2015-02-18 13:22 GMT+01:00 Stian Soiland-Reyes :
> Also, as changing Java package names is a drastic step, you would
> think three times before introducing breaking changes at all. (or if
> you do - do so with a big bang and "fix everything" :) ).
>
> So I think this specialization looks all sensi
Also, as changing Java package names is a drastic step, you would
think three times before introducing breaking changes at all. (or if
you do - do so with a big bang and "fix everything" :) ).
So I think this specialization looks all sensible, specially for
Apache Commons which are utility librari
2015-02-18 5:09 GMT+01:00 Peter Ansell :
> On 18 February 2015 at 12:28, sebb wrote:
> > On 17 February 2015 at 22:56, Peter Ansell
> wrote:
> >> On 17 February 2015 at 21:48, sebb wrote:
> >>> On 17 February 2015 at 06:13, Benedikt Ritter
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> and the maven coordina
On 18 February 2015 at 12:28, sebb wrote:
> On 17 February 2015 at 22:56, Peter Ansell wrote:
>> On 17 February 2015 at 21:48, sebb wrote:
>>> On 17 February 2015 at 06:13, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>>
>>
>>
and the maven coordinates when we break binary compatibility (= bump up the
maj
On 17 February 2015 at 22:56, Peter Ansell wrote:
> On 17 February 2015 at 21:48, sebb wrote:
>> On 17 February 2015 at 06:13, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
>
>
>>> and the maven coordinates when we break binary compatibility (= bump up the
>>> major version number). We do this to avoid jar hell. Th
On 17 February 2015 at 21:48, sebb wrote:
> On 17 February 2015 at 06:13, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>> and the maven coordinates when we break binary compatibility (= bump up the
>> major version number). We do this to avoid jar hell. This way two versions
>> of the same commons library can be in
On 17 February 2015 at 06:13, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hello Peter
>
> 2015-02-15 22:49 GMT+01:00 Peter Ansell :
>
>> On 15 February 2015 at 21:29, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>>
>>
>> > We like to underline, that we have no experience with the RDF
>> > specification. From a technical point of view w
Hello Peter
2015-02-15 22:49 GMT+01:00 Peter Ansell :
> On 15 February 2015 at 21:29, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
>
> > We like to underline, that we have no experience with the RDF
> > specification. From a technical point of view we can help to develop the
> > proposed API (according to our desi
On 15 February 2015 at 21:29, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> We like to underline, that we have no experience with the RDF
> specification. From a technical point of view we can help to develop the
> proposed API (according to our design guide lines [3]).
Hi Benedikt,
On my personal projects I tend
