Re: New sandbox component: at-digester

2010-01-09 Thread Simone Tripodi
Ok, going to fix it now, thanks!!! On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 1:46 PM, sebb wrote: > On 09/01/2010, Simone Tripodi wrote: >> Guys, >>  I finally branched the code, I made a mistake during the import (I >>  copied into trunk/trunk) and I'm very sorry for that, but nothing was >>  broken. > > No probl

Re: New sandbox component: at-digester

2010-01-09 Thread sebb
On 09/01/2010, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Guys, > I finally branched the code, I made a mistake during the import (I > copied into trunk/trunk) and I'm very sorry for that, but nothing was > broken. No problem - sandboxes are for experimentation after all... > So now on > > > https://svn.apach

Re: New sandbox component: at-digester

2010-01-09 Thread Simone Tripodi
Guys, I finally branched the code, I made a mistake during the import (I copied into trunk/trunk) and I'm very sorry for that, but nothing was broken. So now on https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/at-digester/trunk here is the current digester/trunk branch. Thank you for your help, b

Re: New sandbox component: at-digester

2010-01-08 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Henry, thanks a lot for your hint!!! Since I already created (and started committing code) on the sandbox on https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/at-digester/trunk Can I branch the code here? Should I remove the existing stuff on the target dir? Many thanks in advance, I'm sorry bu

Re: New sandbox component: at-digester

2010-01-07 Thread Henri Yandell
You should have the rights. Make the branch into the sandbox rather than inside digester. Something like: svn mkdir https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/digester-anno/ svn cp -m "Branching into the sandbox for annotation changes to digester" https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/pr

Re: New sandbox component: at-digester

2010-01-07 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all, Jochen, Rahul, thanks for your help, fine for me working on a branch, I'm more than pleased to adopt the best solution that fits with the community needs :) I don't think I have the rights needed to branch the digester, can anyone help me please? Many thanks in advance, more than appreciate

Re: New sandbox component: at-digester

2010-01-07 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi Jochen, > sorry for the delay (I'm currently at office), I think it is better if > we involve Rahul Akolkar (CC-ed in the mail): I'm an ASF committer but > not a Digester neither Commons committer; in this scenario I propose > to let the c

Re: New sandbox component: at-digester

2010-01-07 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Jochen, sorry for the delay (I'm currently at office), I think it is better if we involve Rahul Akolkar (CC-ed in the mail): I'm an ASF committer but not a Digester neither Commons committer; in this scenario I propose to let the community express the opinion in having this new feature included

Re: New sandbox component: at-digester

2010-01-07 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > very nice to meet you! I imported the digester as dependency since, > fortunately, I don't have to modify the existing code, but just adding > a new package that contains the new feature. Just adds to my concerns. If you are not even modify

Re: New sandbox component: at-digester

2010-01-06 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > first of all nice to meet you :) There are not differences since mine > is an extension that uses annotations to build the Digester, I > proposed the sandbox because is not complete, once terminated I'll > propose to merge the sanbox code in

Re: New sandbox component: at-digester

2010-01-06 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Henry, very nice to meet you! I imported the digester as dependency since, fortunately, I don't have to modify the existing code, but just adding a new package that contains the new feature. Thanks a lot for your hint, very appreciated! Best regards, Simo On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Henri Y

Re: New sandbox component: at-digester

2010-01-06 Thread Henri Yandell
One option to consider, if you want, is to branch digester into the sandbox and work on it that way. In case trying to treat it as an extension gets too painful. Hen On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:15 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi Jochen, > first of all nice to meet you :) There are not differences si

Re: New sandbox component: at-digester

2010-01-06 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Jochen, first of all nice to meet you :) There are not differences since mine is an extension that uses annotations to build the Digester, I proposed the sandbox because is not complete, once terminated I'll propose to merge the sanbox code in the proper one. Have a nice day, best regards, Simo

Re: New sandbox component: at-digester

2010-01-06 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
What is the difference between this and the digester? Why is it a new project and can't it be integrated into the existing? On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys > As a new ASF committer, I'm setting up a new Commons Sandbox, called > "@Digester" > > @Digester > >

New sandbox component: at-digester

2010-01-06 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys As a new ASF committer, I'm setting up a new Commons Sandbox, called "@Digester" @Digester The Apache commons-digester[1] is a great, light and fast XML parser; it works with the SAX APIs and provides a serie of facilities to map XML to POJOs. It's configurable in the following ways: