mons Developers List
Subject: Re: JDK8 compatible javadoc
>so it would be nice if our components do compile and work on Java 8
It does of course. But if you compile with java8 then it _might_ not work with
older java versions. So it's fine for packages built by Fedora FOR Fedora. But
th
>so it would be nice if our components do compile and work on Java 8
It does of course. But if you compile with java8 then it _might_ not work with
older java versions. So it's fine for packages built by Fedora FOR Fedora. But
those jars might not work on any other linux distro. Which is ok from
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 02/05/2014 15:37, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> > So the plan is to let each [component] pick how they want to deal with
> Java
> > 8 right?
>
> As a side note, I'd like to emphasize that our source code is being
> recompiled by downstream pac
Le 02/05/2014 15:37, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> So the plan is to let each [component] pick how they want to deal with Java
> 8 right?
As a side note, I'd like to emphasize that our source code is being
recompiled by downstream packagers, most notably Linux distributions.
Fedora 21 will default to J
So the plan is to let each [component] pick how they want to deal with Java
8 right?
Gary
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> -Xdoclint:all -Xdoclint:-missing -Xdoclint:-html
>
> That should fix the issue.
> ATTN: this must ONLY be done in a java8 profile! If you set those p
-Xdoclint:all -Xdoclint:-missing -Xdoclint:-html
That should fix the issue.
ATTN: this must ONLY be done in a java8 profile! If you set those params in
older java versions (1.7, 1.6) then the build will blow up...
LieGrue,
strub
On Wednesday, 30 April 2014, 7:47, Paul Benedict wrote:
Looks
Looks like I found the message I alluded to. Make sure you read the whole
thread for fun ;-)
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-July/019269.html
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 04/30/2014 03:50 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Well, it does not su
On 04/30/2014 03:50 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Well, it does not support HTML in the sense that you MUST close all tags.
> No lonely s...
Unless something has changed for jdk8, lonely s are supported and
even advertised like this in the main javadoc guide from Sun/Oracle:
http://www.oracle.com/tec
That's actually a really good point :-)
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Well, it does not support HTML in the sense that you MUST close all tags.
> No lonely s...
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Paul Benedict
> wrote:
>
> > JDK Javadoc only supports HTML.
Well, it does not support HTML in the sense that you MUST close all tags.
No lonely s...
Gary
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> JDK Javadoc only supports HTML. It doesn't support XHTML. I remember
> someone saying this on the OpenJDK lists but don't know where it is... bu
JDK Javadoc only supports HTML. It doesn't support XHTML. I remember
someone saying this on the OpenJDK lists but don't know where it is... but
I do remember that.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Bernd,
>
> For paragraphs I use la di da, never the concept of a "line
> sepa
Bernd,
For paragraphs I use la di da, never the concept of a "line
separator", that's a rendering concept IMO, not content, which is what
Javadoc is. For code examples, then you end up in ... unless
it's inline then you use {@code ...}.
For IO-424, I've seen some discussion on the Maven ML and Ji
Am Tue, 29 Apr 2014 20:19:03 -0400
schrieb Gary Gregory :
> If you think XHTML/XML you should be fine.
Hm, actually I dont know. It looks that neighter block (HTML)
nor self-closing (XHTML) is valid/preferred. (So I plan to only
use and as paragraph or line seperators.)
BTW: Gary, did you fin
If you think XHTML/XML you should be fine.
Gary
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Hello,
>
> while running javadoc on VFS2 I get quite a few errors, especially
> about self-closing (I can fix those) and (I am not sure how
> to fix those).
>
> Is there any (ASF) JavaDoc
Hello,
while running javadoc on VFS2 I get quite a few errors, especially
about self-closing (I can fix those) and (I am not sure how
to fix those).
Is there any (ASF) JavaDoc guidelines which is recent enough to explain
the JDK8 absudities? The Oracle Guide is outdated and actually
recommends
15 matches
Mail list logo
