs/2.9.0-RC1

Re: Information about the development process of commons lang project

Hello Marco, Saverio, Emanuele And Lorenzo, Thanks for your interest in our little project. For your research, It is best if you check out the Website of the Apache Commons project as well as the general ASF procedures. Apache Commons is bit special under the Apache roof , since it has a wide

Re: Information about the development process of commons lang project

Jun 4, 2021, 16:39 Lorenzo Giannini < lorenzo.giann...@studenti.unipd.it> wrote: > Dear sirs, > we are 4 computer engineering students from Padova, Italy, following a > software engineering course. > For a group project we have to analyze the development process of a > open-so

Information about the development process of commons lang project

Dear sirs, we are 4 computer engineering students from Padova, Italy, following a software engineering course. For a group project we have to analyze the development process of a open-source project. After some reflections we would like to know what the development process of your "commons

[VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.8.0 based on RC1

My +1 > > Gary > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 9:59 PM Gary Gregory wrote: > > > > Hi All: > > > > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements > > since Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0 was released, so I would like > > to release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.8.0 based on RC1

My +1 Gary On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 9:59 PM Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hi All: > > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements > since Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0 was released, so I would like > to release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.8.0. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.8.0 based on RC1

0, vendor: Ubuntu, runtime: > > /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64 > > Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8 > > OS name: "linux", version: "5.4.0-66-generic", arch: "amd64", family: "unix" > > > > > > Thanks!

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.8.0 based on RC1

> Thanks! > Bruno > > > >On Sunday, 7 March 2021, 3:59:56 pm NZDT, Gary Gregory > wrote: > > Hi All: > > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements > since Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0 was released, so I would like >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.8.0 based on RC1

rch: "amd64", family: "unix" Thanks! Bruno On Sunday, 7 March 2021, 3:59:56 pm NZDT, Gary Gregory wrote: Hi All: We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements since Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0 was released, so I would like to release A

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.8.0 based on RC1

Hi All: We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements since Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.8.0. Apache Commons VFS Project 2.8.0 RC1 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos

Re: JIRA TESTING project - obsolete?

That would be on me since I started the component but never took the time to push it through to a 1.0. I still have Hope's to take the time. Gary On Mon, Mar 1, 2021, 06:50 sebb wrote: > The JIRA TESTING project looks like it belongs to Commons, however it > is not in the Common

JIRA TESTING project - obsolete?

The JIRA TESTING project looks like it belongs to Commons, however it is not in the Commons component group, and most of the entries don't appear to have anything to do with Commons. At least one of the entries is Spam. Is it still needed?

Re: The project website

AFAICT Commons no longer uses CMS to build, so nothing needs to be done. Sebb. On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 12:51, Andrew Wetmore wrote: > > > Hi, and happy New Year. > > Checking in on the migration of your project website from the Apache CMS to a > different tech. Has there been

Re: The project website

Hi, and happy New Year. Checking in on the migration of your project website from the Apache CMS to a different tech. Has there been progress? Have you opened a Jira ticket to track it? Is there anything Infra can help with? A Andrew Wetmore Technical Writer-Editor Infra *Apache Software

Re: Update Geometry Project Dependencies

On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 at 11:58, Arturo Bernal wrote: > Hi guys, > > we need to update the info about the Junit dependency on the website of > the apache commons geometry module. We have updated from 4.x to 5 > This is an auto generated report based on the latest release. It lists the dependencie

Update Geometry Project Dependencies

Hi guys, we need to update the info about the Junit dependency on the website of the apache commons geometry module. We have updated from 4.x to 5 https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-geometry/dependencies.html

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0

The Apache Commons VFS Project team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0. Apache Commons VFS is a Virtual File System library. Maintenance release. Requires Java 8. Changes in this version include: New features: o VFS-757: [SFTP] Configure whether exec

[VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0 based on RC3

e: > >> We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache Commons >> VFS Project 2.6.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons >> VFS Project 2.7.0. >> >> Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0 RC3 is available for review here: >> ht

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0 based on RC3

My +1 Gary On Tue, Oct 27, 2020, 12:27 Gary Gregory wrote: > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache Commons > VFS Project 2.6.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons > VFS Project 2.7.0. > > Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0 RC3 i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0 based on RC3

> We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache Commons > VFS Project 2.6.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons > VFS Project 2.7.0. > > Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0 RC3 is available for review here: >https://dist.apache.org/r

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0 based on RC3

  [x] +1 Release these artifacts Building OK from tag on my environment. Thanks Bruno On Wednesday, 28 October 2020, 5:27:32 am NZDT, Gary Gregory wrote: We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache Commons VFS Project 2.6.0 was released, so I would like to

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0 based on RC3

We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache Commons VFS Project 2.6.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0. Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0 RC3 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/vfs/2.7.0

[VOTE][CANCEL] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0 based on RC2

ea and tag look good too. > > Thanks! > Bruno > > > > > On Tuesday, 27 October 2020, 6:55:34 am NZDT, Gary Gregory < > ggreg...@apache.org> wrote: > > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache Commons > VFS Project 2.6.0 was rel

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0 based on RC2

otice/readme files in the dist area and tag look good too. Thanks! Bruno On Tuesday, 27 October 2020, 6:55:34 am NZDT, Gary Gregory wrote: We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache Commons VFS Project 2.6.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Co

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0 based on RC2

We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache Commons VFS Project 2.6.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0. Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0 RC2 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/vfs/2.7.0

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0 based on RC1

> > T E S T S > > --- > > > > Results : > > > > Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 > > > > [INFO] > --

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >