Hi,
Sorry for causing the confusion. I mean to include a general subject since
I think commons would benefit from the results. However, I pointed out in
the content that the work'd be done over commons-rdf. Again, sorry for
that. :D
Regards,
~Kamila.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 8:23 PM, Gilles wrote
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 01:47:01 +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
Hello,
any experience with compiling a JAR with old Java and only adding the
module-info.jar with a new class Version? Would that allow to avoid
the Need for Multi-Release JARs? (of Course it makes a ugly
toolchain).
IIUC, there must be
> On Mar 8, 2018, at 5:47 PM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> any experience with compiling a JAR with old Java and only adding the
> module-info.jar with a new class Version? Would that allow to avoid the Need
> for Multi-Release JARs? (of Course it makes a ugly toolchain).
Log4j 2 h
Hello,
any experience with compiling a JAR with old Java and only adding the
module-info.jar with a new class Version? Would that allow to avoid the Need
for Multi-Release JARs? (of Course it makes a ugly toolchain).
Gruss
Bernd
--
http://bernd.eckenfels.net
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 17:19:05 -0700, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Mar 8, 2018, at 5:17 PM, Ralph Goers
wrote:
On Mar 8, 2018, at 4:08 PM, Gilles
wrote:
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 15:09:18 -0700, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Mar 8, 2018, at 11:06 AM, Gilles
wrote:
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:01:08 -0700, Gary Greg
That seems like a good pragmatic way about it.
Gary
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018, 16:08 Gilles wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 15:09:18 -0700, Ralph Goers wrote:
> >> On Mar 8, 2018, at 11:06 AM, Gilles
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:01:08 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 a
I almost pooped myself on that one Ralph :-) Good one!
Gary
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018, 17:19 Ralph Goers wrote:
>
>
> > On Mar 8, 2018, at 5:17 PM, Ralph Goers
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Mar 8, 2018, at 4:08 PM, Gilles
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 15:09:18 -0700, Ralph Goers wrote:
> >>>
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 17:17:40 -0700, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Mar 8, 2018, at 4:08 PM, Gilles
wrote:
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 15:09:18 -0700, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Mar 8, 2018, at 11:06 AM, Gilles
wrote:
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:01:08 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Gilles
> On Mar 8, 2018, at 5:17 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Mar 8, 2018, at 4:08 PM, Gilles wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 15:09:18 -0700, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Mar 8, 2018, at 11:06 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:01:08 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Thu, Ma
> On Mar 8, 2018, at 4:08 PM, Gilles wrote:
>
> On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 15:09:18 -0700, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>> On Mar 8, 2018, at 11:06 AM, Gilles wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:01:08 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Gilles
wrote:
> On Thu, 8 M
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 15:09:18 -0700, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Mar 8, 2018, at 11:06 AM, Gilles
wrote:
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:01:08 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Gilles
wrote:
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:48:28 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:29 AM, G
> On Mar 8, 2018, at 11:06 AM, Gilles wrote:
>
> On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:01:08 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Gilles
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:48:28 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:29 AM, Gilles
wrote:
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:01:08 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Gilles
wrote:
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:48:28 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:29 AM, Gilles
wrote:
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:09:22 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:0
> On Mar 8, 2018, at 12:48 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:29 AM, Gilles
> wrote:
>> Then these modules can define "module-info" files, and an actual build will
>> prove that the dependencies are as expected.
>>
> As Ralph as pointed out, you cannot generate a module-info f
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Gilles
wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:48:28 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:29 AM, Gilles
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:09:22 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:01 AM, ajs6f wrote:
> On Mar 8,
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:48:28 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:29 AM, Gilles
wrote:
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:09:22 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:01 AM, ajs6f wrote:
> On Mar 8, 2018, at 8:33 AM, Gilles
wrote:
> Would it be useful (and interesting as
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:29 AM, Gilles
wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:09:22 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:01 AM, ajs6f wrote:
>>
>> > On Mar 8, 2018, at 8:33 AM, Gilles
>>> wrote:
>>> > Would it be useful (and interesting as part of GSoC work) to
>>> > establish
>>>
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:21 AM, ajs6f wrote:
>
> > On Mar 8, 2018, at 12:09 PM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> >
> > That's all quite nice but the hard reality is that the tool chains out
> > there are simply not ready for JPMS, as I've painfully learned
> contributing
> > to Log4j 2. MR Jars, module-
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:09:22 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:01 AM, ajs6f wrote:
> On Mar 8, 2018, at 8:33 AM, Gilles
wrote:
> Would it be useful (and interesting as part of GSoC work) to
> establish
> (1) which tools requires fixing,
> (2) prepare enhancement requests fo
> On Mar 8, 2018, at 12:09 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> That's all quite nice but the hard reality is that the tool chains out
> there are simply not ready for JPMS, as I've painfully learned contributing
> to Log4j 2. MR Jars, module-infos, all of that breaks Maven plugins and
> tools left and r
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:01 AM, ajs6f wrote:
> > On Mar 8, 2018, at 8:33 AM, Gilles wrote:
> > Would it be useful (and interesting as part of GSoC work) to
> > establish
> > (1) which tools requires fixing,
> > (2) prepare enhancement requests for the respective projects,
> > and in the meantim
> On Mar 8, 2018, at 8:33 AM, Gilles wrote:
> Would it be useful (and interesting as part of GSoC work) to
> establish
> (1) which tools requires fixing,
> (2) prepare enhancement requests for the respective projects,
> and in the meantime, adapt the "Commons" build (with a "JDK 9"
> profile)
> (3
22 matches
Mail list logo
