Re: [commons-functor] branch master updated (1e3145b -> 9b217ed)

don't forget to update changes.xml when you merge a PR. It's > simpler, more transparent, and provides info for attribution. > > TY, > Gary > > -- Forwarded message ----- > From: > Date: Tue, Nov 24, 2020, 02:25 > Subject: [commons-functor] branch mas

Re: [commons-functor] branch master updated (1e3145b -> 9b217ed)

:36 pm UTC, Gary Gregory wrote: Please don't forget to update changes.xml when you merge a PR. It's simpler, more transparent, and provides info for attribution. TY, Gary -- Forwarded message - From: Date: Tue, Nov 24, 2020, 02:25 Subject: [commons-functor] b

Fwd: [commons-functor] branch master updated (1e3145b -> 9b217ed)

Please don't forget to update changes.xml when you merge a PR. It's simpler, more transparent, and provides info for attribution. TY, Gary -- Forwarded message - From: Date: Tue, Nov 24, 2020, 02:25 Subject: [commons-functor] branch master updated (1e3145b -> 9b21

Fwd: svn commit: r1541636 - in /commons/proper/functor/trunk/core/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/generator/loop/ main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/range/ test/java/org/apache/commons/fun

Oops; this should have been Range-=Iterator. I have modified the svn log appropriately. Matt -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:54 AM Subject: svn commit: r1541636 - in /commons/proper/functor/trunk/core/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/functor

Re: svn commit: r1541567 - /commons/proper/functor/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/range/AbstractRange.java

Thanks! On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:50 AM, wrote: > Author: kinow > Date: Wed Nov 13 15:50:33 2013 > New Revision: 1541567 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1541567 > Log: > Add missing license header > > Modified: > > commons/proper/functor/trunk/core/src/mai

Re: Commons functor

ttp://kinoshita.eti.br http://tupilabs.com > > From: Mats Aune >To: ki...@apache.org; denn...@apache.org >Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 6:40 AM >Subject: Commons functor > > > >Hi, are there any plans for releasing this project? > > >T

Re: svn commit: r1439683 - in /commons/proper/functor/branches/FUNCTOR-14-mm/core/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/algorithm/ main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/generator/ main/java/or

ttp://kinoshita.eti.br >> http://tupilabs.com >> >> >> - Original Message - >> > From: "mben...@apache.org" >> > To: comm...@commons.apache.org >> > Cc: >> > Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 8:49 PM >> > Subject: sv

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: svn commit: r1370919 - /commons/proper/functor/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/functor/example/QuicksortExample.java

re not routing properly > > Modified: > > commons/proper/functor/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/functor/example/QuicksortExample.java > > Modified: > commons/proper/functor/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/functor/example/QuicksortExample.java > URL: > htt

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: svn commit: r1364676 - in /commons/proper/functor/trunk/src: changes/ main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/comparator/ test/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/comparator/

> > From: sebb >To: dev@commons.apache.org >Sent: Friday, 27 July 2012 11:40 PM >Subject: Re: svn commit: r1364676 - in /commons/proper/functor/trunk/src: >changes/ main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/comparator/ >test/java/org/apache

Re: svn commit: r1364676 - in /commons/proper/functor/trunk/src: changes/ main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/comparator/ test/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/comparator/

nerics to ComparableComparator. Few other classes that >> used the ComparableComparator were updated too. Tests were also updated >> accordingly. >> >> Modified: >> commons/proper/functor/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml >> >> commons/proper/funct

Re: svn commit: r1364676 - in /commons/proper/functor/trunk/src: changes/ main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/comparator/ test/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/comparator/

eComparator were updated too. Tests were also updated > accordingly. > > Modified: > commons/proper/functor/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml > > commons/proper/functor/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/comparator/ComparableComparator.java > > c

Re: svn commit: r1363382 - in /commons/proper/functor/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/UnarySequence.java test/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/TestUnarySeq

rontPage Bruno P. Kinoshita http://kinoshita.eti.br http://tupilabs.com - Original Message - > From: sebb > To: Commons Developers List ; Bruno P. Kinoshita > > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, 19 July 2012 4:44 PM > Subject: Re: svn commit: r1363382 - in /commons/proper/functor/trun

Re: svn commit: r1363382 - in /commons/proper/functor/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/UnarySequence.java test/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/TestUnarySeq

ssage header to the JIRA issue when resolving it. For example: >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1363382&view=rev Log: FIXED FUNCTOR-21: Added an extra verification in the then() method of UnarySequence to avoid the NPE. Tests in place. Modified: commons/proper/functor/trunk

Re: svn commit: r1363382 - in /commons/proper/functor/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/UnarySequence.java test/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/TestUnarySeq

dev@commons.apache.org >Sent: Thursday, 19 July 2012 1:05 PM >Subject: Re: svn commit: r1363382 - in /commons/proper/functor/trunk/src: >main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/UnarySequence.java >test/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/TestUnarySequence.

