Hi.
Le mar. 12 févr. 2019 à 17:49, Eitan Adler a écrit :
>
> (please make sure to add me to the CC as the mailing list is presently broken)
I confirm that with either "Reply" or "Reply all", the Gmail web interface
will *not* add your address to the CC. :-(
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 07:08, sebb
On 12/02/2019 16:26, Eitan Adler wrote:
> (please make sure to add me to CC directly as the mailing is presently broken)
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 00:47, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>> -1
>>
>> Changing the reply-to configuration increases the chances of message
>> threads being moved off-list by acciden
(please make sure to add me to the CC as the mailing list is presently broken)
On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 07:08, sebb wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 12:33, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> >
> > Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 à 11:16, sebb a écrit :
> > >
> > > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 09:24, Gilles Sadowski
> >
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 16:26, Eitan Adler wrote:
>
> (please make sure to add me to CC directly as the mailing is presently broken)
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 00:47, Mark Thomas wrote:
> >
> > -1
> >
> > Changing the reply-to configuration increases the chances of message
> > threads being moved of
(please make sure to add me to CC directly as the mailing is presently broken)
On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 00:47, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> -1
>
> Changing the reply-to configuration increases the chances of message
> threads being moved off-list by accident. I am concerned about the risk
> of harm to the
Hi.
Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 à 16:08, sebb a écrit :
>
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 12:33, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> >
> > Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 à 11:16, sebb a écrit :
> > >
> > > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 09:24, Gilles Sadowski
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi.
> > > >
> > > > Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 à 1
On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 12:33, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 à 11:16, sebb a écrit :
> >
> > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 09:24, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 à 10:02, sebb a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > I checked a few other ASF lists and they
Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 à 11:16, sebb a écrit :
>
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 09:24, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 à 10:02, sebb a écrit :
> > >
> > > I checked a few other ASF lists and they all have Reply-To set either
> > > to the current list or to dev@ for list
> On Feb 11, 2019, at 3:47 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> -1
>
> Changing the reply-to configuration increases the chances of message
> threads being moved off-list by accident. I am concerned about the risk
> of harm to the community that that represents.
>
> I vote to leave the current list co
On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 09:24, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 à 10:02, sebb a écrit :
> >
> > I checked a few other ASF lists and they all have Reply-To set either
> > to the current list or to dev@ for lists such as commits@ and
> > notifications@
>
> I had a look at tha
Hi.
Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 à 10:02, sebb a écrit :
>
> I checked a few other ASF lists and they all have Reply-To set either
> to the current list or to dev@ for lists such as commits@ and
> notifications@
I had a look at that too.
But IMO
* "dev" and
* "commits", "notifications", ...
are diffe
Hello.
Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 à 09:47, Mark Thomas a écrit :
>
> -1
>
> Changing the reply-to configuration increases the chances of message
> threads being moved off-list by accident. I am concerned about the risk
> of harm to the community that that represents.
>
> I vote to leave the current li
I checked a few other ASF lists and they all have Reply-To set either
to the current list or to dev@ for lists such as commits@ and
notifications@
On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 08:47, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> -1
>
> Changing the reply-to configuration increases the chances of message
> threads being moved
-1
Changing the reply-to configuration increases the chances of message
threads being moved off-list by accident. I am concerned about the risk
of harm to the community that that represents.
I vote to leave the current list configuration as it. I do not see any
of the issues described. (I'm using
Hi all,
The mailing list dev@commons.apache.org appears to always and forcibly
set the header Reply-To: Commons Developers List
. I had asked INFRA to remove this remove the
reply-to munging. They asked for documented consensus before making
this change.
This is broken for multiple reasons.
It v
15 matches
Mail list logo