Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Commons Lang 2.4 released

2008-03-25 Thread Matt Benson
version 2.4 of Commons Lang. > > > > > > > > > > Lang provides a host of helper utilities > for > > > the > > > > > java.lang API, notably > > > > > String manipulation methods, basic > numerical > > > >

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Commons Lang 2.4 released

2008-03-25 Thread Henri Yandell
java.lang API, notably > > > > String manipulation methods, basic numerical > > > > methods, object > > > > reflection, creation and serialization, System > > > > properties and a > > > > series of utilities dedicate

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Commons Lang 2.4 released

2008-03-25 Thread Matt Benson
g API, notably > > > String manipulation methods, basic numerical > > > methods, object > > > reflection, creation and serialization, System > > > properties and a > > > series of utilities dedicated to help with > building > > > methods

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Commons Lang 2.4 released

2008-03-25 Thread Henri Yandell
f helper utilities for the > > java.lang API, notably > > String manipulation methods, basic numerical > > methods, object > > reflection, creation and serialization, System > > properties and a > > series of utilities dedicated to help with building > &g

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Commons Lang 2.4 released

2008-03-25 Thread Matt Benson
nipulation methods, basic numerical > > methods, object > > reflection, creation and serialization, System > > properties and a > > series of utilities dedicated to help with > building > > methods, such as > > hashCode, toString and equals. > > >

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Commons Lang 2.4 released

2008-03-25 Thread Matt Benson
erties and a > series of utilities dedicated to help with building > methods, such as > hashCode, toString and equals. > > There are a few new classes, and a lot of new > methods in Lang 2.4. > Of course there are also a bunch of bugfixes too. > We've written a > short

Re: Commons Lang 2.4 is not in public maven repo

2008-03-25 Thread Henri Yandell
Nudged the maven-repo list again. My fault - I forgot that that hadn't gone through and should have blocked the announcement. It's because we've not moved to org.apache.commons as a groupId. Hen On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:58 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > it seems tha

Commons Lang 2.4 is not in public maven repo

2008-03-25 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Hi, it seems that for some strange reason commons lang has not been added to the public m2 repo: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-lang/commons-lang/ Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Commons Lang 2.4 released

2008-03-23 Thread Henri Yandell
ation, System properties and a series of utilities dedicated to help with building methods, such as hashCode, toString and equals. There are a few new classes, and a lot of new methods in Lang 2.4. Of course there are also a bunch of bugfixes too. We've written a short article to cover all of thes

[RESULT] Lang 2.4 (RC3)

2008-03-18 Thread Henri Yandell
With 6 +1s on the Commons Lang 2.4 release from: Paul Benedict (non-binding) Oliver Heger Phil Steitz Sebastian Bazeley Rahul Akolkar Gary Gregory 2.4 is ready to go :) Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

RE: [VOTE] Lang 2.4 (RC3)

2008-03-17 Thread Gary Gregory
RC3 looks good on all SDKs I tested: http://garygregory.com/os/builds/commons-lang-2.4/index.html +1 Thank you, Gary > -Original Message- > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2008 8:50 PM > To: Commons Developers List > Subject:

Re: [VOTE] Lang 2.4 (RC3)

2008-03-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 3/15/08, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Should we release it? > > [X] +1 > [ ] -1 > -Rahul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Lang 2.4 (RC3)

2008-03-16 Thread sebb
+1 On 16/03/2008, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > Builds, sigs, jars, etc. all fine. > > Nice, complete release notes. Puts some of us to shame ;) > > Thanks! > > > Phil > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EM

Re: [VOTE] Lang 2.4 (RC3)

2008-03-16 Thread Phil Steitz
+1 Builds, sigs, jars, etc. all fine. Nice, complete release notes. Puts some of us to shame ;) Thanks! Phil - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Lang 2.4 (RC3)

2008-03-16 Thread Oliver Heger
+1 Oliver Henri Yandell wrote: > Here's the Lang 2.4 RC3 for your delectation: > > http://people.apache.org/~bayard/staging/commons-lang-2.4-rc3/ > > It's built from an export of > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_2_4_RC3 > and

Re: [VOTE] Lang 2.4 (RC3)

2008-03-15 Thread Paul Benedict
Something is wrong with the OSGi bundle description in the manifest. It's trivial, but notice how it is totally formatted incorrectly. Lots of whitespaces everywhere. +1 Paul On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's the La

[VOTE] Lang 2.4 (RC3)

2008-03-15 Thread Henri Yandell
Here's the Lang 2.4 RC3 for your delectation: http://people.apache.org/~bayard/staging/commons-lang-2.4-rc3/ It's built from an export of https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_2_4_RC3 and the Ant build built fine for me under JDK 1.3. Note: The findbugs and

Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)

2008-03-15 Thread Henri Yandell
Time & effort? :) 1.1 and 1.2 on Linux are painful too. Needs an old linux. Otherwise you need a Windows machine, which I don't have a spare one of. Hen On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Henri, why not setup Continuum to run all these jdk versions? > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)

2008-03-15 Thread Paul Benedict
Henri, why not setup Continuum to run all these jdk versions? On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 5:32 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 15/03/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Compiling against 1.2, we h

Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)

2008-03-15 Thread Henri Yandell
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 5:32 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 15/03/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Compiling against 1.2, we have only one inconsistency. The enums > > package uses WeakHashMap's Map constructor. That wasn't added until > > 1.3. Not that I could get

Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)

2008-03-15 Thread sebb
java/lang/Object;)V': Interpreting method. What did you use for testing with 1.2? Just curious. > Hen > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Gary Gregory > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The build looks good on all 9 SDKs I tested: > > http://gary

Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)

2008-03-15 Thread Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
Gary Gregory skrev den 15-03-2008 02:08: The build looks good on all 9 SDKs I tested: http://garygregory.com/os/builds/commons-lang-2.4/index.html In case you are interested the IBM JDK is available as part of their IBM Developer package for Java. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java

Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)

2008-03-14 Thread Henri Yandell
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:19 PM, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 11:11 PM > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > > Su

RE: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)

2008-03-14 Thread Gary Gregory
> -Original Message- > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 11:11 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2) > > Compiling against 1.2, we have only one inconsistency. The enums > pa

Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)

2008-03-14 Thread Henri Yandell
JDK of 1.1, we are 1.2 dependent in reality. Hen On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The build looks good on all 9 SDKs I tested: > http://garygregory.com/os/builds/commons-lang-2.4/index.html > > In the Jar manifest I see: > > X-

Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)

2008-03-14 Thread James Carman
On 3/14/08, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The build looks good on all 9 SDKs I tested: Ok, me browsing through the SVN tag now seems completely inadequate! :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)

2008-03-14 Thread sebb
On 14/03/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:41 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 14/03/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Here's the Lang 2.4 RC2 for your delectation: > > >

RE: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)

2008-03-14 Thread Gary Gregory
The build looks good on all 9 SDKs I tested: http://garygregory.com/os/builds/commons-lang-2.4/index.html In the Jar manifest I see: X-Compile-Source-JDK: 1.3 X-Compile-Target-JDK: 1.1 I know our sources are 1.3 compatible since I just tried it (see report above). But 1.1 compatible? I doubt

Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)

2008-03-14 Thread Henri Yandell
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:41 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 14/03/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Here's the Lang 2.4 RC2 for your delectation: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~bayard/staging/commons-lang-2.4-rc2/ > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)

2008-03-14 Thread sebb
On 14/03/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's the Lang 2.4 RC2 for your delectation: > > http://people.apache.org/~bayard/staging/commons-lang-2.4-rc2/ > Sigs etc are fine. Ant 1.6.5 and Maven 1.0.2 test OK using Java 1.3.1 > It's b

Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4

2008-03-14 Thread Paul Benedict
; > wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > Strange Thing: The source distro unpacks to " > commons-lang-2.4.1-src" - > > > > > don't know where the "2.4.

[VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)

2008-03-14 Thread Henri Yandell
Here's the Lang 2.4 RC2 for your delectation: http://people.apache.org/~bayard/staging/commons-lang-2.4-rc2/ It's built from an export of https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_2_4_RC2 and the Ant build built fine for me under JDK 1.3. Note: The findbugs and

Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4

2008-03-14 Thread Henri Yandell
quot;2.4.1" version comes from - I re-built from > > your > > > > 2.4 source distro and it created a source distro which unpacks > > > > correctly to "commons-lang-2.4-src". > > > > > > > > Not sure whether thats a show

Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4

2008-03-13 Thread Paul Benedict
: > > > Strange Thing: The source distro unpacks to "commons-lang-2.4.1-src" - > > > don't know where the "2.4.1" version comes from - I re-built from > your > > > 2.4 source distro and it created a source distro which unpacks > > > co

Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4

2008-03-13 Thread Henri Yandell
stro and it created a source distro which unpacks > > correctly to "commons-lang-2.4-src". > > > > Not sure whether thats a show stopper or not - going to be confusing > > for users if we ever do a "2.4.1" release though. > > IMO that needs to be f

Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4

2008-03-13 Thread Torsten Curdt
Strange Thing: The source distro unpacks to "commons-lang-2.4.1-src" - don't know where the "2.4.1" version comes from - I re-built from your 2.4 source distro and it created a source distro which unpacks correctly to "commons-lang-2.4-src". Not sure whether

Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4

2008-03-13 Thread Niall Pemberton
ce distro unpacks to "commons-lang-2.4.1-src" - don't know where the "2.4.1" version comes from - I re-built from your 2.4 source distro and it created a source distro which unpacks correctly to "commons-lang-2.4-src". Not sure whether thats a show stopper or not

[VOTE] Release Lang 2.4

2008-03-13 Thread Henri Yandell
Here's the Lang 2.4 RC1 for your delectation: http://people.apache.org/~bayard/staging/commons-lang-2.4-rc1/ It's built from an export of https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_2_4_RC1 and the Ant build built fine for me under JDK 1.3. Note: The findbugs and

Re: [lang] 2.4 release?

2008-03-12 Thread Henri Yandell
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 5:30 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/03/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > All the issues for 2.4 are done; seems like it's release time? > > There are a few Findbugs errors that look easy to fix, e.g > > Computation of average could overflow i

Re: [lang] 2.4 release?

2008-03-11 Thread Niall Pemberton
vn -Prc clean package ...on the rc1 tagged copy If you run "install" rather than package it will sign and create checksums as well - although the checksums are not in target - only in copy installed in you local repo. Also need to have gpg configured for it to sign the artifacts. Nia

Re: [lang] 2.4 release?

2008-03-11 Thread sebb
they are not really needed in tags and branches. > * sign commons-lang-2.4* > * upload for inspection > * upload site [site gets OOMs with findbugs and cobertura turned on] > * call vote > > This is my first M2 release, so let me know if that doesn't sound >

[lang] 2.4 release?

2008-03-11 Thread Henri Yandell
All the issues for 2.4 are done; seems like it's release time? Sounds like that means doing: * Edit pom.xml and project.xml to be 2.4 * Tag as rc1 * Switch to JDK 1.4 * Run mvn -Prc clean package * sign commons-lang-2.4* * upload for inspection * upload site [site gets OOMs with findbug

Re: [lang] 2.4 on 1.4?

2008-01-16 Thread Henri Yandell
If that's the only 1.4 bit, then we should target 1.3 and hit 1.5 with Lang 3.0/LangTwo (depending on whether the API changes horribly). Hen On Jan 16, 2008 3:05 PM, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is a dependency in StringEscapeUtils on a Java 1.4 method. Is this > intentional?

[lang] 2.4 on 1.4?

2008-01-16 Thread Gary Gregory
There is a dependency in StringEscapeUtils on a Java 1.4 method. Is this intentional? The build properties for Ant and Maven still refer to 1.3 as the source level. I have a fix ready for StringEscapeUtils. Or the build properties should be updated. Thank you. Gary Gregory Senior Software Eng

Lang 2.4

2007-10-25 Thread Henri Yandell
So, Lang 2.4 is starting to get pretty close. Matt's got his new feature in the works, and I'm going to look through the 3.0 ones for things to pull down (hint to anyone waiting... having a patch is the criteria). There's only one issue needing major discussion currently, and