Re: svn commit: r1363382 - in /commons/proper/functor/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/UnarySequence.java test/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/TestUnarySeq

> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1363382&view=rev > Log: > FIXED FUNCTOR-21: Added an extra verification in the then() method of > UnarySequence to avoid the NPE. Tests in place. > > Modified: > > commons/proper/functor/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/f

Re: [functor] API, etc., review WAS Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Commons Functor 1.0 based on RC1

On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi Matt!!! :) > > great follow up, thanks for taking care of it! > > If someone already knows how the functor design has to be modified to > improve it, I can do the log-work and have it released ASAP. Hi, Simo-- For a few of the items Em

Re: [functor] API, etc., review WAS Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Commons Functor 1.0 based on RC1

, review WAS Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache > Commons Functor 1.0 based on RC1 > > All who took interest in this discussion three months ago (and still > have any cycles to spare):  Please add your thoughts to the discussion > at http://wiki.apache.org/commons/Sanity%20Check%20of%20A

Re: [functor] API, etc., review WAS Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Commons Functor 1.0 based on RC1

Hi Matt!!! :) great follow up, thanks for taking care of it! If someone already knows how the functor design has to be modified to improve it, I can do the log-work and have it released ASAP. Many thanks in advance, all the best!!! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetri

[functor] API, etc., review WAS Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Commons Functor 1.0 based on RC1

All who took interest in this discussion three months ago (and still have any cycles to spare): Please add your thoughts to the discussion at http://wiki.apache.org/commons/Sanity%20Check%20of%20APIs%2C%20etc. Thanks! Matt On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi Adrian, > O

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Commons Functor 1.0 based on RC1

Hi Adrian, Of course, we still need a lot of work before next RC, your contribution would be more then welcomed! Hope to hear from you soon, have a nice day! All the best! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://ww

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Commons Functor 1.0 based on RC1

When I take a look at JIRA, Functor currently has only two open issues, one minor and one trivial. It would be good to capture all the outstanding work items that people feel are preventing a new RC. I would also be happy to contribute to improving Functor. Cheers, Adrian. On 23 October 2011 06

[VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Commons Functor 1.0 based on RC1

Hi all guys, Since 72 hours passed I'm declaring this vote as closed and NOT passed with only 2 positive votes from PMCs: * Matt Benson * Simone Tripodi (implicit) no other votes were cast. We will continue working towards a new RC to submit. Thanks to all for your support and patience! Have

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Functor 1.0 based on RC1

On 21 October 2011 16:04, Matt Benson wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:27 AM, sebb wrote: >> On 21 October 2011 11:03, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >>> Le 21/10/2011 11:10, Simone Tripodi a écrit : >>> So, as you proposed, would be reasonable to drop the 1.0 and decide upon for a 0.1 as cur

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Functor 1.0 based on RC1

On 10/21/11 8:49 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 21/10/2011 17:04, Matt Benson a écrit : > >> The most immediate thing is that [proxy] 2 needs a unary predicate. >> It becomes ridiculous for every component we have to define such a >> basic interface in a different way. So [proxy] 2 can never be >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Functor 1.0 based on RC1

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 21/10/2011 17:04, Matt Benson a écrit : > >> The most immediate thing is that [proxy] 2 needs a unary predicate. >> It becomes ridiculous for every component we have to define such a >> basic interface in a different way.  So [proxy] 2 c

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Functor 1.0 based on RC1

On 10/21/11 8:04 AM, Matt Benson wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:27 AM, sebb wrote: >> On 21 October 2011 11:03, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >>> Le 21/10/2011 11:10, Simone Tripodi a écrit : >>> So, as you proposed, would be reasonable to drop the 1.0 and decide upon for a 0.1 as current r

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Functor 1.0 based on RC1

Le 21/10/2011 17:04, Matt Benson a écrit : The most immediate thing is that [proxy] 2 needs a unary predicate. It becomes ridiculous for every component we have to define such a basic interface in a different way. So [proxy] 2 can never be released without a [functor] release, etc. Maybe the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Functor 1.0 based on RC1

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:27 AM, sebb wrote: > On 21 October 2011 11:03, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >> Le 21/10/2011 11:10, Simone Tripodi a écrit : >> >>> So, as you proposed, would be reasonable to drop the 1.0 and decide >>> upon for a 0.1 as current release? >> >> Yes, or a 1.0-beta with clear ind

