Re: [commons-numbers] branch master updated: NUMBERS-161: Class "Angle" (holding the user-supplied value without round-off).

Le jeu. 3 juin 2021 à 01:17, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 23:48, wrote: > > -- SNIP -- > > > > > - > > + > > > > > > > > > > Disabling the checkstyle rule applies to all code. Some of the code in > numbers should conform to this rule (Comple

Re: [commons-numbers] branch master updated: NUMBERS-161: Class "Angle" (holding the user-supplied value without round-off).

On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 23:48, wrote: -- SNIP -- > - > + > > > > Disabling the checkstyle rule applies to all code. Some of the code in numbers should conform to this rule (Complex, Fraction, etc). This case should use the checkstyle exclusions file instead.

Re: [OFF-LIST][CANCELLED][VOTE] Release Apache Commons Validator 1.7 based on RC2

> On Aug 3, 2020, at 12:57 PM, sebb wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 17:50, Rob Tompkins > wrote: >> >> I’m happy to roll RC3 if you want another set of hands in there….less busy >> work for you. > > Thanks, but I'm already almost done. > > The release plugin has

Re: [OFF-LIST][CANCELLED][VOTE] Release Apache Commons Validator 1.7 based on RC2

On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 17:50, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > I’m happy to roll RC3 if you want another set of hands in there….less busy > work for you. Thanks, but I'm already almost done. The release plugin has made it much easier. > -Rob > > > On Aug 3, 2020, at 12:48 PM, sebb wrote: > > > > CANCEL

[OFF-LIST][CANCELLED][VOTE] Release Apache Commons Validator 1.7 based on RC2

I’m happy to roll RC3 if you want another set of hands in there….less busy work for you. -Rob > On Aug 3, 2020, at 12:48 PM, sebb wrote: > > CANCELLED due to issues with Surefire plugin. > New VOTE to follow soon. > > On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 14:41, Matt Sicker wrote: >> >> One of the main cha

Re: [Off-list] Re: [rng] New repository for "Commons Rng"

This message should have been off-list... Sorry for the noise, Gilles On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:09:26 +0200, Gilles wrote: Hello Eric. Good to see that you are still around. I hope that you are fine. Best, Gilles P.S. If I'm not mistaken, you did not complete the procedure for ge

[Off-list] Re: [rng] New repository for "Commons Rng"

Hello Eric. Good to see that you are still around. I hope that you are fine. Best, Gilles P.S. If I'm not mistaken, you did not complete the procedure for getting commit access... On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 10:45:38 +0200, Eric Barnhill wrote: what is the link? I searched for this repo on githu

Off

Hi, just a short Note: I'll be off for the next week, vacating in Goult, France. (Any fans of Norton, the cat, around?) Read ya, Jochen

Re: [Off-list] Re: [math] RealMatrixFormat.parse()

Not really "off-list". Sorry for the noise... Gilles On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 01:41:25 +0100, Gilles wrote: HAPPY NEW YEAR!! Ole Thanks, Ole. Best wishes to you too, Gilles - To unsubscribe, e-mail: de

[Off-list] Re: [math] RealMatrixFormat.parse()

HAPPY NEW YEAR!! Ole Thanks, Ole. Best wishes to you too, Gilles - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [digester] Should popping the last object off the stack update the root?

2015-01-02 21:29 GMT+01:00 Barney : > Thanks Benedikt, I'll put a patch together and submit a JIRA. > > The main reason I didn't do that the first time was I wasn't sure if this > idea had already been considered and rejected for some reason, so I thought > I'd just check here first. TBH there h

Re: [digester] Should popping the last object off the stack update the root?

Thanks Benedikt, I'll put a patch together and submit a JIRA. The main reason I didn't do that the first time was I wasn't sure if this idea had already been considered and rejected for some reason, so I thought I'd just check here first. Cheers,

Re: [digester] Should popping the last object off the stack update the root?

Hello Barney, thanks for the report. The normal way for contributing code is by attaching a patch to jira [1]. Don't forget to include some unit tests ;-) TIA! Benedikt [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira 2015-01-02 12:26 GMT+01:00 Barney : > Hi, > > There seems to me to be a bit of a discrepan

[digester] Should popping the last object off the stack update the root?

Hi, There seems to me to be a bit of a discrepancy between the way push() and pop() interact with the root object when stack actions are used to change the object. * If a stack action changes the root object when being pushed onto the stack then the root reference is set to the changed objec

Re: [JCS] - proposal on a off-heap plugin for JCS based on DirectMemory

2011/11/19 Raffaele P. Guidi : > We could also provide a high performance serializer/deserializer based on > protostuff... but, in any case let's follow the simplest path to > demonstrate the case, there will always be room for improvement. I'm sure > Mir will show us something as soon as it will b

Re: [JCS] - proposal on a off-heap plugin for JCS based on DirectMemory

We could also provide a high performance serializer/deserializer based on protostuff... but, in any case let's follow the simplest path to demonstrate the case, there will always be room for improvement. I'm sure Mir will show us something as soon as it will be ready... I used to put stuff in githu

Re: [JCS] - proposal on a off-heap plugin for JCS based on DirectMemory

On 19.11.11 09:43, Raffaele P. Guidi wrote: > It depends on what JCS requires to manage. If it handles the key-value > mapping on its own (as I suppose it does) you shouldn't need to use DM's > CacheService (it would be a waste of memory) which does the same. > CacheService puts KV mapping on top

Re: [JCS] - proposal on a off-heap plugin for JCS based on DirectMemory

It depends on what JCS requires to manage. If it handles the key-value mapping on its own (as I suppose it does) you shouldn't need to use DM's CacheService (it would be a waste of memory) which does the same. CacheService puts KV mapping on top of MemoryStorageService (and some more things such a

Re: [JCS] - proposal on a off-heap plugin for JCS based on DirectMemory

Hi Everyone, after looking into the DirectMemory code, I figured that instead of using MemoryManagerService, I can directly use the CacheService interface. The CacheServiceImpl class seems to do almost all the work. So I am thinking why rewrite the same code? What do you think? -Mir On Thu, Nov 1

Re: [JCS] - proposal on a off-heap plugin for JCS based on DirectMemory

Mir (in cc) volounteered on this task - I think he could start following your advice to use IndexDiskCache as a template and try to implement it on top of our MemoryManagerService. I suggest Mir and I subscribe to the commons mailing lists (I already did) and Thomas (and anyone interested) subscrib

Re: [JCS] - proposal on a off-heap plugin for JCS based on DirectMemory

On 09.11.11 00:10, Raffaele P. Guidi wrote: > This is not so different from an indexed file, just it is in memory - maybe > you could take a look at the code (which is fairly simple) and get back to > us with some more targeted questions. I understand that the plugin is supposed to be added as an

Re: [JCS] - proposal on a off-heap plugin for JCS based on DirectMemory

faeleguidi/DirectMemory/wiki http://raffaeleguidi.wordpress.com/2011/01/12/directmemory-benchmark-heap-vs-off-heap-vs-orientdb/ http://www.terracotta.org/products/bigmemory Ciao, R On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Thomas Vandahl wrote: > On 08.11.11 20:59, Raffaele P. Guidi wrote: >

Re: [JCS] - proposal on a off-heap plugin for JCS based on DirectMemory

On 08.11.11 20:59, Raffaele P. Guidi wrote: > Are you guys interested in merging efforts on this? Yes, absolutely. I, however, would need some introduction into the subject to understand how this is supposed to work. I can assure my support for the integration into the JCS code. Bye, Thomas. -

[JCS] - proposal on a off-heap plugin for JCS based on DirectMemory

Hi, we discussed on our mailing list about integrating DirectMemory (which has recently begun incubation [1]) as a JCS off-heap plugin. We find that this could be more profitable, for us and the community in the whole, than spending time and effort building DirectMemory as a fully featured cache

Re: [ognl] Signing off incubation status items

Hi Christian, thanks for taking care of it!!! We received the software grants from both project owners Drew & Luc, that are OGNL committers as well, so I think you can sign off that item! TIA, all the best!!! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Sun, Ju

[ognl] Signing off incubation status items

We need to sign off the items listed on this page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ognl.html before we can graduate. I think we can sign off all of this list. I am just unsure on: "Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF been received. It is only necessa

[FILEUPLOAD] How to turn off FileUpload automatic cleanup feature?

ng to the documentation in order to turn off the cleanup automatic feature. Is there another way to turn it off? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]