> [X] Go on with JDK 1.5
> [ ] Go on with JDK 1.4
> [ ] Stick with JDK 1.3 for the following reason:
- Jörg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 for JDK 1.5
Luc
Mario Ivankovits a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> Since it is not that easy to get in touch with a jdk 1.3 (or I tried not
> hard enough ;-) ) I'd like to ask if everyone is fine to start VFS 2
> with jdk1.5?
>
> As long as no other development need requires it to enhance the VFS 2
> api
Here's my vote. I still think we should come up with a standardized
plan for when we change package names. There are different situations
that we need to consider:
1. Jumping JDK/language versions.
2. API Incompatibility
3. Serialization incompatibility.
[X] Go on with JDK 1.5
[ ] Go on wi
[X] Go on with JDK 1.5
Niall
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Since it is not that easy to get in touch with a jdk 1.3 (or I tried not
> hard enough ;-) ) I'd like to ask if everyone is fine to start VFS 2 with
> jdk1.5?
>
> As long as no oth
Hi!
It's easy enough to get 1.3 from java.sun.com ... I also got 1.2 and
1.1 from there recently.
Ah, yes, now I found it too, it's in archive.
Since the API might not drastically change it should not be required to
rename the package to vfs5 or vfs2 or whatever.
Not sure I understa
On 23/05/2008, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Since it is not that easy to get in touch with a jdk 1.3 (or I tried not
> hard enough ;-) ) I'd like to ask if everyone is fine to start VFS 2 with
> jdk1.5?
>
It's easy enough to get 1.3 from java.sun.com ... I also got 1.2 an
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ X] Go on with JDK 1.5
> [ ] Go on with JDK 1.4
> [ ] Stick with JDK 1.3 for the following reason:
>
Cheers,
- Filip
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAI
Hi!
Since it is not that easy to get in touch with a jdk 1.3 (or I tried not
hard enough ;-) ) I'd like to ask if everyone is fine to start VFS 2
with jdk1.5?
As long as no other development need requires it to enhance the VFS 2
api I do not plan to introduce generics yet (I don't see that m