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Functor 1.0 based on RC1

On 21 October 2011 11:03, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 21/10/2011 11:10, Simone Tripodi a écrit : > >> So, as you proposed, would be reasonable to drop the 1.0 and decide >> upon for a 0.1 as current release? > > Yes, or a 1.0-beta with clear indications that this is a preview intended to > gather u

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Functor 1.0 based on RC1

Le 21/10/2011 11:10, Simone Tripodi a écrit : So, as you proposed, would be reasonable to drop the 1.0 and decide upon for a 0.1 as current release? Yes, or a 1.0-beta with clear indications that this is a preview intended to gather user feedback. Emmanuel Bourg ---

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Functor 1.0 based on RC1

Hi guys, thanks a lot for the deep review! I didn't put any effort on the design but only to prepare the package - like always, any suggestion is much more than welcome! And of course we would need a lot of help to improve the quality of the component. So, as you proposed, would be reasonable to dr

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Functor 1.0 based on RC1

On 21 October 2011 00:07, sebb wrote: > On 20 October 2011 23:31, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have a mixed feeling about this release. If I remember well this code >> predates Java 5, and despite the amazing work that has been put into to >> generify the code, I wonder if it has been suf

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Functor 1.0 based on RC1

sted > > > I haven't reviewed everything yet, but that's what I saw at a first glance. > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > > Le 20/10/2011 19:41, Simone Tripodi a écrit : >> >> Hi all guys, >> I'm writing to call for a vote to release apache commons-functo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Functor 1.0 based on RC1

composite package - Most of the equals/hashcode methods are not tested I haven't reviewed everything yet, but that's what I saw at a first glance. Emmanuel Bourg Le 20/10/2011 19:41, Simone Tripodi a écrit : Hi all guys, I'm writing to call for a vote to release apache commons-func

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Functor 1.0 based on RC1

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys, > I'm writing to call for a vote to release apache commons-functor-1.0 > based on RC1. > > The vote will stay open for 72 hours and closes on Sunday 23th, at 5:40pm CET. > > Many thanks in advance

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons Functor 1.0 based on RC1

Hi all guys, I'm writing to call for a vote to release apache commons-functor-1.0 based on RC1. The vote will stay open for 72 hours and closes on Sunday 23th, at 5:40pm CET. Many thanks in advance for reviewing, have a nice day! All the best, Simo Release notes: http://people.apach

Re: svn commit: r1180231 - /commons/proper/functor/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/UnaryCompositeBinaryFunction.java

sebb wrote: > On 9 October 2011 14:35, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Hi Sebb, >> >> sebb wrote: [snip] >>> We know what it is used for, but why choose 4 rather than 3 or 42 or 1? >>> >>> Is it arbitrary? If so, what is the possible range? >>> If not arbitrary, why choose 4? >> >> Kidding? An int has

Re: svn commit: r1180231 - /commons/proper/functor/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/UnaryCompositeBinaryFunction.java

/viewvc?rev=1180231&view=rev >>> Log: >>> '4' is a magic number. >> >> Agreed. >> >>> Modified: >>> > commons/proper/functor/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/UnaryCompositeBinaryFunction.java >>

Re: svn commit: r1180231 - /commons/proper/functor/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/UnaryCompositeBinaryFunction.java

er. > > Agreed. > >> Modified: >> commons/proper/functor/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/UnaryCompositeBinaryFunction.java >> >> Modified: >> commons/proper/functor/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/Unary

Re: svn commit: r1180231 - /commons/proper/functor/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/UnaryCompositeBinaryFunction.java

> > We know what it is used for, but why choose 4 rather than 3 or 42 or 1? > > Is it arbitrary? If so, what is the possible range? > If not arbitrary, why choose 4? > I honestly don't have any idea! :) it has inherited from original implementation, I just took care of fixing the magic number issu

Re: svn commit: r1180235 - /commons/proper/functor/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/UnaryCompositeBinaryPredicate.java

On 7 October 2011 21:55, wrote: > Author: simonetripodi > Date: Fri Oct  7 20:55:23 2011 > New Revision: 1180235 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1180235&view=rev > Log: > '4' is a magic number. > > Modified: >     > commons/proper/functor

Re: svn commit: r1180231 - /commons/proper/functor/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/UnaryCompositeBinaryFunction.java

nctor/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/UnaryCompositeBinaryFunction.java > > Modified: > commons/proper/functor/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/UnaryCompositeBinaryFunction.java > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/co

Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module apache-commons) failed

Thanks a lot for your help Stefan, much more than appreciated! Have a nice day, all the best, Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2011-09-22, Simone Tripodi wrote: > >> sorry for the silly question bu

Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module apache-commons) failed

On 2011-09-22, Simone Tripodi wrote: > sorry for the silly question but I lost the svn location place where > [functor] gump metadata are configured > ... how I can update it? You probably don't need to. Sebb had chang

Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module apache-commons) failed

2011 at 9:50 AM, Gump wrote: >>> To whom it may engage... >>> >>> This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For >>> more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, >>> and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. &

Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module apache-commons) failed

and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. >> >> Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. >> This issue affects 1 projects, >>  and has been outstanding for 2 runs. >> The current state of this project is 'Failed', with r

Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module apache-commons) failed

: > To whom it may engage... > > This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For > more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, > and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. > > Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its communit

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module commons-sandbox) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: svn commit: r1170805 - /commons/sandbox/functor/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/TransformedBinaryProcedure.java

c?rev=1170805&view=rev >>>> Log: >>>> fixed checkstyle violation: Method 'hashCode' is not designed for >>>> extension - needs to be abstract, final or empty >>> >>> Is the class intended for extension? >>> If so, and yo

Re: svn commit: r1170805 - /commons/sandbox/functor/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/TransformedBinaryProcedure.java

sion - needs to be abstract, final or empty >> >> Is the class intended for extension? >> If so, and you add fields, you won't be able to override hashCode to >> take account of them. >> If not, just make the class final. >> >> Are you sure that the

Re: svn commit: r1170805 - /commons/sandbox/functor/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/TransformedBinaryProcedure.java

valid here? > >> Modified: >>     >> commons/sandbox/functor/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/TransformedBinaryProcedure.java >> >> Modified: >> commons/sandbox/functor/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/Trans

Re: svn commit: r1170805 - /commons/sandbox/functor/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/TransformedBinaryProcedure.java

> commons/sandbox/functor/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/TransformedBinaryProcedure.java > > Modified: > commons/sandbox/functor/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/TransformedBinaryProcedure.java > URL: > http://svn.apach

Re: svn commit: r1076446 - in /commons/sandbox/functor/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/collection/FilteredIterable.java test/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/collection/TestFi

On Mar 2, 2011, at 6:19 PM, sebb wrote: > On 2 March 2011 22:55, wrote: >> Author: mbenson >> Date: Wed Mar 2 22:55:02 2011 >> New Revision: 1076446 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1076446&view=rev >> Log: >> add FilteredIterable [SNIP] >> +public class FilteredIterable implement

Re: svn commit: r1076446 - in /commons/sandbox/functor/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/collection/FilteredIterable.java test/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/collection/TestFi

On 2 March 2011 22:55, wrote: > Author: mbenson > Date: Wed Mar  2 22:55:02 2011 > New Revision: 1076446 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1076446&view=rev > Log: > add FilteredIterable > > Added: >     > commons/sandbox/functor/trunk/src/main

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module commons-sandbox) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[functor] additions/improvements WAS Re: Commons Functor changes

On Dec 8, 2010, at 2:10 PM, Haswell, Joe wrote: > Coming from a Haskell background, I really miss non-strict semantics in Java, > and it seems that functor's support for them is fairly limited (I do note > that it exists). It'd be fairly easy to implement them either over existing > functor i

Commons Functor changes

Coming from a Haskell background, I really miss non-strict semantics in Java, and it seems that functor's support for them is fairly limited (I do note that it exists). It'd be fairly easy to implement them either over existing functor interfaces or as a separate package. Also, it seems that t

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module commons-sandbox) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module commons-sandbox) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module commons-sandbox) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module commons-sandbox) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module commons-sandbox) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module commons-sandbox) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

Re: svn commit: r666136 - /commons/sandbox/functor/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/TestBinaryOr.java

Sorry, I must have missed that email. I'll take a look at what's going on and see if I can't lend a hand. Looks like you're cranking away at it, though. On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hey! You started

Re: svn commit: r666136 - /commons/sandbox/functor/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/TestBinaryOr.java

--- James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey! You started adding generics support to functor > without me!?!? :( James, I expressed that that was my intention on the dev list nearly a month ago [1], but noone responded, so I figured you were busy. I decided to go ahead, but I would be gla

Re: svn commit: r666136 - /commons/sandbox/functor/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/TestBinaryOr.java

og: > unchecked > > Modified: > > commons/sandbox/functor/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/TestBinaryOr.java > > Modified: > commons/sandbox/functor/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/functor/core/composite/TestBinaryOr.java > URL:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-functor (in module commons-sandbox) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-functor (in module commons-sandbox) failed

On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The descriptor said which is Maven1, I changed it to > (Gump speak for Maven2) so I hope it will work better on the next run. Thanks Stefan Niall > Stefan ---

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-functor (in module commons-sandbox) failed

The descriptor said which is Maven1, I changed it to (Gump speak for Maven2) so I hope it will work better on the next run. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-functor (in module commons-sandbox) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue